Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-11-2010, 08:42 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
The CBO says that it will CUT the deficit and not raise it.
Cost control's the key - latimes.com
I just have to ask;

You are aware that the dems/obama have structured the bill to take in taxes for 10 years, but only offer services for 6, aren't you?

In all honesty, do you not see the dishonest gimmicks in that scheme?

Do you think the real cost, real deficit savings would change if those gimmicks were taken out?

Even at that, the CBO came out today with their revised calculations of the senate bill - less savings in the deficit, more costs.

Do you really not see how completely dishonest the dems have been in structuring this bill, or is it that you do indeed know and just don't care?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-11-2010, 08:54 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
I just have to ask;

You are aware that the dems/obama have structured the bill to take in taxes for 10 years, but only offer services for 6, aren't you?

In all honesty, do you not see the dishonest gimmicks in that scheme?

Do you think the real cost, real deficit savings would change if those gimmicks were taken out?

Even at that, the CBO came out today with their revised calculations of the senate bill - less savings in the deficit, more costs.

Do you really not see how completely dishonest the dems have been in structuring this bill, or is it that you do indeed know and just don't care?
Ooo... ooo... I know! Obama and the Dems can collect the additional taxes, penalties, and charges every year, but then provide health care only 6 years out of every 10. Every decade we'll have a 4 year moratorium on health care to make the CBO's projections work.
Yeah... that's it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2010, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Ooo... ooo... I know! Obama and the Dems can collect the additional taxes, penalties, and charges every year, but then provide health care only 6 years out of every 10. Every decade we'll have a 4 year moratorium on health care to make the CBO's projections work.
Yeah... that's it!
Can you imagine if an insurance company did that? Started collecting your premiums, but didn't provide the services until 4 years later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2010, 10:58 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,452,394 times
Reputation: 6465
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Kev-

This is not a football game of Dems vs Repubs. This is your nation. Perhaps legislation of such importance should be decided by the people- what a concept. Currently the people do not want this bill. In the fall and in 2012, the will not want the democrats by virture of thier actions today.


Thank you very well stated, and true, the democrats have done themselves in by their own actions, you are correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 12:41 AM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,145 posts, read 6,534,561 times
Reputation: 1754
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
The epitome of the liberal mentality. We know what is best for you - so just you sit down and take it America..

The president we elected ran as a moderate but has governed as a radical. The country does not agree with his liberal ideology on the majority of the important issues of today; taxes, spending, deficits and the role the federal government plays in our lives.

The future that obama and the liberals have planned out is NOT what the American people voted for - and you are seeing the truth to that every day.

They oppose his policies on virtually every issue.
What is this we stuff. You voted for palin. Yes palin not McCain probably hoped the old dude would die and she would rule. He is doing exactly what he said on the bailouts and HC. The only thing he is not doing is the public option that makes the right so rabid. He even offered the fools tort reform and still no compromise. The republicans think they will just walk in and take over in November well let me ask you this if Im at a town hall and ask this new repub Washington when HC will be reformed under them what will they say. Eventually voters will ask what do you plan to do and a blank stare and saying Obamas a socialist might not do it for a lot of voters. Pure hate may work now but it will eventually lose it appeal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 04:39 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
3,390 posts, read 4,952,738 times
Reputation: 2049
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
Sometimes people need to be told what is best for them.
And this folks, is why people distrust our government. This is the attitude of the current administration and many of the Democrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 05:23 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,805,597 times
Reputation: 24863
This bill is an illustration of the control of our politics by the connected corporate thieves. I oppose this bill because it does not eliminate the private for profit sector in providing heal care for our population. We do not need private insurance, hospitals, pharma or any other form of greed driven business requiring us to pay excessive salaries, bonuses and dividends.

The government could provide all of this at far less cost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 05:33 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
He is doing exactly what he said on the bailouts and HC.
No, he is not.

He campaigned against taxing HC plans (this was McCain's plan - remember how obama mocked the idea?).

He campaigned against an individual mandate.

He campaigned against fine/penalties for individuals that didn't get HC.

He campaigned against funding for abortion and illegals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 06:18 AM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,485,000 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Kev-
This is not a football game of Dems vs Repubs. This is your nation. Perhaps legislation of such importance should be decided by the people- what a concept.
What a horrible concept!!! Which is why the founders took such pains and steps to preclude it. The staggering naiveté of your plan would play directly into the hands of charlatans, hucksters, and demagogues -- the sort of people who prey on the unsophisticated in hopes of assembling the temporary 50%+1 majority that they need to protect their own interests and line their own pockets. Thank God the founders were a lot more closely connected to reality than you are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 06:49 AM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,485,000 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
The president we elected ran as a moderate but has governed as a radical.
WRONG. He has governed as a centrist and a determined proponent of bipartisanship, his devotion to the latter having been matched by absolutely no one to his right. His agenda has been radical to the same extent that common sense is radical.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
They oppose his policies on virtually every issue.
WRONG. Simply break the health care bill for example into its major components and pieces. Assistance to low-income indivduals to obtain health care coverage? Major support. Tax credits for small businesses who provide options for health care coverage and penalties for those who could but don't? Major support. Health care exchanges? Major support. Elimination of pre-existing conditions and coverage caps? Major support. Getting rid of the doughnut hole? Major support. Taxes on the wealthy and high-end plans of the wealthy? Major support. Long-term budget deficit reductions? Major support. Point after point, when they are put to the question on an individual basis, the provisions of the health care bills earn widespread popular support. Which is why the actual provisions of the bills are not what Republicans want to talk about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top