
Back to: Lakeland, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 78.
750 HOLLINGSWORTH RD
Lakeland, FL 33801
Other nearby schools ratings:
Harrison For The Arts School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Polk County:  41  Lakeland:  44  Harrison For The Arts School:  78 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Lakeland, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (863) 4992855 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 33
School type: Senior High
District Name: POLK
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 4992938
Principal: Craig Collins
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 64
Senate District: 15
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  32%  State average from 451 schools:  62% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  44%  State average from 451 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  71%  State average from 452 schools:  86% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  20%  State average from 451 schools:  48% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  41%  State average from 452 schools:  58% 
Making Math GainsHere:  58%  State average from 449 schools:  72% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  41%  State average from 452 schools:  52% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  53%  State average from 452 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  360  State average from 452 schools:  522 
Percent TestedHere:  98%  State average from 450 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: F
Grade in 2007: P
Grade in 2006: P
Grade in 2005: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  49%  State average from 454 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  4%  State average from 454 schools:  47% 
Region: 2
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  23%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 123
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  35%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 127
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  24%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 88
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  22%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  22%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 34
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  26%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 71
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  9%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  20%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  28%  State average from 443 schools:  60% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  34%  State average from 440 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  60%  State average from 443 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  7%  State average from 443 schools:  46% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  54%  State average from 441 schools:  59% 
Making Math GainsHere:  69%  State average from 442 schools:  72% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  66%  State average from 442 schools:  56% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  71%  State average from 441 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  389  State average from 441 schools:  522 
Percent TestedHere:  97%  State average from 448 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: F
Grade in 2007: P
Grade in 2006: P
Grade in 2005: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  46%  State average from 446 schools:  46% 
Minority RateHere:  29%  State average from 451 schools:  45% 
Region: 2
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  24%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 149
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 150
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  26%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 95
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 95
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  13%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  13%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 46
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  27%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  24%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 75
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  17%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  21%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 58
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  16%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 87
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 88
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  73%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  18%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 69
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 15
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  15%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 42
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  8%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  35%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 45
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  75%  State average from 370 schools:  45% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  94%  State average from 370 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  92%  State average from 370 schools:  84% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  62%  State average from 370 schools:  41% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  60%  State average from 370 schools:  52% 
Making Math GainsHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  84%  State average from 370 schools:  71% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  41%  State average from 370 schools:  49% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  92%  State average from 370 schools:  67% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  600  State average from 370 schools:  482 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 370 schools:  97% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  14%  State average from 372 schools:  38% 
Minority RateHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  22%  State average from 372 schools:  48% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 210 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 210 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  97%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 108
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 162 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  97%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  79%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  79%  State average from 360 schools:  45% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  93%  State average from 361 schools:  68% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  94%  State average from 361 schools:  83% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  73%  State average from 361 schools:  53% 
Making Math GainsHere:  80%  State average from 361 schools:  72% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  63%  State average from 361 schools:  53% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  482  State average from 361 schools:  374 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 361 schools:  98% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  13%  State average from 362 schools:  38% 
Minority RateHere:  19%  State average from 362 schools:  47% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 227 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  99%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 116
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 226
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 226
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  99%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 94
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  79%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 183
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 183
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 21
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 13
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 28
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  73%  State average from 348 schools:  42% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  94%  State average from 348 schools:  67% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  97%  State average from 348 schools:  84% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  61%  State average from 348 schools:  51% 
Making Math GainsHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  79%  State average from 348 schools:  73% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  51%  State average from 348 schools:  53% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  455  State average from 348 schools:  371 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 348 schools:  98% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  13%  State average from 347 schools:  38% 
Minority RateHere:  19%  State average from 348 schools:  45% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1296  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  31%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  31%  State average:  32% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  69%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  1433  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  294  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  25%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  33%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  33%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  42%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  1733  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  19%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  19%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  48%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  14%  State average:  23% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  62%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1792  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  26%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  46%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  17%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  11%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  29%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1749  State average:  1922 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  280  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  42%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  40%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  14%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 4HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  5%  State average:  12% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  19%  State average:  45% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  5  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1783  State average:  1938 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  274  State average:  302 
Percent PassingHere:  31%  State average:  56% 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  61%  State average:  35% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  21%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  10%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  3%  State average:  12% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  18%  State average:  37% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  277  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  44%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  44%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3
% in each Achievement Level 5HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  3%  State average:  2% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  12%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  6  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  284  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  44%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  39%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  17%  State average:  30% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  17%  State average:  36% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1278  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  295  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  31%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  23%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  23%  State average:  31% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  46%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1313  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  267  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  33%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  42%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  36% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  25%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  4  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  2  State average:  4 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1709  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  286  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  43%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  24%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  33%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1726  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  278  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  37%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  31%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  31%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  4  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1795  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  264  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  43%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  25%  State average:  22% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  20%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  32%  State average:  61% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1861  State average:  1995 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  293  State average:  326 
Percent PassingHere:  58%  State average:  80% 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  27%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  34%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  24%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  11%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 5HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  3%  State average:  8% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  39%  State average:  69% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1707  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  298  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1623  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  255  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1837  State average:  1907 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  296  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1731  State average:  1921 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  264  State average:  299 
Percent Passing: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  222  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  265  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1647  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  271  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1707  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  273  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1833  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  275  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1854  State average:  1972 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  291  State average:  321 
Percent Passing: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 33
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 70%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 58
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  3  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 17%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 40%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1584  State average:  1775 
Mean Scale Score 100500HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  274  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1590  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  248  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1767  State average:  1894 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  283  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1676  State average:  1935 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  254  State average:  302 
Percent Passing: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  223  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  269  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1626  State average:  1801 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  266  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1718  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  276  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1815  State average:  1915 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  270  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1874  State average:  1984 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  296  State average:  323 
Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  4  State average:  190 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  630  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  63  State average:  273 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  672  State average from 2275 schools:  694 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  682  State average from 2096 schools:  709 
Functional (max 18)HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  12  State average:  14 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 19
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  203  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 21%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  CombinedHARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  3  State average:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 16%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 42%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 68
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  244  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 12%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 53%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  2143  State average from 612 schools:  1849 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  353  State average:  298 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  2136  State average:  1837 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  2045  State average:  1779 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 90
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  2187  State average from 573 schools:  1879 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  348  State average:  291 
Percent Passing: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 14
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  2187  State average:  1873 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  2180  State average:  1876 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 7
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  295 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 9
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  2055  State average from 613 schools:  1884 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  341  State average:  290 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  2057  State average:  1869 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1993  State average:  1821 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 64
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  2108  State average from 581 schools:  1950 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  353  State average:  315 
Percent Passing: 97%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007HARRISON SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS:  2108  State average:  1939 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  2071  State average:  1901 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 37
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 104
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  743  State average from 597 schools:  696 
Median NPR: 92
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 17
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 18
Critical Analysis (max 14): 12
Strategies (max 10): 9
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 107
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  730  State average from 575 schools:  695 
Median NPR: 84
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 14): 12
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 104
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  742  State average from 597 schools:  708 
Median NPR: 90
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 11
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 11
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 107
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  741  State average from 575 schools:  710 
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 10
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 108
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  341  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 81%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 9  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 15
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 92%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 81%
