Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Compromise geographically between political powers in Eastern & Western SD????
The matter was voted on a couple times since statehood. It was quite the contest between Pierre, Mitchell and Huron. It was hotly contested issue. The matter was put to a vote and Pierre won. Geography was one of the main selling points. That being said, east river holds the majority of the state's population. East river tends to hold more clout.
Now when I have to head to Pierre it is a 3 hour drive instead of a 6 hours. So we can all be equally annoyed.
The matter was voted on a couple times since statehood. It was quite the contest between Pierre, Mitchell and Huron. It was hotly contested issue. The matter was put to a vote and Pierre won. Geography was one of the main selling points. That being said, east river holds the majority of the state's population. East river tends to hold more clout.
Now when I have to head to Pierre it is a 3 hour drive instead of a 6 hours. So we can all be equally annoyed.
Yankton (the old territorial capital) and Sioux Falls were also in the running back when this location decision was made. Sioux Falls even had a location picked out on the east side of town near where the old Austad's corporate headquarters used to be. To this day this residential/commercial area is called Capital Hill Addition.
Central location was the primary reason for Pierre as it was for Bismarck in North Dakota once both areas were separated prior to both becoming states.
I remember hearing that the US president at the time of statehood was the only person who knew the order in which each were given statehood to alleviate any fighting about it between the new states. If this isn't true, it's still a cool story. I'm too lazy to research this and have to get back to work. I'll leave this to UH, EH, or SD 4020 to see if my memory is any good.
I'm glad the capital is in Pierre. We've got too much goose doo doo around Sioux Falls as it is.
Yankton (the old territorial capital) and Sioux Falls were also in the running back when this location decision was made. Sioux Falls even had a location picked out on the east side of town near where the old Austad's corporate headquarters used to be. To this day this residential/commercial area is called Capital Hill Addition.
Central location was the primary reason for Pierre as it was for Bismarck in North Dakota once both areas were separated prior to both becoming states.
I remember hearing that the US president at the time of statehood was the only person who knew the order in which each were given statehood to alleviate any fighting about it between the new states. If this isn't true, it's still a cool story. I'm too lazy to research this and have to get back to work. I'll leave this to UH, EH, or SD 4020 to see if my memory is any good.
I'm glad the capital is in Pierre. We've got too much goose doo doo around Sioux Falls as it is.
The president that signed us into statehood was Benjamin Harrison. It is rumored that papers were shuffled. It is why North Dakota is the 42nd and South Dakota the 43rd. Yes, you are correct.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.