Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-04-2015, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Fortaleza, Northeast of Brazil
3,992 posts, read 6,795,905 times
Reputation: 2470

Advertisements

Are all countries of Europe considered to be "First World" countries?

Would you classify Bulgaria, Romania and Ukraine as "First World" countries?

And what about Serbia, Macedonia, Bosnia, Albania and Moldova?

How do you classify those countries?

 
Old 08-04-2015, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Somewhere in Southern Italy
2,974 posts, read 2,816,051 times
Reputation: 1495
No, they are all considered to be developing countries, the closest countries out of those to reaching first world status is probably Romania but even they are a bit far off and will have to wait a decade or two before catching up to the rest of Europe.
 
Old 08-04-2015, 04:32 PM
 
209 posts, read 304,459 times
Reputation: 87
No, are you in drugs?
 
Old 08-04-2015, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Trieste
957 posts, read 1,133,630 times
Reputation: 793
2nd world countries
most people there literally hardly get 3 rich meals a day and infrastructures are of poor quality
 
Old 08-04-2015, 08:19 PM
 
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
10,646 posts, read 16,035,527 times
Reputation: 5286
2nd World:
Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia

3rd World-ish:
Ukraine, Bosnia, Albania, Macedonia

3rd World:
Moldova
 
Old 08-05-2015, 01:41 AM
 
Location: Minsk, Belarus
667 posts, read 940,673 times
Reputation: 585
I think they are all like 2nd world countries, but not 3rd. It's not Bangladesh or Yemen.
 
Old 08-05-2015, 06:04 AM
 
Location: Fortaleza, Northeast of Brazil
3,992 posts, read 6,795,905 times
Reputation: 2470
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marmel View Post
I think they are all like 2nd world countries, but not 3rd. It's not Bangladesh or Yemen.
From what I can remember from my History and Geography classes, that category "Second World" was reserved for communist countries with a central planned economy, in the Cold War era.

I don't think a "Second World" still exists today...
 
Old 08-05-2015, 06:10 AM
 
Location: Minsk, Belarus
667 posts, read 940,673 times
Reputation: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalaMan View Post
From what I can remember from my History and Geography classes, that category "Second World" was reserved for communist countries with a central planned economy, in the Cold War era.

I don't think a "Second World" still exists today...
Well yeah you are right, this definition of "worlds" is basically outdated.

But the phrase "third world" have become common anyway -- in English and in other languages (for example we often use it in Russian).
"First world" is also still used. So, based on that we can assume that the "second world" should be something in between, i.e. countries that are not too rich and not too poor.
And by the way so it happened that many ex-communist countries meet these criteria.
 
Old 08-05-2015, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
10,646 posts, read 16,035,527 times
Reputation: 5286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marmel View Post
I think they are all like 2nd world countries, but not 3rd. It's not Bangladesh or Yemen.
Bangladesh and Yemen are 4th World.
 
Old 08-05-2015, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Canada
4,865 posts, read 10,528,229 times
Reputation: 5504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davy-040 View Post
Bangladesh and Yemen are 4th World.
4th world has been used occasionally to refer to uncontacted or very isolated groups of self sufficient human hunter gatherers who haven't entered into the modern systems of the nations in which they reside. The worlds thing is just kind of bothersome to me because of the hierarchy it implies, I think economically developed, middle income, and developing are better as broad terms.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top