Drop Back In School in Ft Lauderdale, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 22.

2800 W OAKLAND PARK BLVD
Ft Lauderdale, FL 33311

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
The Quest Center School (9.0 miles):

87
Doctors Charter Of Miami Shores School (19.9 miles):

79
Miami Lakes Educational Center School (18.6 miles):

60
Olympic Heights Community High School (14.6 miles):

45
Thompson Academy School (12.3 miles):

33
Drop Back In School:

22
Hallandale High School (12.0 miles):

14
North University High School (4.7 miles):

2
Robert Renick Education Center School (14.4 miles):

0
Drop Back In School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Ft Lauderdale:

22
Drop Back In School:

22

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (954) 583-8409 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 6501
School type: Senior High
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (954) 583-8389
Principal: Peggy Morrison-Thurston
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
DROP BACK IN:

67%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

42%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
DROP BACK IN:

66%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

531
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 840 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 840 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 288
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 802
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 785

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 801
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 783
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 707 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 707 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 246
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 677
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 667

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 676
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 664
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 682 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 682 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 226
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 646
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 635

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 645
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 634
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

40%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
DROP BACK IN:

72%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

526
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 913 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 910 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 312
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 862
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 849

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 859
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 844
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 752 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 750 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 244
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
DROP BACK IN:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 705
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 699

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 703
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 695
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 678 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 675 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 213
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 635
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 628

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 633
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 626
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 131 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

536
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

68%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1060 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1061 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 403
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1028
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 986

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1028
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 984
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 852 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 853 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 305
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
DROP BACK IN:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 823
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 795

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 823
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 794
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 723 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 724 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 250
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 701
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 670

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 702
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 670
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
DROP BACK IN:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

2%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

8%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
DROP BACK IN:

37%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

5%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

22%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

7%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

17%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

185
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

28%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: NO

Grade in 2007: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (36%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (33%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20 (45%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18 (39%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (35%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (32%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19 (40%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18 (37%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (43%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (44%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14 (36%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11 (31%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (36%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (32%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16 (46%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14 (37%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (35%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (31%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9 (28%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (38%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (33%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23 (42%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21 (39%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1384
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

53%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
DROP BACK IN:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1645
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
DROP BACK IN:

38%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1830
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

44%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

93%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

12
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DROP BACK IN:

1686
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
DROP BACK IN:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1807
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
DROP BACK IN:

16%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1895
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
DROP BACK IN:

5%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
DROP BACK IN:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1559
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
DROP BACK IN:

76%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

7
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1549
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DROP BACK IN:

230
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

12%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

85%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

2%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

3%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

366
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
DROP BACK IN:

15%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
DROP BACK IN:

25%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

11
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
DROP BACK IN:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
DROP BACK IN:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

71%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
DROP BACK IN:

1%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
DROP BACK IN:

8%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
DROP BACK IN:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1511
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
DROP BACK IN:

18%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

41%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
DROP BACK IN:

77%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
DROP BACK IN:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DROP BACK IN:

1570
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
DROP BACK IN:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DROP BACK IN:

1804
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

362
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
DROP BACK IN:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1675
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
DROP BACK IN:

50%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1909
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DROP BACK IN:

324
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
DROP BACK IN:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1723
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

60%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

3%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

3%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1786
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

39%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

48%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

21%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1458
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DROP BACK IN:

326
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1719
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1777
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1687
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1762
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DROP BACK IN:

1881
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1585
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1621
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1468
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1669
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1726
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1664
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DROP BACK IN:

1799
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1903
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1706
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1815
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 56
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 98%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 322
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 115
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
DROP BACK IN:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 38%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1462
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1694
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1766
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1628
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1744
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1833
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1612
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1604
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DROP BACK IN:

1513
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DROP BACK IN:

346
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1610
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1631
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1825
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1894
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1698
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DROP BACK IN:

235
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1817
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

52
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

645
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
DROP BACK IN:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
DROP BACK IN:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

52
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

668
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
DROP BACK IN:

81
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

44
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

84
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
DROP BACK IN:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

290
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

661
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
DROP BACK IN:

54
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
DROP BACK IN:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
DROP BACK IN:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
DROP BACK IN:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

357
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

62
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
DROP BACK IN:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
DROP BACK IN:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

416
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

679
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

57
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
DROP BACK IN:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

26
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

648
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

20
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
DROP BACK IN:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

41
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

30
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 51
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

345
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 82%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 411
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
DROP BACK IN:

276
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 140
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

227
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 44%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1590
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 14%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1562
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1629
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -67

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1529
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

226
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 31%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1562
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1743
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -181

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1711
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

239
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 16%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1608
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1669
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -61

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1802
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 31%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1853
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1869
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -16

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 27
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 28
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 29
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 35
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 27
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 34
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 29
Mean Scale Score
Here:

694
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 41
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 69
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
DROP BACK IN:

215
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 10%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 42%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 22%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Ft Lauderdale, FL
  5. Drop Back In School in Ft Lauderdale, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.