Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-09-2016, 05:09 PM
 
Location: New Hampshire
639 posts, read 579,577 times
Reputation: 1046

Advertisements

It sure worked for NH in December as far as the temp goes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-10-2016, 01:27 PM
 
29,529 posts, read 19,620,154 times
Reputation: 4543
El Niño in region 3.4 will be gone by May

https://twitter.com/jnmet/status/686280139051823106
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2016, 06:02 PM
 
Location: East Central Phoenix
8,042 posts, read 12,265,438 times
Reputation: 9835
For those who previously stated with confidence that wet weather would be noticed in January across southern CA and the SW: observe the current conditions, and the short range outlooks. No precipitation is in the forecast across much of AZ for the rest of the month, and only minimal chances in southern CA. If these short range forecasts hold true, this type of weather wouldn't even be considered "normal" ... it's below average for this time of year. So much for this super strong El Niño and the reliability of the so called "experts".
()

Climate Prediction Center - 6-10 and 8-14 Day Prognostic Discussions
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2016, 10:10 PM
 
Location: Westminster/Huntington Beach, CA
1,780 posts, read 1,761,762 times
Reputation: 1218
LA didn't record even a trace of rain from Dec. 9th 1997 until sometime in early/mid January 1998.

So even during that super El Niño episode similar things were happening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2016, 10:19 PM
 
1 posts, read 800 times
Reputation: 20
I agree that the news media has made much to do about nothing. This El Nino hype is a bad joke. It's half way through January and we are at below average rainfall for this time of the year. So Cal has only two reliable weather forcasts, cold and dry and warm and dry. Am tired of hearing them make a big deal about big systems of low pressure out in the Pacific that end up giving us at best enough drizzle to ruin a newly washed car but nothing more. Let's just call it how it is. We're not getting any rain folks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2016, 05:26 AM
 
29,529 posts, read 19,620,154 times
Reputation: 4543
MOst of the rain has been in Northern California
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2016, 06:43 AM
 
Location: New York Area
35,064 posts, read 17,014,369 times
Reputation: 30213
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
MOst of the rain has been in Northern California
Isn't that where falling rain is more important?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2016, 08:52 AM
 
29,529 posts, read 19,620,154 times
Reputation: 4543
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
Isn't that where falling rain is more important?
I'd say so. Especially the mountains where snow pack turns into water necessary for farming in the Central Valley and such.... I mean come on. SoCal is basically one big desert.


https://twitter.com/GenscapeWx/statu...06700364812288
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2016, 04:29 PM
 
Location: East Central Phoenix
8,042 posts, read 12,265,438 times
Reputation: 9835
Quote:
Originally Posted by NativeOrange View Post
LA didn't record even a trace of rain from Dec. 9th 1997 until sometime in early/mid January 1998.

So even during that super El Niño episode similar things were happening.
There indeed was a noticeable lack of precipitation in southern CA & the SW from approximately Christmas, 1997 to the middle of January, 1998. In fact, most of January was pretty quiet in 1998 before February & March became quite stormy if I recall. Something similar happened during the strong El Niño of 1982-1983 when much of late December through mid January was dry.

You're forgetting one important factor, however. During the strong El Niño winters of 1982-1983 and 1997-1998, there were pretty significant storm systems hitting southern CA in December. In 1982, there was moderate to heavy rain & snow in central/southern CA (and AZ as well) as early as November. This season, November & December were mostly dry across the region. So there is a huge difference between this supposedly strong El Niño and the other two. This one is a huge disappointment so far.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoziee View Post
I agree that the news media has made much to do about nothing. This El Nino hype is a bad joke. It's half way through January and we are at below average rainfall for this time of the year. So Cal has only two reliable weather forcasts, cold and dry and warm and dry. Am tired of hearing them make a big deal about big systems of low pressure out in the Pacific that end up giving us at best enough drizzle to ruin a newly washed car but nothing more. Let's just call it how it is. We're not getting any rain folks.
No kidding. What's really hilarious is the string of storms that moved through earlier this month: they produced some much needed precipitation, but all the meteorologists and the media were hyping it up to be associated with El Niño. In fact, they had nothing to do with El Niño! Back to back storm systems lasting about a week or so are very normal for this time of year in the SW ... nothing out of the ordinary, and no major flooding or mudslides occurred. Since those systems in early January, it's been mostly dry, and only minimal chances of any rain/snow are in the forecast for the remainder of the month. So much for January being the month for when we'd start seeing the El Niño effects.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
I'd say so. Especially the mountains where snow pack turns into water necessary for farming in the Central Valley and such.... I mean come on. SoCal is basically one big desert.
Oh, come on. Saying that southern CA is one big desert is about as ridiculous as saying that all of Arizona is one big desert. Yes, there are vast deserts in much of southern CA & AZ, but the region is made up of many different geographic, topographic, and climatic zones. In fact, the heavily populated areas of southern CA (L.A., San Diego, etc.) have what's described as a Mediterranean climate, not a desert climate. Sufficient rain & snow are essential for ALL of California, all of the SW, and all of the intermountain west during the winter months. The drought is basically affecting all of these areas ... it's not just the Central Valley that is in need dire of water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2016, 04:53 AM
 
29,529 posts, read 19,620,154 times
Reputation: 4543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valley Native View Post
Oh, come on. Saying that southern CA is one big desert is about as ridiculous as saying that all of Arizona is one big desert. Yes, there are vast deserts in much of southern CA & AZ, but the region is made up of many different geographic, topographic, and climatic zones. In fact, the heavily populated areas of southern CA (L.A., San Diego, etc.) have what's described as a Mediterranean climate, not a desert climate. Sufficient rain & snow are essential for ALL of California, all of the SW, and all of the intermountain west during the winter months. The drought is basically affecting all of these areas ... it's not just the Central Valley that is in need dire of water.

I know the LA region itself isn't a desert. But most of SoCal is. My point is that SoCal gets very little rain to begin with so, yes, most of the rain, even in an El Nino year will be further up the coast of California.

Just look how much of SoCal gets 5 inches or less of rain annually.



Precipitation Maps | Western Regional Climate Center

I just looked up rain fall totals by year and found that during the 97-98' El Nino LA received 31 inches of rain. That's more than double the average (still less than what we normally get).

Total Seasonal Rainfall 1877-Present
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top