Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Writing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2012, 02:02 PM
 
Location: Florida
7,195 posts, read 5,728,534 times
Reputation: 12342

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpg35223 View Post
Yeah, but that's kind of clunky at best. I personally hate semi-colons. I think I actually hit that key once a year.
Them's fightin' words; you's dissin' my favorite punctuation mark!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2012, 02:43 PM
 
Location: The Triad
34,090 posts, read 82,988,469 times
Reputation: 43666
Quote:
Originally Posted by atina33 View Post
Disneyland is not the "happiest place on earth", that distinction goes to Plymouth!
OR
Disneyland is not the "happiest place on earth," that distinction goes to Plymouth!

Another vote for neither.
Disneyland is not the "happiest place on earth" as that distinction goes to Plymouth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2012, 04:27 PM
 
Location: SC
9,101 posts, read 16,459,190 times
Reputation: 3620
Quote:
Originally Posted by atina33 View Post
Disneyland is not the "happiest place on earth", that distinction goes to Plymouth!
OR
Disneyland is not the "happiest place on earth," that distinction goes to Plymouth!


Thanks.
The first one is what I would choose because by itself you'd never see "happiest place on earth,". But you would see "happiest place on earth".

Even better would be: Disneyland is not the "happiest place on earth". That distinction goes to Plymouth.
Since both sentences have a subject and a verb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2012, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,586 posts, read 84,818,250 times
Reputation: 115121
While I am not a big fan of Disney, I have no idea why anyone would consider Plymouth the happiest place on earth, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2017, 01:54 PM
 
2 posts, read 879 times
Reputation: 10
Default Punctuation with quotation marks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skwim View Post
If it's a period or comma it goes inside quotation marks. If it's a colon or semicolon it goes outside. If it's a question mark or exclamation it goes inside when it applies only to the quoted material. when either apply to the entire sentence it goes outside.
When you write something that includes quotation marks, either the punctuation goes inside or it belongs outside. The 'rule' is actually just common sense. IF the punctuation relates to what is inside the marks, then it goes inside. Otherwise, it goes outside. Should I quote something like "A preposition is a bad word to end a sentence with." then the end of the quote is the end of a sentence, and the period accompanies it. However, when the quotation is not the end of a sentence, "Now three things abide, Faith Hope and Love..." , then the punctuation should grace the sentence, not the quote. I realize that this is controversial, and more important than the mundane questions of "Who does the President think he is?" or "Nobody believes Global Warming to be real", Still, it's not the end of the world if you change the written form of English, and everyone adopts your style, thus changing the language irreparably, which leads to the collapse of World Civilization.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2017, 04:11 PM
 
11,113 posts, read 19,547,135 times
Reputation: 10175
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpg35223 View Post
Actually, neither. It's a run-on as written.

Better to write it this way:

Disneyland is not the "happiest place on earth." That distinction goes to Plymouth!

^^^ this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2017, 07:29 PM
 
4,713 posts, read 3,473,484 times
Reputation: 6304
Wouldn't the comma placement depend on whether the 'complete quote' as spoken/written had a comma there? I agree with the poster that the text needs to be set as two separate statements.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2017, 07:41 AM
bg7
 
7,694 posts, read 10,563,106 times
Reputation: 15300
The US is slowly moving to more logical quotation mark practice (as used in the UK and other countries) where the punctuation only goes inside the quotation marks if it is actually... part of the quote. Its much more logical, and simply looks better and more symmetric. Not surprisingly, its known as "logical punctuation". Its getting more common in legal circles especially since whether that comma was part of the quote or not can be the be all and end all of the legal case!


In any event, writing so as to avoid the comma is preferable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2017, 10:29 PM
 
23,601 posts, read 70,425,146 times
Reputation: 49277
Recognizing that this is an ancient thread, rules are initially designed to help and as guidelines. Within a few moments of a rule being created, pucker-butts will attempt to turn any new rules into addendums to the commandments, and claim that they are engraved in stone.

Tom, the website you want is "cnn.com", which is a news site.
Tom, the website you want is "cnn.com," which is a news site.

When Tom types in the quoted phrase, which was the intended phrase?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2017, 03:42 AM
 
Location: Cushing OK
14,539 posts, read 21,263,135 times
Reputation: 16939
Quote:
Originally Posted by bg7 View Post
The US is slowly moving to more logical quotation mark practice (as used in the UK and other countries) where the punctuation only goes inside the quotation marks if it is actually... part of the quote. Its much more logical, and simply looks better and more symmetric. Not surprisingly, its known as "logical punctuation". Its getting more common in legal circles especially since whether that comma was part of the quote or not can be the be all and end all of the legal case!


In any event, writing so as to avoid the comma is preferable.
This is how I was taught, and always have done. Of course the school I went to until grade 3 was private, and most of the teachers were English, so maybe they taught it the way they knew. It just makes sense that only the words within the quote marks are spoken. You shouldn't have to stop and figure out what was actually said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Writing

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top