Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There are TONS of things that are legal but not in my best interest to partake in. If a woman decides to go topless in public just because it's legal, then she better not be surprised or dismayed that folks will ogle her and pervs will stare or worse. Don't make yourselves victims, cover up.
When I breast fed in public, I was so busy feeding the baby that I didn't really note anyone ogling me. No one ever followed me home.
You do not need to "go topless" to breast feed a baby, in public or at home.
There are TONS of things that are legal but not in my best interest to partake in. If a woman decides to go topless in public just because it's legal, then she better not be surprised or dismayed that folks will ogle her and pervs will stare or worse. Don't make yourselves victims, cover up.
Yes, sure! From now on Congress should pass a law for all US women to cover all flesh like in Saudi Arabia.
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,023,210 times
Reputation: 36027
Let me ask you all a question: At what point would you consider breastfeeding indecent exposure? How far should a woman expose herself before it is considered nudity?
When I breast fed in public, I was so busy feeding the baby that I didn't really note anyone ogling me. No one ever followed me home.
You do not need to "go topless" to breast feed a baby, in public or at home.
And you are correct. My wife breastfed my children, and all she did when in public was to cover her breast and baby with a small and thin blanked she had for this purpose.
State statute 145.905 says, "A mother may breast-feed in any location, public or private, where the mother and child are otherwise authorized to be, irrespective of whether the nipple of the mother's breast is uncovered during or incidental to the breast-feeding."
The mother says they were removed for breastfeeding, here is what the restaraunt says:
I know the law is on her side in this IF she was kicked out for breastfeeding however; what do you guys think? Should breastfeeding mothers cover it up out of courtesy or "let it all hang out" so to speak?
This is the only country in the world that thinks a woman's ***** are somehow "dirty". Not only should she breastfeed but walk around topless if she wants. I used to think they should cover up too but then I saw other countries in Europe and wondered why Americans are so obsessed with this part of female anatomy.
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,023,210 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by RayinAK
Yes, sure! From now on Congress should pass a law for all US women to cover all flesh like in Saudi Arabia.
The breasts is a body part that is normally covered up so how are we jumping from covering up breasts to covering up the entire body? Talk about slippery slope arguments.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
