U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
 
 
Old 04-11-2012, 06:26 AM
 
Location: property tax hell
1,837 posts, read 3,570,739 times
Reputation: 1353
Quote:
Originally Posted by tablemtn View Post
I would argue: no. If an employer fails to offer health coverage or benefits, that means the cost of any on-the-job injuries you accrue are dumped on your lap. And that could get extremely expensive, very quickly (in the US, anyway). You could actually get yourself stuck in a debt-trap by doing such a thing, and your job would end up being a liability.

I've noticed some employers whining about "lazy employees," but then it comes out that the job doesn't even include health coverage - so, really, why should employees strain themselves when the cost of that strain is going to fall entirely upon their shoulders? I get the sense that more and more employees are behaving in accord with this principle.
That's pretty lame. In essence, you're justifying your effort (or lack thereof) on something you think you are entitled to.. but was never part of the contract/offer?

So...is it okay for a contractor to do shoddy work on your house because you didn't provide them with food and drinks?
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-11-2012, 06:49 AM
 
15,710 posts, read 6,175,151 times
Reputation: 5709
annerk"You are either lazy, stupid, or mentally unstable. "

Not necessarily or, could be and. LOL!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 07:55 AM
 
841 posts, read 741,909 times
Reputation: 1101
Yeah, those people are dumb as....a fox.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 08:34 AM
 
22,148 posts, read 28,917,196 times
Reputation: 9919
Quote:
Originally Posted by chef.sunny22 View Post
Yeah, those people are dumb as....a fox.
A/K/A they are lazy.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 09:15 AM
 
392 posts, read 338,910 times
Reputation: 509
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
annerk"You are either lazy, stupid, or mentally unstable. "

Not necessarily or, could be and. LOL!
Gotta love the sociopath circle jerks
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 09:18 AM
 
15,619 posts, read 9,332,309 times
Reputation: 8577
Quote:
Originally Posted by tablemtn View Post
I would argue: no. If an employer fails to offer health coverage or benefits, that means the cost of any on-the-job injuries you accrue are dumped on your lap.
You still get Worker's Compensation do you not? I say it depends on how badly you need the job. It's an employer's market and they hold the cards.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Woodinville
2,172 posts, read 1,462,798 times
Reputation: 4078
Here's my take on jobs in general. No matter how hard the job is, how terrible the compensation, how lacking the benefits, work HARD. When you accepted the job, you pledged to work hard for your employer. Do it. If the job is not to your liking, start looking for something else. However, work hard from the first day to the last. Your effort shouldn't be dependent on your compensation. If you decide to find something new, leave on good terms. You were informed of compensation and benefits before taking the job and you still agreed to work, so work hard. If you're unhappy it's unethical to purposely penalize the employer because you agreed to the terms of employment.

In my view, the only way you should penalize the employer is with your own departure to something better.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 09:48 AM
 
15,710 posts, read 6,175,151 times
Reputation: 5709
Could not agree more, Garfunkle524. Those who whine or slow down, by the way, are also indicating to the employer no one wants THEM who would offer more. Now isn't that a lovely image to present of yourself.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 11:55 AM
 
Location: Austin
2,173 posts, read 1,250,812 times
Reputation: 2081
Quote:
Originally Posted by tablemtn View Post
I would argue: no. If an employer fails to offer health coverage or benefits, that means the cost of any on-the-job injuries you accrue are dumped on your lap. And that could get extremely expensive, very quickly (in the US, anyway). You could actually get yourself stuck in a debt-trap by doing such a thing, and your job would end up being a liability.

I've noticed some employers whining about "lazy employees," but then it comes out that the job doesn't even include health coverage - so, really, why should employees strain themselves when the cost of that strain is going to fall entirely upon their shoulders? I get the sense that more and more employees are behaving in accord with this principle.
Employers have the RIGHT to offer it or not. YOU have the right to work for them or someone else. So, it really comes down to your personal work ethic. I wouldn't do ANY job unless I do it 100%. But then, I do care about more than "what's in it for me!"
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Austin
2,173 posts, read 1,250,812 times
Reputation: 2081
Quote:
Originally Posted by annerk View Post
If you don't like your job, your employer, your coworker, or your benefits, find another job. Purposely injuring yourself on the job--or even threatening to--shows your true colors. You are either lazy, stupid, or mentally unstable. I'll allow you to choose which best describes yourself.
Entitlists.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $79,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top