Harrison For The Arts School in Lakeland, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 78.

750 HOLLINGSWORTH RD
Lakeland, FL 33801

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
International Baccalaureate School (12.1 miles):

100
Harrison For The Arts School:

78
Maynard A. Traviss Career Center School (3.9 miles):

55
Ridge Career Center School (18.0 miles):

44
Mulberry Senior High School (9.6 miles):

38
Gause Academy Of Leadership School (10.6 miles):

34
Lake Region High School (12.3 miles):

24
Foundation School (2.2 miles):

2
Harrison For The Arts School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Polk County:

41
Lakeland:

44
Harrison For The Arts School:

78

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (863) 499-2855 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 33
School type: Senior High
District Name: POLK
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 499-2938
Principal: Craig Collins
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 64
Senate District: 15

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

32%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

44%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

71%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

20%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

41%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

360
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: F

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

4%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 2

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

28%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

34%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

60%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

7%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

71%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

389
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: F

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

46%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 2


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 149

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

94%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

62%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

84%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

92%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

600
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

14%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

22%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 210 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 210 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 108
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 162 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

63%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

482
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 227 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 116
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 226
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 226
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 94

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 183
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 183
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

94%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

79%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

51%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

455
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1296
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

1433
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

42%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

1733
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

48%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1792
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

46%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

17%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1749
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

42%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

5%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

19%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1783
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

31%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

61%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

3%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

44%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

44%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

3%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

12%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

44%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1278
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1313
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

42%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

25%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1709
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

43%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1726
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

31%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1795
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

43%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

32%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1861
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

58%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

39%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1707
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1623
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1837
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1731
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

222
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1647
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1707
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1833
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1854
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 33
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 58
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 40%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1584
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

274
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1590
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1767
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1676
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

223
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1626
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1718
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1815
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1874
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

4
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

9
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

23
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

630
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

15
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

63
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

40
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

55
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

39
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 19
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

203
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 42%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 68
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

244
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 12%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2143
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2136
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2045
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 90

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2187
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 14
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2187
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2180
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 9

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2055
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

2057
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1993
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 64

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2108
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 97%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:

2108
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2071
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 37

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 104
Mean Scale Score
Here:

743
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 92
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 17
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 18
Critical Analysis (max 14): 12
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 107
Mean Scale Score
Here:

730
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 84
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 14): 12
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 104
Mean Scale Score
Here:

742
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 90
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 11
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 11

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 107
Mean Scale Score
Here:

741
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 10
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 108
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

341
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 81%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 15
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 92%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Lakeland, FL
  5. Harrison For The Arts School in Lakeland, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.