Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-31-2011, 04:18 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,389,418 times
Reputation: 4113

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSoul View Post
IF... we were to accept as some in this thread are arguing... that homosexuality ("sexual relations with persons of the same sex") is nature's doing, why don't we just blame all behavior on nature? If it is accepted that one can't help how they act, they were just "born" that way... what does that imply for those with other sexual deviations?

"Recent changes in the APA's diagnostic manual may have encouraged pedophile advocates."
The APA's and the Pedophilia Controversy

"The Movement to Legitimize Pedophilia

In 1981, Dr. Theo Sandfort, co-director of the research program of the Department of Gay and Lesbian Studies at the University of Utrecht, Netherlands, interviewed 25 boys aged 10 to 16 who were currently involved in sexual relationships with adult men. The interviews took place in the homes of the men. According to Sandfort, "For virtually all the boys ... the sexual contact itself was experienced positively..." Could an adult-child sexual contact, then, truly be called positive for the child? Based on the research presented, Sandfort answered that question in the affirmative."
On the Pedophilia Issue: What the APA Should Have Known
What does this wildly inaccurate misinformation from a homophobic fringe group like NARTH (who are well known for distorting facts) have to do with the OP's question about homosexuality being nature's way of population control?

And what does pedophilia have to do with homosexuality?

This seems to be just another excuse for a "smear and fear" rant to vilify gay people - and has nothing at all to do with the OP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-31-2011, 04:35 AM
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
2,705 posts, read 3,121,690 times
Reputation: 865
Quote:
Originally Posted by northstar22 View Post
This whole discussion is another reason why I reject the idea of a personal god. Why would an omnipotent creator be so concerned with the sex lives of human beings? Especially since, assuming such a creator exists, he gave those urges (whether gay or straight) to people. It's absurd.
It was either human sexuality as we know or binary fission (dividing like amoebas).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2011, 04:46 AM
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
2,705 posts, read 3,121,690 times
Reputation: 865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
And what does pedophilia have to do with homosexuality?
I think the above poster was trying to point out that homosexuality and pedophilia are related in that they both describe human sexual behaviour. If a person is homosexual from birth, the same can be safely assumed when it comes to the kiddie-fiddlers. There is a lot of inneundo going around that would equate homosexuality with pedophilia, but the moral equivalency just isn't there. It can be insinuated, but it isn't there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2011, 05:03 AM
 
570 posts, read 733,867 times
Reputation: 76
It is not about hate ,When you think that this behavior is wrong it does not mean you hate anyone .
It is only a matter of opinion...
There is wright & wrong .. nothing in between ...
If a sexual relationship between men and women is wright & normal then the sexual relationship between same-sex must be wrong & of curse not normal ...
As far as I know there is no such thing as homosexual genes it mean that this behavior comes from experiencess and surrounding circumstances .
That behavior often (not always) comes with someone Male/Female who has lived in feminine/masculine vicinity or exposed to a sexual experience with the same sex at a young age .
Hermaphrodite ...now that is something else .

Last edited by squall-lionheart; 10-31-2011 at 06:17 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2011, 05:51 AM
 
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,076,059 times
Reputation: 11862
The majority of these animals having homosexual sex are also having heterosexual sex, as far as I'm aware. Pure homosexuality does exist in nature bit it's rarer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2011, 05:56 AM
 
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,076,059 times
Reputation: 11862
I don't think homosexuals have any impact on population control. The fastest growing countries tend to be the least tolerant of homosexuality anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2011, 07:44 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,389,418 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by squall-lionheart View Post
It is not about hate ,When you think that this behavior is wrong it does not mean you hate anyone .
It is only a matter of opinion...
There is wright & wrong .. nothing in between ...
If a sexual relationship between men and women is wright & normal then the sexual relationship between same-sex must be wrong & of curse not normal ...
As far as I know there is no such thing as homosexual genes it mean that this behavior comes from experiencess and surrounding circumstances .
That behavior often (not always) comes with someone Male/Female who has lived in feminine/masculine vicinity or exposed to a sexual experience with the same sex at a young age .
Hermaphrodite ...now that is something else .
Again, what does wildly misinformed post this have to do with the OP's question? I suppose my response will end up deleted, if off-topic posts are being deleted. But anyway....

How are hate and bigotry NOT involved when someone deliberately chooses disreputable, discredited, non-evidence based anti-gay propaganda articles as sources of their misinformation, over reputable, peer-reviewed evidence based information sources. The facts from reputable sources are easy to find.

This strongly suggests that this choice reflects a person's need to vilify gay people rather find out the facts.

Many of the sources of misinformation about gay people and homosexuality have been categorised as 'hate' groups BECAUSE they have a known history of "propagation of known falsehoods — claims about LGBT people that have been thoroughly discredited by scientific authorities — and repeated, groundless name-calling. Viewing homosexuality as unbiblical does not qualify organizations for listing as hate groups."

18 Anti-Gay Groups and Their Propaganda | Southern Poverty Law Center
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2011, 07:46 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,389,418 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trimac20 View Post
The majority of these animals having homosexual sex are also having heterosexual sex, as far as I'm aware. Pure homosexuality does exist in nature bit it's rarer.
There are animals that pair for life.

http://www.amazon.com/Biological-Exu.../dp/0312192398
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2011, 08:06 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,389,418 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theophane View Post
I think the above poster was trying to point out that homosexuality and pedophilia are related in that they both describe human sexual behaviour. If a person is homosexual from birth, the same can be safely assumed when it comes to the kiddie-fiddlers. There is a lot of inneundo going around that would equate homosexuality with pedophilia, but the moral equivalency just isn't there. It can be insinuated, but it isn't there.
Yes I agree with you that "There is a lot of inneundo going around that would equate homosexuality with pedophilia, but the moral equivalency just isn't there"

Heterosexuality describes human sexual behavior as well. And considering the vast majority of regressed pedophiles (those who also have adult sexual attractions) who molest either girls or boys are heterosexuals, it seems rather disingenuous to try to use homosexuals as a comparison, does it not?

Since a large percentage of pedophiles (percentages range from aorund 25-75% depending on the study) were sexually abused themselves as children, and many have early brain injuries, or have co-morbid psychiatric disorders, no, it's not really 'safe' to assume that pedophiles are pedophiles from birth. There is some evidence that some pedophiles have some brain abnormalities in areas similiar to those shown in people with other addictions. None of this applies to homosexuals. Studies show there is no evidence that child sexual abuse or the way a child is raised causes them to be homosexual, and that homosexuality is not a mental illness.
If you want studies and articles from reputable peer-reviewed sources, I can back this up (and have on many occasions).

Pedophilia is a paraphilia. Heterosexuality and homosexuality are sexual orientations.

Equating or comparing homosexuals to pedophiles is just a typical "smear and fear" tactic by those who appear to have a strong need to spread misinformation to vilify gay people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2011, 08:16 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,778,898 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theophane View Post
I think the above poster was trying to point out that homosexuality and pedophilia are related in that they both describe human sexual behaviour. If a person is homosexual from birth, the same can be safely assumed when it comes to the kiddie-fiddlers. There is a lot of inneundo going around that would equate homosexuality with pedophilia, but the moral equivalency just isn't there. It can be insinuated, but it isn't there.
No, actually the poster like most people ignorant of homosexuality, is probably equating pedophilia with homosexuals and assume most pedophiles are gay, when in fact the overwhelming majority are heterosexual.

It's a method of further demonizing gay people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top