Refuting 9/11 Conspiracy Theory

[markjames68]

Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801

There are also other obvious questions if you want it to have been a controlled demolition, such as, when the burning jet fuel shot down the elevator shafts and sent fireballs flying through the Concourse, and the buildings shuddered and jerked wildly upon the impact of the planes, why didn't the explosives go off for another hour or so?

There are some that of course question that jets ever flew into the WTC. And of course those fireballs were just special effects.

These are all people who have viewed videos from the comfort of their armchairs and probably weren't within 100 miles of Manhattan at the time.

Had I been in the office instead of flying that day I would have been a couple of blocks away on Broadway on the 49th or 50th floor with a direct view of the towers. Some in my office saw the first plane hit. EVERYONE saw the second plane hit.

As always, Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is that terrorists took advantage of a weak security posture and commandeered jets, crashing them into buildings. It's a lot more believable than government conspiracies, controlled demolitions and big coverups. We got caught with our pants down after the USS Cole incident and shame on us.

[thecoalman]

Originally Posted by markjames68

Why should conspiracy crackpots be given access?

Why would you consider it a conspiracy theory when it would be debunking them? They were not suggesting this was planned but instead an unforeseen consequence of flying two jets full of fuel into a building. You need three things; heat, a lot of aluminum and water. All three things are present, the only thing you need to assume past that point is that enough molten metal came into contact with water.

I think you're hiding something in your house. Please let me in so I can inspect it. That's the attitude they take, and it's wrong.

That is not the attitude they had it was more of long the lines is this is something that may have happened that could explain any explosions.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gui_ATdfHx4







Here is some video/news report from an accident that occurred in Georgia at an aluminum plant.

Aluminum plant explosion - Video | WAGA

[markjames68]

Originally Posted by thecoalman

Why would you consider it a conspiracy theory when it would be debunking them? They were not suggesting this was planned but instead an unforeseen consequence of flying two jets full of fuel into a building. You need three things; heat, a lot of aluminum and water. All three things are present, the only thing you need to assume past that point is that enough molten metal came into contact with water.



That is not the attitude they had it was more of long the lines is this is something that may have happened that could explain any explosions.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gui_ATdfHx4







Here is some video/news report from an accident that occurred in Georgia at an aluminum plant.

Aluminum plant explosion - Video | WAGA

Thanks for clarifying, what you say makes sense. When I read your other post I had thought the references to “explosions” was due to planted explosives, not due to the presence of aircraft aluminum.