Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jeff, I ask you yet again for the third time since you've ignored the previous two times this has been posed directly to you. What is the grammatical difference between these two sentences;
You've already starting the conversation on a bad note with these claims that I'm ignoring your posts. Hey could it be that I'm simply buried in responses and don't have time or energy to respond to everyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mugg Mann
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion"
--and--
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of a religion"
The second part of the question is simple. Which one of those sentences are found verbatim in the ultimate law of the land, the United States Constitution?
How about you just tell me what you are getting at? This smells like a trap question to me. This is the text of the first amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]"
So I don't know where you are seeing a difference.
You've already starting the conversation on a bad note with these claims that I'm ignoring your posts. Hey could it be that I'm simply buried in responses and don't have time or energy to respond to everyone?
How about you just tell me what you are getting at? This smells like a trap question to me. This is the text of the first amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]"
So I don't know where you are seeing a difference.
No the couple is FORCING THEIR BELIEFS on her. What part of that do you not get? They are part of the group who came along and demanded that society change our long held traditional beliefs. They can get licenses elsewhere. Not good enough for them. Everyone must submit. Just like Communism.
I think she also wanted to stay out of jail. Sitting in the pokey and eating off a tray takes the shine off martyrdom real quick.
She said she never wanted the attention or be portrayed as a hero or martyr.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
