Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yet you are the one throwing punches at every one.
No one should have to punch anyone to discuss "The Shroud of Turin" etc., but it's as if some posters have a fetish spamming with their opposition incessantly throughout the threads, and if all fails, claim the discussion is a threat to mankind and you are some how saving the world by having the thread closed, instead learning about what's all out there....oh! that's right because you already know it all.
No one should have to punch anyone to discuss "The Shroud of Turin" etc., but it's as if some posters have a fetish spamming with their opposition incessantly throughout the threads, and if all fails, claim the discussion is a threat to mankind and you are some how saving the world by having the thread closed, instead learning about what's all out there....oh! that's right because you already know it all.
Do you mean like those bolded examples of hyperbole?
1) if you had bothered to investigate this for yourself, this video has been refuted so often by actual historians and scientists it does not need us to do this again.
2) I refuted this video last year after Pneuma spent 3 weeks writing a load of dishonest rubbish about Josephus, and included this video. I took 5 hours to refute his whole 3 weeks work (and that included my midday meal and taking my grandmothers dog for a walk).
3) Many people are not expert enough to spot the astronomical and science errors in the video.
4) You are presuming everyone bothers to read your posts or can be bothered to respond. I only saw your post because someone else responded to it. And it was not Arach, so THAT statement of yours is false.
5) Poisoning the well and straw men are fallacies.
6) If you really want people to respond, why do you not start your own thread? I will definitely give you more history and science than you may have wanted.
yeah, you'll give it alright. so long as science swings towards anti-god or lines up with harry's agenda you will even agree with it.
Priorities indeed. We have them, unlike your straw man view of atheists.
lmao ... you make up anything you need at anytime you need. weather is valid or not is irreverent to you.
you are the one with with straw man arguments.
his main premises are that atheist should apply the same rigor to their statement of belief about god as theist do. And that we (atheist) should set up to the plate and offer counter claims past "youre wrong theist".
Do you mean like those bolded examples of hyperbole?
petti, please start a thread about the R/S topics you'd like to discuss?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
