Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Space
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-22-2017, 05:41 PM
 
12,016 posts, read 12,760,107 times
Reputation: 13420

Advertisements

Does it mean we would need to travel for 4 years at the speed of light, if it were possible, in order to get there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-22-2017, 05:55 PM
 
Location: SC
8,793 posts, read 8,164,508 times
Reputation: 12992
That's my understanding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 03:47 AM
 
Location: Bel Air, California
23,766 posts, read 29,058,499 times
Reputation: 37337
without taking any short cuts
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 04:38 AM
 
Location: Tricity, PL
61,721 posts, read 87,123,005 times
Reputation: 131695
Yeah, per definition: 1 light year is an unit of length that light travels in one year; equal to just under 10 trillion kilometres (or about 6 trillion miles)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 07:13 AM
 
Location: God's Gift to Mankind for flying anything
5,921 posts, read 13,856,642 times
Reputation: 5229
Quote:
Originally Posted by elnina View Post
Yeah, per definition: 1 light year is an unit of length that light travels in one year; equal to just under 10 trillion kilometres (or about 6 trillion miles)
Only valid during off-hours (!) or when there is no accident on the way, because of people rubbernecking ...

ghe ghe ghe ghe ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,814,649 times
Reputation: 40166
Quote:
Originally Posted by LifeIsGood01 View Post
Does it mean we would need to travel for 4 years at the speed of light, if it were possible, in order to get there?
Well, technically it would take at least slightly more than four years because the speed of light is unobtainable for us non-photons.

The term light-year can be deceptive because at a layman's first glance it intuitively appears to be a measurement of time but rather it is one of distance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 08:46 AM
 
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
3,565 posts, read 2,116,169 times
Reputation: 4384
The only thing I can't quite get my head round is that if you can travel at the speed of light, it should indeed take 4 years to get there, at least from the pov of someone based on Earth. But would it take 4 years if you were actually on the spacecraft given that if you are travelling at that speed you could witness a change in Time/Space, so that it just "seems" like 4 years, when in fact it is actually less than that!

Something to do with Einstein's Law of Special Relativity, I think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 08:51 AM
 
Location: On the road
2,798 posts, read 2,677,083 times
Reputation: 3192
The thing is that accelerating to the SoL will take some pretty significant time. It's not like tromping the gas when the light turns green and hitting top speed in a few seconds. The energy it will take to reach the speed of light will be pretty significant. And then, of course, once you get there, you have to decelerate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 12:30 PM
 
28,803 posts, read 47,699,483 times
Reputation: 37905
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarsMac View Post
The thing is that accelerating to the SoL will take some pretty significant time. It's not like tromping the gas when the light turns green and hitting top speed in a few seconds. The energy it will take to reach the speed of light will be pretty significant. And then, of course, once you get there, you have to decelerate.
Ramp up to the speed of light. At the halfway point turn around and decelerate the rest of the way. I'd guess more like 10 years at least.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 01:17 PM
 
Location: On the road
2,798 posts, read 2,677,083 times
Reputation: 3192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tek_Freek View Post
Ramp up to the speed of light. At the halfway point turn around and decelerate the rest of the way. I'd guess more like 10 years at least.
So, I guess if you have a known mass of the craft to be used, and a known thrust rate capability, you could calculate how far you can go in acceleration, and at what point you need to begin deceleration.
Problem at this time is the need for fuel, and the mass of the fuel figures in, as well, but then as it diminishes, the rate if consumption has to figure in. Especially in the deceleration stage. So it won't actually be physical half-way point, I think.

Definitely going to be a while before we are truly ready for interstellar travel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Space
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top