Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-18-2009, 08:50 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,143,658 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Anyone remember this..

Democrats.senate.gov - Senator Harry Reid, Majority Leader&
Reid: Republicans Threaten To Block Funding For Our Troops Because Democrats Seek Accountability

Democrats Block Funding for American Troops in Iraq and Afghanistan | Republican Leader John Boehner (http://republicanleader.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=91495 - broken link)
House Democrats claim they strongly support the troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, but when the time came to prove it today on the House floor, they were exposed for all of America to see. And what the American people saw wasn’t pretty. A whopping 147 Democrats voted down funding for the men and women in harm’s way, stripping troop funding out of a bill meant to…well, fund the troops.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-18-2009, 08:52 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,668,310 times
Reputation: 14806
Is there no end to the hypocricy of these troop hating GOP bastards?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2009, 09:01 AM
 
Location: Irvine, CA to Keller, TX
4,829 posts, read 6,933,584 times
Reputation: 844
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenGene View Post
Just so I understand...

Democrats denying funding for troops is a bad thing.

Republicans denying funding for troops is okay, because they must have a good reason.

Do I have that right? I confess I often have trouble with double standards.
Just so I understand...

Democrats denying funding for troops is a good thing, even though they do not have a good reason?

Republicans denying funding for troops is bad, even though they have a good reason.

Glad we got that straight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2009, 09:03 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,762,921 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenGene View Post
Just so I understand...

Democrats denying funding for troops is a bad thing.

Republicans denying funding for troops is okay, because they must have a good reason.

Do I have that right? I confess I often have trouble with double standards.

Or is it OK if for Dems to deny funding and not OK for Republicans to use the same tactic? See it works both ways. This is fun do you have another one?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2009, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,762,921 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Is there no end to the hypocricy of these troop hating GOP bastards?

Awww you're angry....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2009, 09:25 AM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,451,194 times
Reputation: 5047
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
Democrats applying 1800 earmarks to a bill to back our troops good ro bad?
Are you under the impression that all the earmarks were from Democrats?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2009, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,451,194 times
Reputation: 5047
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
And to be fair - Brownback did NOT say he doesn't care for the troops - only that he wanted to defeat the current healthcare bill that he hasn't seen.
Yes, I think that's correct - it's not that he hates the troops, he just doesn't have a problem in denying funding to the troops in the Republican's continuing efforts to defeat by any means possible the health care bill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2009, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,668,310 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Or is it OK if for Dems to deny funding and not OK for Republicans to use the same tactic? See it works both ways. This is fun do you have another one?
No, but if Republicans criticized Dems for doing it, then why are they doing themselves now?

Define hypocrisy: Insincerity by virtue of pretending to have qualities or beliefs that you do not really have.

Republicans are hypocritical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2009, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,762,921 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
No, but if Republicans criticized Dems for doing it, then why are they doing themselves now?

Define hypocrisy: Insincerity by virtue of pretending to have qualities or beliefs that you do not really have.

Republicans are hypocritical.
Mmmm but the lefties defended the Dems why are they criticizing Republicans now? Oh I get it that hypocrisy thing you see in only other people, now I get it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2009, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,229,228 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenGene View Post
Are you under the impression that all the earmarks were from Democrats?
What difference does it make. I do not care where the ear marks came from. One party tried to stop the bill and one did. The used funding of the troops for political reasons. A sick display
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top