Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Cambridge Elementary School in San Antonio, TX
(01-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 57
Address
 1001 TOWNSEND AVE
San Antonio, TX 78209
Telephone
(210) 822-3611
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.ahisd.net
City-data.com school rating
57
Students
796
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
62.4
Free lunch eligible students
172
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
23
School district
ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I targeted assistance school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
ALAMO HEIGHTS H S (0.8 miles):

84
ALAMO HEIGHTS J H (1.5 miles):

83
WOODRIDGE EL (1.8 miles):

60
Cambridge Elementary School:

57
SAN ANTONIO SCHOOL FOR INQUIRY & CREATIVITY (2.0 miles):

40
KIPP PODER ACADEMY (1.8 miles):

37
SOUTHWEST PREPARATORY SCHOOL (1.5 miles):

34
LAMAR EL (1.4 miles):

33
NEW DIRECTIONS (1.6 miles):

32
Cambridge Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Bexar County:

48
San Antonio:

48
Cambridge Elementary School:

57

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 796
Enrollment in 2015: 805
Enrollment in 2014: 805
Enrollment in 2013: 820
Enrollment in 2012: 852
Enrollment in 2011: 840
Enrollment in 2010: 860
Enrollment in 2009: 850
Enrollment in 2008: 809
Enrollment in 2007: 794
Enrollment in 2006: 754
Enrollment in 2005: 717
Enrollment in 2004: 730
Enrollment in 2003: 754
Enrollment in 2002: 840
Enrollment in 2001: 815
Enrollment in 2000: 933
Enrollment in 1999: 929

Cambridge Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students159155183138161796
Female students8683857063387
Male students7372986898409
American Indian/Alaska Native students2 - - 114
Asian students94113330
Hispanic students6765716560328
Black students3 - 46215
White students7785976394416
Two or More Races students11 - - 13

Enrollment by grade:
1st grade enrollment: 159
2nd grade enrollment: 155
3rd grade enrollment: 183
4th grade enrollment: 138
5th grade enrollment: 161

Cambridge Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 387 (48.6%)
Here:

48.6%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 409 (51.4%)
Here:

51.4%
Texas:

50.1%

Cambridge Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 4 (0.5%)
Here:

0.5%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 30 (3.8%)
Cambridge Elementary School:

3.8%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 328 (41.2%)
School:

41.2%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 15 (1.9%)
Here:

1.9%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 416 (52.3%)
School:

52.3%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 3 (0.4%)
School:

0.4%
Texas:

2.1%

Cambridge Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 195 (24.5%)
School:

24.5%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 172 (21.6%)
School:

21.6%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 23 (2.9%)
School:

2.9%
State:

6.2%

Cambridge Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 62.4

Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 15

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

12.8
Texas:

15.6

Cambridge Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $3,856,707
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 55.7 (Salary Expenditures: $3,162,344)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $102,783)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $275,811)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5.6 (Salary Expenditures: $315,769)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $71,952
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $760,513
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $465,544
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 6 (Salary Expenditures: $294,968)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $6,688

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 20 (male: 10, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 37 (male: 26, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 23 (male: 19, female: 4)
  • White: 14 (male: 7, female: 7)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic28
  • Black2
  • White52
  • LEP2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 82 (male: 54, female: 28)
  • Hispanic: 28 (male: 17, female: 11)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 52 (male: 35, female: 17)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic31
  • Asian7
  • Black2
  • White118
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 158 (male: 80, female: 78)
  • Hispanic: 31 (male: 20, female: 11)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 118 (male: 56, female: 62)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

198.5
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,464
  • Males1,475
  • Females1,452
  • Hispanic1,415
  • Black1,347
  • White1,504
Math Average Scale Score:

1,464
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 154
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 154

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

21%
35%
26%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,475, Tested: 81, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 21%)
22%
34%
23%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,452, Tested: 73, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 14%)
21%
37%
28%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,415, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 9%)
33%
37%
21%
9%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,347, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,504, Tested: 81, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 25%)
11%
33%
31%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,476
  • Males1,462
  • Females1,491
  • Hispanic1,444
  • Black1,337
  • White1,510
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,476
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 154
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 154

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

15%
29%
29%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,462, Tested: 81, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 25%)
16%
32%
27%
25%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,491, Tested: 73, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 29%)
14%
26%
31%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,444, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 14%)
20%
33%
33%
14%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,337, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
40%
40%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,510, Tested: 81, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 40%)
10%
25%
25%
40%
3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math Average Scale Score:

1,422
State:

510
Math students tested: 5
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 5

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.4 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 1.8 (45%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

40%
20%
20%
20%
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,365
State:

956
Reading students tested: 5
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 5

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.2 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.4 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (51%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 60%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

20%
60%
20%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,559
  • Males1,554
  • Females1,563
  • Hispanic1,466
  • Asian1,586
  • White1,620
Math Average Scale Score:

1,559
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 153
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 153

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

24%
32%
18%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,554, Tested: 72, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 28%)
31%
25%
16%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,563, Tested: 81, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 25%)
19%
37%
19%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,466, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 5%)
46%
36%
13%
5%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 40%)
20%
20%
20%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,620, Tested: 89, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 39%)
9%
29%
23%
39%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,554
  • Males1,519
  • Females1,586
  • Hispanic1,477
  • Asian1,551
  • White1,607
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,554
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 153
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 153

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 36%

22%
22%
20%
36%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,519, Tested: 72, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 28%)
32%
24%
16%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 81, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 43%)
14%
19%
24%
43%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 16%)
39%
24%
21%
16%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,551, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 89, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 51%)
12%
18%
19%
51%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,812
  • Males3,697
  • Females3,913
  • Hispanic3,449
  • Asian3,730
  • White4,054
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,812
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 151
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 151

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.6 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

34%
22%
29%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,697, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 8%)
38%
23%
31%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,913, Tested: 80, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 20%)
30%
21%
29%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,449, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 61%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 2%)
61%
19%
18%
2%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 3,730, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
40%
40%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,054, Tested: 88, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 24%)
16%
21%
39%
24%
4th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

Writing students tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,659
  • Males1,672
  • Females1,645
  • Hispanic1,615
  • Asian1,784
  • White1,681
Math Average Scale Score:

1,659
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 178
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 178

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 35%

10%
20%
35%
35%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,672, Tested: 88, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 39%)
7%
23%
31%
39%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,645, Tested: 90, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 32%)
12%
19%
37%
32%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 74, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 23%)
15%
31%
31%
23%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,784, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 88%)
12%
88%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,681, Tested: 94, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 40%)
6%
13%
41%
40%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,643
  • Males1,654
  • Females1,633
  • Hispanic1,590
  • Asian1,794
  • White1,666
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,643
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 173
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 173

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.8 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.5 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 14%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 36%

12%
14%
38%
36%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,654, Tested: 85, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 41%)
9%
13%
37%
41%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,633, Tested: 88, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 31%)
14%
16%
39%
31%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,590, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 20%)
16%
20%
44%
20%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,794, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 75%)
12%
13%
75%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,666, Tested: 94, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 44%)
10%
10%
36%
44%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,799
  • Males3,856
  • Females3,745
  • Hispanic3,666
  • Asian4,111
  • White3,863
Science Average Scale Score:

3,799
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 171
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 171

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.2 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 45%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

20%
45%
27%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,856, Tested: 84, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 10%)
14%
47%
29%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,745, Tested: 87, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 7%)
26%
43%
24%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,666, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 3%)
33%
45%
19%
3%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,111, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 50%)
13%
25%
13%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,863, Tested: 92, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 8%)
12%
46%
34%
8%
5th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

Reading Average Scale Score:

1,571
State:

683
Reading students tested: 6
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 6

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.7 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 0%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

33%
34%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,571, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 33%)
33%
34%
33%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,768
  • Males3,781
  • Hispanic3,576
Science Average Scale Score:

3,768
State:

857
Science students tested: 8
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 8

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.1 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.9 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.6 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

25%
37%
25%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,781, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
20%
40%
40%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,576, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
33%
50%
17%

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss San Antonio, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. San Antonio main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Cambridge Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents