Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-07-2020, 09:02 PM
 
905 posts, read 1,103,020 times
Reputation: 1186

Advertisements

Culp still refuses to concede, despite being behind by well over 500K votes...

https://komonews.com/news/elections/...ies-in-results

I'll have to agree with MaikeerinWA - If the GOP wants to win the governor's seat in WA, it's not gonna happen with candidates like Culp or Eyman. I think if someone like McKenna was running this time around, Inslee might have lost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-07-2020, 09:10 PM
 
Location: Seattle WA, USA
5,699 posts, read 4,929,764 times
Reputation: 4942
If the GOP wants to succeed in this state they will need run on a libertarian platform and concede/ignore on most of the social issues, adopt a live let live policy, focus on the economics as well as crime and homelessness, and for good measure play the identity politics game and put forward a minority candidate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2020, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Embarrassing, WA
3,405 posts, read 2,734,101 times
Reputation: 4417
It ultimately doesn't matter. It only takes a handful of counties that have the majority of the population to decide the elections (will vote Democrat always) for the rest of the state. Culp is posturing being 500k down, but the amount of votes he did capture shows that its not just a handful of people that are tired of much of the democrat games.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2020, 11:29 PM
 
Location: Seattle WA, USA
5,699 posts, read 4,929,764 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkcarguy View Post
It ultimately doesn't matter. It only takes a handful of counties that have the majority of the population to decide the elections (will vote Democrat always) for the rest of the state. Culp is posturing being 500k down, but the amount of votes he did capture shows that its not just a handful of people that are tired of much of the democrat games.
I don't think the GOP has any chance of winning King County with the current political climate, but I think they can make serious inroads in Pierce, Clark and Snohomish counties since they were pretty close this year.

If Culp was able to preform with an increase of 8% in each county on average he would've won, this is how that scenario would play out

GOP wins scenario

County | Dem Votes | % | GOP Votes | % | Difference
King | 785,276 | 66.41% | 397,129 | 33.59% | +388,151
Snohomish | 207,567 | 48.40% | 221,270 | 51.60% | -13,703
Pierce | 198,972 | 43.92% | 254,074 | 56.08% | -55,101
Clark | 115,636 | 42.97% | 153,480 | 57.03% | -37,845
Spokane | 106,946 | 36.96% | 182,417 | 63.04% | -75,471
Current Dem Counties | 1,560,420 | 54.50%| 1,302,842 | 45.50% | +257,578
Current GOP Counties | 373,235 | 34.56% | 706,580 | 65.44% | -333,345
Washington | 1,933,655 | 49.04% | 2,009,422 | 50.96% | -75,767

2020 Governors Race Results

County | Dem Votes | % | GOP Votes | % | Difference
King | 879,872 | 74.41% | 302,536 | 25.59% | +577,336
Snohomish | 241.874 | 56.40% | 186,963 | 43.60% | +54,911
Pierce | 235,216 | 56.40% | 186,963 | 43.60% | +17,386
Clark | 137,165 | 50.97% | 131,951 | 49.03% | +5,214
Spokane | 130,095 | 44.96% | 159,268 | 55.04% | -29,173
Dem Counties | 1,789,481 | 62.50% | 1,073,781 | 37.50% | +715,700
GOP Counties | 459,620 | 42.56% | 620,195 | 57.44% | -160,575
Washington | 2,249,101 | 57.04% | 1,693,976 | 42.96% | 555,125

So to reiterate, the GOP not only needs to win over more suburban voters in blue counties, particularly in Pierce, Snohomish and Clark counties, but they also need to attract more voters in their own counties , since on average they were only winning at 57%, they need +65% in their own counties, and for good measure they should be aiming for +70%.

And in order to do this the GOP needs to adopt a more libertarian platform, but with the huge PR hit with Trump, it might make more sense for the conservative politicians to abandon the GOP altogether in this state and move into the libertarian party and start fresh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2020, 06:52 AM
 
Location: Yakima yes, an apartment!
8,340 posts, read 6,787,311 times
Reputation: 15130
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthRabbit View Post
The (uninformed) vote will go to the highest spender / best Hollywood type ads, highest name recognition.

Your average USA voter likely spends ZERO time investigating candidates and policies / experience / voting history if an incumbent.

Too Bad.
Some years ago. One candidate had little money for advertising. So, 5 days before the election he went out with signs and stuck them on highways and main arterials.

He won 62% of the vote. Your claim is correct.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2020, 12:19 PM
 
1,495 posts, read 1,672,636 times
Reputation: 3662
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkcarguy View Post
It ultimately doesn't matter. It only takes a handful of counties that have the majority of the population to decide the elections (will vote Democrat always) for the rest of the state.
So democracy is working. But counties don't matter in this, it's cumulative across the whole state, so you have to have policies that work for both urbanites and rural if you want to win as a Republican. It's harder to do, but not impossible.



Quote:
Originally Posted by rkcarguy View Post
Culp is posturing being 500k down, but the amount of votes he did capture shows that its not just a handful of people that are tired of much of the democrat games.
There is always a solid 35% core on both sides who will vote for their favorite party even if the actual candidate eats babies and puppies, or is a egocentric corrupt fascist. It's only when enough of the middle ground gets persuaded that people should pay attention. Culp is at less than 43%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2020, 06:18 PM
 
1,348 posts, read 707,025 times
Reputation: 1670
wear your mask save lives
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2020, 03:27 PM
 
1,515 posts, read 1,525,830 times
Reputation: 2274
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkcarguy View Post
It ultimately doesn't matter. It only takes a handful of counties that have the majority of the population to decide the elections (will vote Democrat always) for the rest of the state. Culp is posturing being 500k down, but the amount of votes he did capture shows that its not just a handful of people that are tired of much of the democrat games.





Why is it that Trump supporters are so ignorant? If you took a basic government, you would know that 55% and over is considered a LANDSLIDE. Look at what Inslee recieved and figure out if it was a bigger number - than 55%. In SW Washington Inslee didn't bother to campaign. Many including myself thought that no one should get a third term.



My guess is you think Trump got cheated out of his election but let's stick to the main point - CULP got his ass kicked!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2020, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Embarrassing, WA
3,405 posts, read 2,734,101 times
Reputation: 4417
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestGuest View Post
Why is it that Trump supporters are so ignorant? If you took a basic government, you would know that 55% and over is considered a LANDSLIDE. Look at what Inslee recieved and figure out if it was a bigger number - than 55%. In SW Washington Inslee didn't bother to campaign. Many including myself thought that no one should get a third term.

My guess is you think Trump got cheated out of his election but let's stick to the main point - CULP got his ass kicked!
I'm looking at it in a different way. I see about 1/4 of the state that got what they wanted for a candidate, and the rest of the state didn't. I have been on both sides, and I have voted for Red and Blue candidates on the same ticket based on the policy they propose.
Regarding Trump, he's an awful man who happened to have some of the policy many felt we needed. His personality drove many away, and I knew it was going to be a close election. I was up really late watching the results and agree that there is adequate inconsistency in the numbers and that several states need a recount. Whatever the results are, will be what they will be. We've been here before with Bush/Gore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2020, 06:34 PM
 
1,515 posts, read 1,525,830 times
Reputation: 2274
[quote=rkcarguy;I'm looking at it in a different way. I see about 1/4 of the state that got what they wanted for a candidate, and the rest of the state didn't.."


-------------

You got me wrong. When I told you your last post was ignorant, I did not mean it as a challenge to come up with something even more ignorant.


Let me take you back to your High School Civics Class. The United Stats Supreme Court in the 1960's wrote Baker v Carr. You were probably so busy posting something somewhere that you missed it. Perhaps you reside in one of those rural areas, where the news hasn't hit yet.


Baker made "ONE PERSON ONE VOTE" the law of the land-it wasn't about liberal or conservatives or Red Or Blue- just about fairness.



One [B]person[/b] means exactly what it says- it does not mean one cow, one goat or even ONE ACRE of land.


So let's say I was wealthy enough to buy every piece of Washington which did not have a house or person. Perhaps I would own 3 /4 of the state. Using your logic - I should have 3/4 all the votes- hey we could save money spent on elections. I would pick who I wanted for office and just hand in my list.
Thankfully it doesnt work that way. A person living in a condo in Seattle has the same right to vote, as the guy who owns 500,000 acres. There is a term for that DEMOCRACY.


Please try to educate yourself . Go and GOOGLE Baker v Carr and read it- it has a fascinating discussion. If not go to Wiki or somewhere else. Then tell me once in for all - you understand the concept.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top