City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 80.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Mast Academy School (13.6 miles): | 94 |
| Doral Performing Arts & Entertainment Academy School: | 80 |
| Somerset Arts Conservatory School (15.4 miles): | 71 |
| Mater Academy Charter High School (1.4 miles): | 51 |
| Sunset Heights Charter (Inactive 10/02) School (6.6 miles): | 33 |
| North Miami Beach Senior High School (15.9 miles): | 18 |
| Richmond Perrine Optimist School (13.7 miles): | 6 |
| Life Skills Center Opa Locka School (10.1 miles): | 1 |
Doral Performing Arts & Entertainment Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Miami-Dade County: | 45 |
| Doral: | 72 |
| This School: | 80 |
1
Alejandra
Dec 10, 2014 @ 6:18 pm
How can i enter in this school for theatre? i have to do an audition or something like that? or is just by election?
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 13
School number: 7009
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 591-9251
Principal: Douglas Rodriguez
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 112
Senate District: 40
School Web Address: http://dachs.dadeschools.net
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 620 |
| State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2006: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 568 |
| State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 100% |
| State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2006: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 28% |
| State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 71% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 605 |
| State average from 425 schools: | 526 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 100% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 42% |
Minority Rate
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 95% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19 (79%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 360 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 413 |
| State average from 361 schools: | 374 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 99% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2006: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 47% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2156 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 355 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 85% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2130 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 76% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 10% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 17 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 5% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2104 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 355 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 35% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 98% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2069 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 100% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 90% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2061 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1966 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 67%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2061 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2047 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 87%| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 27%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2052 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2132 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 69%| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2042 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2040 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 94%| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 337 |
| State average: | 323 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 717 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 81 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 7 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 726 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 81 |
| State average: | 65 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 16
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 6%| Here: | 328 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 69%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 63%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 2029 |
| State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 2022 |
| State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 126| Here: | 1895 |
| State average: | 1779 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 2010 |
| State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 64%| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 291 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 13
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 2010 |
| State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 42| DORAL PERFORMING ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT ACADEMY: | 1968 |
| State average: | 1876 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 57%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 9
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1989 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1992 |
| State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 69| Here: | 1922 |
| State average: | 1821 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 19
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 84| Here: | 722 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 16
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 69| Here: | 712 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 19
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 84| Here: | 729 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 10
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 59| Here: | 707 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%| Here: | 318 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 77%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 100%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.