Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-31-2015, 02:13 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644

Advertisements

I retired 25 years ago. I set aside as much as I could, without excessively eroding he opportunities to do the things I'm (in retrospect) thankful that I did.

The goal is not to fix an amount in mind and deprive yourself in order to reach it. The goal is to establish attainable life goals, achieve the ones that are important to you, and live frugally enough to pay for what you need and save what you can, and reduce nonproductive waste to near zero. .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-31-2015, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,907,290 times
Reputation: 32530
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
i saw today on tv washington dc is the most expensive place to raise a family followed by

long island
westchester
nyc

we came in 2nd place as living in the 2nd most expensive place in the country .
I would be willing to bet that Boston, Honolulu, and San Francisco are very, very close behind, in no particular order. And I am fairly certain that Los Angeles and San Diego are in the top dozen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2015, 03:52 PM
 
106,673 posts, read 108,856,202 times
Reputation: 80164
they just released the top 4 since our area was 3 of them . not sure what the latest other ones would be .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2015, 05:41 PM
 
2,560 posts, read 2,302,327 times
Reputation: 3214
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
in the 1990's 1 out of 4 retirees who moved out of state went to florida . today fewer and fewer retirees are moving far . florida now gets only 1 out 7 retirees .

less than 2% even cross state lines anymore .
The 2% quote is a litttttle hard to believe. I'm one of the 2 percenters I guess!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2015, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Northern IL
241 posts, read 272,682 times
Reputation: 481
Our goal is 2-2.5 mil with a very small pension and SS. Retiring at 60/65 and self insuring for LTC.

We want to snowbird between WI and FL and will own both homes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2015, 10:56 PM
 
Location: Texas
133 posts, read 175,423 times
Reputation: 353
I planned on retiring in 4 years at the age of 59.5. My number factors in taking SS at age 62. I've lived neither frugally nor on the high side. Plain old luck resulted in a few good real estate purchases that helped me reach my number.

Unfortunately, last month I was diagnosed with a treatable but incurable disease that may require retirement earlier than expected and comes with an extremely high cost of annual treatment. I'm still in a state of shock so haven't looked at the medical policy to see what percentage, if any, I would be responsible for.

For some reason this scenario never crossed my mind. Just the possibility of growing old and maybe needing somebody to come in daily to help around the house.

I even had 2 backup plans that included working part-time for a few years if necessary. Time to get the eraser out and come up with a different backup plan that factors in an inability to work even part-time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2015, 01:24 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
4,490 posts, read 3,930,229 times
Reputation: 14538
I'm 63 and every retirement calculator I've found says I can retire now and have enough to reach 90. I'm still going to wait until 66 so the SS kicks in, I've got $ 2,700/mo coming. Better safe than sorry and I like my work anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2015, 06:39 AM
 
810 posts, read 1,182,017 times
Reputation: 1600
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlimMoeDee View Post
I planned on retiring in 4 years at the age of 59.5. My number factors in taking SS at age 62. I've lived neither frugally nor on the high side. Plain old luck resulted in a few good real estate purchases that helped me reach my number.

Unfortunately, last month I was diagnosed with a treatable but incurable disease that may require retirement earlier than expected and comes with an extremely high cost of annual treatment. I'm still in a state of shock so haven't looked at the medical policy to see what percentage, if any, I would be responsible for.

For some reason this scenario never crossed my mind. Just the possibility of growing old and maybe needing somebody to come in daily to help around the house.

I even had 2 backup plans that included working part-time for a few years if necessary. Time to get the eraser out and come up with a different backup plan that factors in an inability to work even part-time.
I am very sorry to hear about your disease. It does change the plan. We never thought my husband would get laid off at almost 61. I planned and planned and checked the retirement calculators and when to take SS. So, this threw a big wrench in our plans as well. It's almost like GPS. Y'know, when you go on a different road than they say and you hear "re-routing, re-routing"...well, that's what we have to do!!

As far as your medical treatment and the high cost...I am still in shock over what we pay a year in just health insurance. Never did I think in all my planning that it would surpass what we ever paid even in a mortgage!

Best of luck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2015, 06:59 AM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,799,048 times
Reputation: 6550
I have 2 plans. My job is almost certain to go away in 2-3 years and it's also likely that I will have a short period of unemployment and then take significantly less than what I make now. So I have the "7 years of the same" plan, which is probably a fantasy, and the "3 years same and 4 years reduced" plan. Both will work okay but I am likely to do winter warm trips in a trailer in the second scenario. I am more than okay with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2015, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Minnesota
110 posts, read 153,973 times
Reputation: 331
My wife and I will both have pensions of about $3300 a month and social security of about 1600 a month taken at 62. All of which have inflation adjustments and a pension that continues on for the survivor. So hopefully $9800 a month is enough of an income stream to live comfortably.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top