Miami Springs Middle School in Miami Springs, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 18.

150 S ROYAL POINCIANA BLVD
Miami Springs, FL 33166

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (17.5 miles):

98
Coral Way K-8 Center School (5.5 miles):

75
Young Womens Preparatory Academy School (4.8 miles):

64
Glades Middle School (8.7 miles):

52
Attucks Middle School (17.4 miles):

35
Opa-Locka Elementary School (6.4 miles):

23
Miami Springs Middle School:

18
Charter On The Beach Middle School (9.2 miles):

8
Young Mens Academy For Academic And Civic Development At Miami Douglas Macarthur North Senior High School (7.7 miles):

0
Miami Springs Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami Springs:

45
Miami Springs Middle School:

18

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 888-6457 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6521
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 887-5281
Magnet Program.
Principal: Maria C Mason
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 111
Senate District: 40
School Web Address: http://msms.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

38%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

517
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

83%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1652 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1652 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 581
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1542
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1511

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1542
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1510
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 228 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 211

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 211
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1321 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1321 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 466
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1225
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1207

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1224
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1206
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1365 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1365 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 466
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1262
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1239

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1262
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1238
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 308 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 308 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 235

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 235
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 152 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

34%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

519
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1806 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1805 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 604
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1662
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1630

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1661
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1631
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 271 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 271 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 244
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 243

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 244
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 243
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1417 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1416 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 472
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1302
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1276

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1301
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1277
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1357 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1356 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 440
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1228
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1206

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1227
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1208
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 367 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 367 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 106
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 276
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 272

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 276
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 273
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 175 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 168
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 163
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

49%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

29%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

479
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1794 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1793 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 504
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1708
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1644

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1711
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1644
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 238

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 238
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1414 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1413 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 399
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1354
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1299

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1357
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1299
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1318 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1317 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 349
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1245
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1193

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1248
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1193
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 381 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 381 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 351
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 314

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 314
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

49%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

36%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

478
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

93%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1809 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1807 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 563
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1714
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1713
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 261 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 261 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 250
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1423 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1421 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 456
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1340
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1340
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1319 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1317 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 394
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1248
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1247
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 400 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 400 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 118
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 359
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 359
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

51%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

87%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

411
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1718 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1718 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 564
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1630
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1630
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 33

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 106
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 106
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 246 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 246 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 83
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 234
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 233
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1350 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1350 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 445
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1277
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1278
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1283 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1283 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 400
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1211
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1210
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 370 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 370 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 105
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 341
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 342
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 61
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 156
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 157
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

45%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

375
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1653
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1758
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1833
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

35%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

32%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1659
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

50%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1758
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1868
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1634
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

297
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1741
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1835
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1651
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

305
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1765
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

300
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1840
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 629
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1635
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1677
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1803
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1614
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1728
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1850
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

309
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

648
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

663
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

626
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

668
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

527
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

678
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 525
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

278
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1599
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

291
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1619
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1526
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 93

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1691
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1723
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1638
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 85

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1768
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1790
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1683
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 107

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1584
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1598
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1604
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1733
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1757
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1625
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 132

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1816
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1826
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1734
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 92

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 671
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 527
Mean Scale Score
Here:

668
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 601
Mean Scale Score
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

676
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 53
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 667
Mean Scale Score
Here:

659
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 54
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 527
Mean Scale Score
MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

674
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 61
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 601
Mean Scale Score
Here:

693
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 65
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 584
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

271
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 35%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 81%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami Springs, FL
  5. Miami Springs Middle School in Miami Springs, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.