City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 62.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Lively Technical Center School (7.4 miles): | 85 |
| Lincoln High School: | 62 |
| Mehrdad Pepper Ghazvini Learning Center School (7.9 miles): | 53 |
| Pace Secondary School (4.1 miles): | 48 |
| Florida State University School (3.7 miles): | 41 |
| Gretchen Everhart School (7.6 miles): | 39 |
| James Rickards High School (3.5 miles): | 25 |
| Florida A&m University Developmental Research School (4.4 miles): | 15 |
Lincoln High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Leon County: | 45 |
| Tallahassee: | 45 |
| Lincoln High School: | 62 |
1
Wes McIntyre
Jan 7, 2013 @ 11:11 am
I am trying to find the procedure for getting a copy of a student's high school diploma. How would a former student aquire such a copy or academic transcript?
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 37
School number: 1091
School type: Senior High
District Name: LEON
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 922-4173
Principal: Martha Bunch
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 4
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
Senate District: 3
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 487 |
| State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1202 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1196 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1052
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1043
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 614 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 612 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 182
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 538
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 535
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 285 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 282 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 248
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 163
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 775 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 773 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 671
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 666
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 175 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 149
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 92% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 510 |
| State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 99% |
| State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1060 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1056 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 344
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 910
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 905
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 628 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 625 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 213
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 536
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 533
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 201
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 611 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 607 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 189
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 520
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 514
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 69% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 71% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 536 |
| State average from 425 schools: | 526 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 42% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1031 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1032 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 357
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 867
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 868
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 639 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 640 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 240
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 530
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 530
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 192 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 192 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 167
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 104
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 540 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 540 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 159
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 459
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 459
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 90% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 41% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 52% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 49% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 549 |
| State average from 370 schools: | 482 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 97% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1035 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1033 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 617 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 614 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 329 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 330 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 154 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 360 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 53% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 393 |
| State average from 361 schools: | 374 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 99% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 47% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1067 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1069 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 626 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 631 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 357 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 353 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 174 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 42% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 84% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 51% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 50% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 405 |
| State average from 348 schools: | 371 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 347 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 45% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1495 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 41% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 81% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1681 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 85% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 20 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1771 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1680 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 60% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1785 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 61% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1822 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2022 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 11% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2060 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 69% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 349 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 63% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 289 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 31% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 5% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 2% |
| State average: | 1% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 1461 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 76% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1665 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 5% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 26% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 84% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1748 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 350 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 73% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1651 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 30% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 51% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1768 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 49% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1857 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 3% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1999 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 73% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2044 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 91% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 5% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 11% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1487 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 1757 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 05%| Here: | 350 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1747 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1674 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 1798 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1862 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2013 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2071 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 72%| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1533 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 350 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1687 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1739 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 1631 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 300 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1769 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1892 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1999 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2059 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 93%| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 121
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 376
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 503
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1490 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1676 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1699 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1671 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 304 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1786 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1901 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2054 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 336 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2088 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 71%| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 330 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1486 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1656 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 346 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1694 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1634 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1806 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 310 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1907 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2023 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2062 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 92%| Here: | 342 |
| State average: | 323 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 126 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 641 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 68 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 125 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 665 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 79 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 145 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 678 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 80 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 291 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 668 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 60 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 365 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 680 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 66 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 376 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 691 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 67 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 525 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 718 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 81 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 490 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 732 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 84 |
| State average: | 65 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 125
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%| Here: | 306 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 374
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%| Here: | 294 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 42%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 484
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%| Here: | 329 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 69%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 2045 |
| State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 335 |
| State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 2049 |
| State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 94| Here: | 1955 |
| State average: | 1779 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 2063 |
| State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 68%| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 291 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 13
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 2074 |
| State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 39| Here: | 2035 |
| State average: | 1876 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 8
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 2015 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 2018 |
| State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 53| Here: | 1966 |
| State average: | 1821 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 2046 |
| State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 92%| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 2050 |
| State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 35| Here: | 2015 |
| State average: | 1901 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 514
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 86| Here: | 727 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 16
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 498
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 75| Here: | 718 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 514
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 85| Here: | 733 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 10
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 10
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 498
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 79| Here: | 730 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 497
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%| Here: | 325 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 64%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%| LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 89%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.