Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Maybe 'god' just always ever has been and never did not exist?
Even Tom Campbell's idea of 'god' is complex but cannot answer the 'who made god' question. According to him, consciousness evolved from something called 'The Void'...go figure... but as far as complex theories go, it is an interesting one.
The simplicity of 'God did it' cannot be bettered. The lack of any explanation or mechanism or indeed thought behind the Goddunnit claim sets it apart from the various suggestions about how it started here - alien scientists, panspermia or abiogenesis.
How it appeared on the Other planet? Abiogenesis, in a way far more obvious and demonstrable than it is here. That'll do as a possible explanation. If you can't disprove it, it must be true, isn't that the way it works?
I tend to think that a natural Abiogenesis here is more likely, but really any of those three is a better explanation than a complex cosmic creating being that didn't itself need to come from anywhere.
And finally am I ever going to get a response to the nativity question? No? You are going to ignore it rather than admit that you can't answer it? Am I right?
(Type in Pasteur Suppressed, Im on mobile an cant copy paste)
Abiogenesis is a rename of a much older theory, one called spontaneous generation. Now if you really do the research, you might find that Pasteur swept the idea under the rug. That spontaneous generation does happen or rather, fermentation can create life. Pasteur however suppressed such findings as in his words "only God can create life". The thing is, this is exactly what happens. Life is not created in a controlled lab environment (it will starve with only the scientist to watch it) but rather releasing it to nature. That is we can start the process because we are co-creators but ultimately it's something that operates out of our control. Trust me, I make pickles and kimchi as a hobby, it isn't an exact science. Unless you do everything sterile, and then you don't have real kimchi anyway.
But I'm getting off track. Science has helped Pasteur hide his dark past by claiming life does not exist. So we either accept that while flies may not come from nowhere, scientists were hiding something, in which case trust in what they have to say is wrong. Or that they are making a mistake, and a comet hitting the earth did not create life, but rather gave the microbes needed radiation/atomic materialsto evolve. In which case, their thinking is wrong and we can no longer trust them anyway.
no reason or popped out of nothing is as good as god to me. we have to look around and describe what we think happened based on how we see things are working. We have nothing else to use.
And for no-Christ sake keep philosophers out of the discussion. Theologies or otherwise. they do nothing but butcher the poo out of finding any reasonable conclusion.
no reason or popped out of nothing is as good as god to me. we have to look around and describe what we think happened based on how we see things are working. We have nothing else to use.
And for no-Christ sake keep philosophers out of the discussion. Theologies or otherwise. they do nothing but butcher the poo out of finding any reasonable conclusion.
*chuckles* What 'reasonable answers' can one even expect to find?
'goddunnit' or 'itdunititself' are 'reasonable answers'?
*chuckles harder*
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.