Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Job Search
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-25-2012, 08:49 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,023,210 times
Reputation: 36027

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
Yes, Chatteresss, they have a choice, as the articles subject proved. He walked out.
What about the candidate who hasn't received any interviews and has been unemployed for over 6 months ... That person has the choice of giving out his/her Facebook password or potentially miss out on a job opportunity and continue going hungry. Some choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-25-2012, 08:53 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,972,963 times
Reputation: 7315
Its not the fault of the employer the candidate does not elicit a more favorable response. Its the employers job to seek only the very best candidate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2012, 08:58 PM
 
Location: here
24,873 posts, read 36,176,449 times
Reputation: 32726
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
Ethics and morals vary from person to person. I was really just trying to make the point that it is not illegal nor should it be. A business should be able to conduct freely. If people don't like it, they will choose not to work there. Which is fair.
It is not "fair" to the best candidate who refused to give up their password and didn't get hired.

Yes, ethics and morals vary, but it has been common knowledge since computers were invented that you don't give out your password to anyone. I'm not saying there should be a law against asking for it. I'm saying there shouldn't need to be a law. Some things should go without saying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2012, 09:01 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,972,963 times
Reputation: 7315
One will never know if the best candidate refused the request. No one ranks candidates not in the running at any point, for any reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2012, 09:02 PM
 
Location: here
24,873 posts, read 36,176,449 times
Reputation: 32726
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
One will never know if the best candidate refused the request. No one ranks candidates not in the running at any point, for any reason.
It doesn't matter if no one knows. It is still wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2012, 09:06 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,972,963 times
Reputation: 7315
The point is was he/she the best? Its speculative at best. Ask all the candidates interviewed, and they all say "I was the best". All but ONE are wrong, of course.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2012, 09:15 PM
 
1,378 posts, read 1,392,427 times
Reputation: 1141
I can guarantee you that there is a lot of info out there that could put many executives and bankers in prison.

The difference is, they have the power of money and the best legal teams on their side. The rest of us don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2012, 09:18 PM
 
Location: 112 Ocean Avenue
5,706 posts, read 9,632,328 times
Reputation: 8932
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
Its the employers job to seek only the very best candidate.
If an employer can't figure out what candidate is best based on a resume, background check, and interview, then that employer is brain dead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2012, 09:21 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,972,963 times
Reputation: 7315
The more info the better, RedJacket. Now I'm not talking about the McJob, for that an application and very basic background check should suffice, but for good jobs, too much info is not a problem. Too little is. And if someone acts in a manner not conducive to represent the company in a key role, they should not be hired.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2012, 09:41 PM
 
Location: 112 Ocean Avenue
5,706 posts, read 9,632,328 times
Reputation: 8932
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
The more info the better, RedJacket.
An employer is prohibited from asking a potential employee if they are married, what their sexual orientation is, their age, or their race, but that info could be found on their Facebook page.

The only thing an employer should give a chit about is your professional life, not your social/personal life. The latter is none of their damn business.

I suspect lawmakers will act rather quickly to stop this snooping by weird employers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Job Search

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top