Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-24-2015, 08:56 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,665,937 times
Reputation: 20882

Advertisements

Iran and ISIS are enemies, due to conflicting branches of Islam, as well as competing "visions" of a Muslim caliphate in the middle east.

Why not let them just kill each other and achieve many of our political goals in doing so? Of course, Obama giving his new friends, the Iranians, the bomb creates a relative imbalance. However, once the Iranians produce a bomb, I am sure that other entities in the middle east (ISIS and the Saudis) will secure such weapons shortly after, creating a scenario for a nuclear holocaust there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-24-2015, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,834 posts, read 14,936,147 times
Reputation: 16587
Muslims killing muslims? I don't see any downside with that.

If it were up to me I'd give both sides nukes so their efficiency would improve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2015, 11:42 AM
 
4,983 posts, read 3,291,120 times
Reputation: 2739
Because IRAN will win and control Half the Arab world. Saudis will nuke Iran and Iran will nuke Mecca then the world will explode!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2015, 12:37 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,222,978 times
Reputation: 12102
Iran won't get involved with the terrorists in Iraq and Syria. They would rather support the terrorists in Yemen as then Iran would control the approaches the Straits of Hormuz. Better strategic move on their part. The Iraq thing is something they can deal with later. However, they are taking the stance that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2015, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
1,142 posts, read 2,132,509 times
Reputation: 1349
They are, the problem is they aren't killing each other off fast enough for my liking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2015, 12:42 PM
 
1,666 posts, read 1,018,050 times
Reputation: 846
They *are* letting them kill each other. They want a perpetual war and check/balance on each other. Their problem is that if they let it go, one side will win and there will no longer be a check/balance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2015, 12:48 PM
 
Location: So Cal
52,264 posts, read 52,686,640 times
Reputation: 52776
I wish we could just GTF out of the middle east, I mean just clear out.

Unfortunately they are sitting on all the damn oil and we are like oil dependent junkies.

I'm not one of these anti-oil kooks out there, I'm just more of a realist. If the largest middle east export was falafels, I don't think we'd have anyone over there.

Yeah... to answer the OP... it would be nice to arm them up, both side, and just let them go to work on each other.

Unfortunately the world doesn't work that way and things are much more grayer in real life, what does one do with all of the "collateral" damage, such as women and children, children who are innocent.

These question aren't easily answered with "lets make the middle east a giant parking lot" via a few nukes.... LOL

Cooler heads need to prevail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2015, 01:12 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,889,092 times
Reputation: 11259
The great mistake Bush and Obama have made is believing something besides ruthless dictators could keep the Sunni and Shia from killing each other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2015, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,465,032 times
Reputation: 8599
I see no equivalency between ISIS and those fighting it. I'd side with Syria and Iran over ISIS "snack bar" fanatics. The people and governments of Syria and Iran are more westernized, more secular, and less god driven. I'd rather the Middle East "winner" was someone who is politically driven and not you-disrespected-my-god driven.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2015, 01:18 PM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,443,162 times
Reputation: 24980
Globally, America should mind its own business.
You dont see china, russia etc. invading us to meddle in our internal affairs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top