Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not knocking on doors, then they are Not following in the disciples footsteps of Acts 20:20 B.
Interesting that when it comes to selling your possessions and giving money to the poor, THAT is only meant for the person being directly addressed but when it comes to knocking on doors and irritating people, THAT is meant for all Christians.
I am not allergic to science. I posted about science AND religion. It was closed in this forum because it's partly about science. It would be closed in the science forum because it's partly about religion.
Except you was misrepresenting a scientific theory backed up by evidence with no mention of religion, which you could do in the science section.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good4Nothin
Some people here seem not to understand that the RELATIONSHIPS between science and religion are important topics.
More misrepresentation and an implied ad hominem. I do understand the RELATIONSHIP (and it is not good for religion). Except you have provided no evidence for your ersatz god, all you have done is misrepresent the science.
Some people here seem not to understand that the RELATIONSHIPS between science and religion are important topics.
Other than being in conflict mostly, just what is the relationship you mention? And which religion or religions?
You're being so vague it's like asking when you should prune a bush without knowing what kind of bush it is or what climate it's in
Other than being in conflict mostly, just what is the relationship you mention? And which religion or religions?
You're being so vague it's like asking when you should prune a bush without knowing what kind of bush it is or what climate it's in
It is called NOMA, where science can not answer questions about any god because it shows (up to this time) no need for a god. So the two are separate, as this allows the gap for a god to hide in. But if science DID show evidence for a god, then it would be accepted. Until some evidence is found, creationists of all types have to either misrepresent or invent scientific facts for their god, because they have to sell their DVDs.
So are people who believe in a conscious universe. And as we outnumber them, they are the pitiful minority.
We represent a newer way of thinking, which has not yet become the dominant scientific perspective. But it will. Probably not until all the materialist scientists have died.
That's funny, I wondered the same thing about you.
Really? Based on what?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
