Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's not what I would call a WEAK man. He was confident that you two get it on. And his message was not strange at all. He had a high opinion of you and felt chemistry.
And then you crushed his heart ... for whatever reason. His only mistake is not to drop you right away after you told him you are seeing others.
You don't seem like a good person.
Ok now I've heard it all.
Getting to know a guy and deciding he's not for you is now apparently a Character Flaw.
That's not what I would call a WEAK man. He was confident that you two get it on. And his message was not strange at all. He had a high opinion of you and felt chemistry.
And then you crushed his heart ... for whatever reason. His only mistake is not to drop you right away after you told him you are seeing others.
Going for walks and coffee, no dates, guy feels he has no competition ... He sounds like a minimal effort kind of guy. Is he wearing a dirty sweatshirt every time you see him?
I can't find fault with the OP's behavior or her decision to walk away from whatever she had with this guy. I'm not so sure about her need to discuss such a simple choice here, though
Going for walks and coffee, no dates, guy feels he has no competition ... He sounds like a minimal effort kind of guy. Is he wearing a dirty sweatshirt every time you see him?
Ugh. This type of guy bugs me. I don't expect a tuxedo and a dozen roses every day, but at least put half as much effort as I am into getting ready.
OP, perhaps I'm the very same man whom you've been dating? Other than the part about "passive aggressive texts", he and I would have behaved identically.
The very fact that two people with romantic intent have shared 5 contiguous dates IMPLIES exclusivity. It may or may not imply eventual sexual contact, but it most certainly implies that other options – whether scarce or profuse – have been suspended.
If a woman has had 5 dates with a man (or alternatively, a man had 5 dates with a woman), while dating others – would she/he also have had 5 dates with those others? What, are we automotive journalists doing test-drives of new cars, for a comparison-report in the newspaper?
Getting to know a guy and deciding he's not for you is now apparently a Character Flaw.
She could have just broken up with him. There was no need to go extra steps to hurt him more.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
