Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-23-2015, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,461,491 times
Reputation: 4395

Advertisements

This is a new breakthrough that is good.


Palo Alto, CA - June 22, 2015 - D-Wave Systems Inc., the world's first quantum computing company, today announced that it has broken the 1000 qubit barrier, developing a processor about double the size of D-Wave’s previous generation and far exceeding the number of qubits ever developed by D-Wave or any other quantum effort. This is a major technological and scientific achievement that will allow significantly more complex computational problems to be solved than was possible on any previous quantum computer.

D-Wave’s quantum computer runs a quantum annealing algorithm to find the lowest points, corresponding to optimal or near optimal solutions, in a virtual “energy landscape.” Every additional qubit doubles the search space of the processor. At 1000 qubits, the new processor considers 21000 possibilities simultaneously, a search space which dwarfs the 2512 possibilities available to the 512-qubit D-Wave Two. ‪In fact, the new search space contains far more possibilities than there are ‪particles in the observable universe.

The link: D-Wave Systems Breaks the 1000 Qubit Quantum Computing Barrier | D-Wave Systems
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2015, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,461,491 times
Reputation: 4395
One of my main goals is to be transhuman by 2030 and this article is just a example of why I am able to have that goal.


Humans will become hybrids by 2030, says leading Google engineer, with tiny robots scurrying around our brain to help us think

The link: Humans will become hybrids by 2030, says leading Google engineer, with tiny robots scurrying around our brain to help us think - News - Gadgets and Tech - The Independent
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2015, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,461,491 times
Reputation: 4395
People have asked how will it be possible for us to connect to the technology? Well we are starting to figure it out!


SWEDISH SCIENTISTS BUILD ARTIFICIAL NEURONS ABLE TO COMMUNICATE WITH ORGANIC NEURONS

Scientists at Karolinska Institutet in Sweden have built a fully functional neuron by using organic bioelectronics. This artificial neuron contain no "living" parts, but is capable of mimicking the function of a human nerve cell and communicate in the same way as our own neurons do.

The link: https://hacked.com/swedish-scientist...ganic-neurons/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2015, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Elgin, Illinois
1,200 posts, read 1,604,922 times
Reputation: 407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josseppie View Post
One of my main goals is to be transhuman by 2030 and this article is just a example of why I am able to have that goal.


Humans will become hybrids by 2030, says leading Google engineer, with tiny robots scurrying around our brain to help us think

The link: Humans will become hybrids by 2030, says leading Google engineer, with tiny robots scurrying around our brain to help us think - News - Gadgets and Tech - The Independent
The title of article is misleading, Ray says 2030s so it can be any date from 2030-2039 when such tech appears. However, I doubt most people would trust such tech in the beginning; considering all the hacking that has been going on and the trouble Google has gotten into with the European Union in regards to them manipulating searches, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2015, 04:37 PM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,461,491 times
Reputation: 4395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canaan-84 View Post
The title of article is misleading, Ray says 2030s so it can be any date from 2030-2039 when such tech appears. However, I doubt most people would trust such tech in the beginning; considering all the hacking that has been going on and the trouble Google has gotten into with the European Union in regards to them manipulating searches, etc.
2030 is the start of the so called nanotech revolution. However if you look at what is coming in the next 5-10 years we will already start to merge with the internet so by 2030 I can see starting to merge with nanotech computers although it will be more expensive and become for affordable as the decade goes on. So maybe the 1% first then quickly more and more people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2015, 05:33 PM
 
Location: North Central Florida
6,218 posts, read 7,729,420 times
Reputation: 3939
Why would anyone want to turn themselves into a machine?


CN.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2015, 05:57 AM
 
Location: Kent, Ohio
3,429 posts, read 2,733,461 times
Reputation: 1667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Compression View Post
Why would anyone want to turn themselves into a machine?
CN.......
We've already started. Artificial hearts, hip replacements, etc. The list is already quite long. As for why, the answers seem obvious: People want to live longer and have a better quality of life. But perhaps the major key is that the line between "biology" and "machine" will continue to blur. You won't just wake up one day and be composed of plastic and metal. Being "artificial" does not necessarily imply being "non-biological". There are gradations on a spectrum. And you probably wont' have an obvious choice like "Do you want to be a machine?" The transformation process will mostly sneak up on us, just as it is doing right now - albeit at an increasing faster rate.

Something else to consider: It is possible that "being a machine" and "being an old-fashioned human" might not feel so radically different for many people - aside from some overall improvements to bodily functions. It's hard to tell, at the moment, what it would be like to be mostly composed of artificial parts, but the main point is that your "humanity" and "sense of self" etc., probably depend on more than just the history of the parts you are composed of. There might be thresholds in the transformation process, or there might be virtually infinite degrees in the transformation of "essence" or identity. We don't have good enough theories to answer these questions at the moment.

If you could look better, feel better, and live longer, wouldn't you want to do so? Most people would. So the answer to your "why" question is easy. The harder question is whether - or to what extent - our "essential selves" will survive the transformation to fully artificial form. That's a huge question mark at the moment.

Last edited by Gaylenwoof; 06-30-2015 at 06:07 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2015, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Elgin, Illinois
1,200 posts, read 1,604,922 times
Reputation: 407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaylenwoof View Post
We've already started. Artificial hearts, hip replacements, etc. The list is already quite long. As for why, the answers seem obvious: People want to live longer and have a better quality of life. But perhaps the major key is that the line between "biology" and "machine" will continue to blur. You won't just wake up one day and be composed of plastic and metal. Being "artificial" does not necessarily imply being "non-biological". There are gradations on a spectrum. And you probably wont' have an obvious choice like "Do you want to be a machine?" The transformation process will mostly sneak up on us, just as it is doing right now - albeit at an increasing faster rate.

Something else to consider: It is possible that "being a machine" and "being an old-fashioned human" might not feel so radically different for many people - aside from some overall improvements to bodily functions. It's hard to tell, at the moment, what it would be like to be mostly composed of artificial parts, but the main point is that your "humanity" and "sense of self" etc., probably depend on more than just the history of the parts you are composed of. There might be thresholds in the transformation process, or there might be virtually infinite degrees in the transformation of "essence" or identity. We don't have good enough theories to answer these questions at the moment.

If you could look better, feel better, and live longer, wouldn't you want to do so? Most people would. So the answer to your "why" question is easy. The harder question is whether - or to what extent - our "essential selves" will survive the transformation to fully artificial form. That's a huge question mark at the moment.
Artificial hearts are currently temporary though, for those who need a transplant but don't have a donor at hand. People with them rarely live more than a few months. I also wouldn't go as far as calling those people cyborgs or hybrids.

Also would becoming machines really be necessary for immortality? Some of these researchers believe that nanotechnology could make us immortal without turning us into cyborgs or full fledged machines. The idea is having nanobots flowing through our blood with the task of monitoring our cells, tissues, organs and repairing or eliminating any threat our body sustains.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2015, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,461,491 times
Reputation: 4395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canaan-84 View Post
Artificial hearts are currently temporary though, for those who need a transplant but don't have a donor at hand. People with them rarely live more than a few months. I also wouldn't go as far as calling those people cyborgs or hybrids.

Also would becoming machines really be necessary for immortality? Some of these researchers believe that nanotechnology could make us immortal without turning us into cyborgs or full fledged machines. The idea is having nanobots flowing through our blood with the task of monitoring our cells, tissues, organs and repairing or eliminating any threat our body sustains.
That is still by definition transhuman as we transcend our biology and that is all most people like me are looking to do, at least for now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2015, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Southeast Michigan
2,851 posts, read 2,302,319 times
Reputation: 4546
Immorality is economically unsustainable for most of the Earth inhabitants, and there's also the fact that your brain aging can't at the present be reversed and so limits the lifespan of an individual.

As things progress, I can see a small percentage of super rich becoming immortal gods and the rest of humanity becoming irrelevant and obsolete. Welcome to the great tomorrow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top