Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-02-2012, 08:35 PM
 
Location: SoCal
1,242 posts, read 1,947,647 times
Reputation: 848

Advertisements

Think about it. Take the Burj Khalifa for example, great looking building by itself but it looks ridiculous next to everything else. It's 1,500 ft too tall! When I see a picture of Dubai not only do I wanna puke because that barren ****hole now gets mentioned with all the great skyscraper cities like NY, Hong Kong, Chicago...etc but I'm actually creeped out by looking at how disproportionately massive that thing is.

My point is, when is a building too damn tall? Personally I don't see the point in building above 2,000ft, it just becomes excessive and turns into some expensive affectation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-02-2012, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Limbo
6,512 posts, read 7,550,899 times
Reputation: 6319
The architect must be overcompensating for something!

I agree, the Burj just looks ridiculous, even with those other 1,000 footers around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 09:13 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,312,844 times
Reputation: 13298
Yea that thing is too tall. But there too short everywhere else in America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 09:40 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,698,612 times
Reputation: 3668
I agree... anything above 2000ft both looks absolutely ridiculous and really doesn't serve any purpose. There is no way there is demand to build a 3,500 foot building in the middle of a desert when a city like NYC (Manhattan) which is landlocked doesn't even have a building higher than 2,000 feet.... other countries will soon learn that it's not easy to be a superpower.

They're just showing off though and putting their selves into debt. The Burj Khalifa is what? 10% filled? At most? Ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 09:45 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,704,020 times
Reputation: 5872
Yeah, Dubai is to busy trying to impress, instead of creating structures according to need. Burj is actually pretty useless from what i've hear. With the way Emirates are spending money on skyscrapers like Burj, that place is bound to fall.

I think a skyline looks good when its balance. For example, Okc built that rediculous looking Devon tower and the skyline just looks weird no.

My point is, you know when a tower is too tall when other buildings are hard to notice...imo atleast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 09:58 PM
 
Location: SoCal
1,242 posts, read 1,947,647 times
Reputation: 848
Yeah, I mean what type of sustainable economy can Dubai have? Exporting Dates? Sand? Once the oil runs out what's gonna happen? And I agree completely that a skyline should have balance. Dubais buildings are spread apart, there is so much space between them. They sit on giant footprints like suburban office parks. Dubai honestly looks like a giant Phoenix.

It's like there is NO REAL NEED to build those giant buildings and that's the troubling part. NY and Chicago had the demand and much stabler economies to do so, but Dubai is trying to hard to fit in.

Also, in the US, buildings and all structures are prohibited from being built taller than 2,063 feet. The FAA owns the airspace above that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 11:33 PM
 
Location: Cincinnati
860 posts, read 1,358,286 times
Reputation: 1130
At least they didn't go through with this:

Nakheel Tower: Al Burj



I mean, come oooooon. 4,600 feet is stupid tall. Actually, tall to the point of inconvenience.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2012, 05:55 AM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,882 posts, read 25,154,836 times
Reputation: 19083
Everything about Dubai is a hyperbole starting with the buildings. There's no need for anything that makes life more interesting than mundane, yet most of us don't live like Amish. I'm sure to the Amish we're excessive. I like Dubai's excess. I wouldn't necessarily want to live in it, but what they've done in there in 30 years is nothing short of amazing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2012, 10:15 AM
 
4,019 posts, read 3,952,731 times
Reputation: 2938
skyscrapers are an ugly eyesore at any height. by definition they are way too tall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2012, 10:38 AM
 
434 posts, read 552,468 times
Reputation: 153
I would rather see tall building after tall building in the same area instead of all of the urban or suburban sprawl that is happening in most major US cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top