Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-12-2016, 02:42 PM
 
Location: in a parallel universe
2,648 posts, read 2,322,336 times
Reputation: 5894

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmichigan View Post
Now, is your gross generalization aimed at all real estate agents or just all Realtors?
I know you're responding to someone else with a whopping post count of 11 I might add ,
but your response brings up a question that I have.

Are real estate agents - realtors? or are they 2 different things? and if so, what is the difference?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-12-2016, 03:33 PM
 
8,578 posts, read 12,437,791 times
Reputation: 16533
Quote:
Originally Posted by elliedeee View Post
I know you're responding to someone else with a whopping post count of 11 I might add ,
but your response brings up a question that I have.

Are real estate agents - realtors? or are they 2 different things? and if so, what is the difference?
All Realtors are real estate agents but not all real estate agents are Realtors. A real estate agent is licensed by the state to engage in real estate brokerage...and a Realtor is a licensed real estate agent who also happens to belong to the National Association of REALTORS®, joining through the local Realtor association. REALTOR® is a registered trademark name, kind of like Kleenex used to be.

Most people think that "Realtor" refers to any real estate agent. So...if you weren't aware of the distinction, you're not alone!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 12:21 AM
 
11,025 posts, read 7,858,607 times
Reputation: 23702
Quote:
Originally Posted by FalconheadWest View Post
No, technically, the buyer is not paying the agent. But beyond that, yes, the agent is supposed to guide their clients, but we can only guide so far with the information provided. If a buyer says they want to make a cash offer, BUT that they won't actually have the cash until their house sells, the only way to protect the client is to put the offer with a contingency. The only way not to have the contingency is to already have the cash and be willing to close on the house even if the other house doesn't sell, or risk losing all the earnest money if the house doesn't sell because they won't have the cash.

For the agent to have written a contingency into their cash offer, that's protecting their client and guiding them. Not putting in the contingency would be leaving them out to dry, but also not disclosing the situation to the sellers properly because the sellers would go livid on them if they terminated because their buyers didn't close on the house allowing the cash to be available.
Congratulations! You beat all the other agents to the "technicality." As long as the buyer is the one bringing the cash to the deal, he's paying his agent, and the seller's as well. But you knew that and at least had the honesty to note it was a technicality.


Regardless, as you've noted, the buyer's agent is making money on the deal and has the fiduciary responsibility to the buyer but should also be cognizant that they are supposed to know more about the machinations of buying and selling than their client. If the agent is unable to understand the buyer's position or convey to them how the decisions they make may affect a purchase perhaps they should consider another line of work.


Certainly the idea that the client is "beating up on the agent" is pretty farfetched and the advice that mistakes were made in the offer should have been made by the agent before the fact, rather than you today; likewise, how to make it stronger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 01:58 AM
 
8,578 posts, read 12,437,791 times
Reputation: 16533
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonutty View Post
As long as the buyer is the one bringing the cash to the deal, he's paying his agent, and the seller's as well.
This is a point which gets argued round and round. However, as a matter of fact--with an emphasis upon the word "fact"--it is the Listing Agent who is paying the Buyer's Agent in the vast majority of real estate transactions. The Listing Agent does so through a written agreement, usually embodied in an MLS listing agreement, to compensate the Buyer's Agent for their role in helping the Listing Agent sell the house. This is rather customary because, as everyone knows, Buyer's Agents do most of the work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 02:06 AM
 
9,891 posts, read 11,784,618 times
Reputation: 22087
Lets look it as I understand it.

1: Both buyer and seller, are to make full disclosure in a real estate transaction. You were offering cash, but it had to come from the sale of your present home. Under the circumstances you had to make it contingent on the sale of your home, as to withhold this information and not be able to close as your home does not close, would be borderline fraud if it did not close.

2: A contingent offer such as yours, will always be the last one chosen, if there are equal offers without contingencies.

3: In a hot market, there are most often multiple offers for a seller to chose from. And they will give the ones that have made offers an opportunity to make another higher or better offer, a chance to make another bid. Only way to be fair to both buyers and sellers. Due to laws on confidentiality, they cannot reveal how much the offer that beat them was, so the buyer has to make up their own mind on the amount of the raised offer if they want to make one.

Yes, the Realtor treated you right. They followed the laws and regulations. They presented your offer, and there were other offer(s) made, that beat your out by either not having a contingency for a home to sell, or offered more money or both. The sellers selected the offer they preferred. You turned down the opportunity to change your offer and be more competitive but you chose not to. You are the one that took your offer out of consideration by doing so. In a hot market area, that is how things happen. You were give the chance to change your offer, but you did not, so you were just beat out by someone else. Don't blame the Realtors involved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 10:17 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
10,971 posts, read 22,008,472 times
Reputation: 10695
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonutty View Post
Congratulations! You beat all the other agents to the "technicality." As long as the buyer is the one bringing the cash to the deal, he's paying his agent, and the seller's as well. But you knew that and at least had the honesty to note it was a technicality.
Well technically the the seller receives money from the buyer and then pays the commission. Technically listing broker receives the money and the pays a co-broke to the company representing the buyer. All that is divvied up on the settlement statement.

The companies then pay the agents. Technically. But really, who cares?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
10,971 posts, read 22,008,472 times
Reputation: 10695
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmichigan View Post
All Realtors are real estate agents but not all real estate agents are Realtors. A real estate agent is licensed by the state to engage in real estate brokerage...and a Realtor is a licensed real estate agent who also happens to belong to the National Association of REALTORS®, joining through the local Realtor association. REALTOR® is a registered trademark name, kind of like Kleenex used to be.

Most people think that "Realtor" refers to any real estate agent. So...if you weren't aware of the distinction, you're not alone!
Realtors are a trade organization that lobby for home ownership, home owners rights, and real estate professionals.

One plus is that Realtors do have ethical accountability that is a greater than that of the state real estate commissions. If an agent violates the Code of Ethics the organization can reprimand or fine the agent. The worst ethically challenged agents in my market aren't Realtors which stinks because it makes it virtually impossible to do anything about their actions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 10:54 AM
 
1,561 posts, read 2,403,471 times
Reputation: 2601
It would have been a real simple matter for the realtor to tell us "The reality is that right now a contingent on sale offer for this particular house would most likely not be a good idea in this particular market. May I send you some other homes while you wait for your house to close in two weeks?" Honesty is what I appreciate. And just to note, when our original contingent offer was declined and we asked her next best steps, she should have once again said, "let's wait".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,116 posts, read 16,244,339 times
Reputation: 14408
the system isn't rigged, and you weren't done wrong by the agent you hired to represent you.

yes, for you to make an offer using that agent, then you had to sign an agreement for them to represent you.

if another offer was received before the sellers agreed to yours, then you were informed of that, though there's no legal requirement to let you know - they could have simply accepted another offer. I wonder about the actual wording of "several stronger offers and you needed to offer more".

Tis easily true that a cash offer at the same or higher price occurred, and that was a better offer than you made.

She could have/possibly should have let you know how string the market there was, and the chance that other offers might occur before you could get it under contract.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top