Muller Elementary Magnet School in Tampa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 73.

13615 N 22ND ST
Tampa, FL 33613

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Westchase Elementary School (10.0 miles):

95
Muller Elementary Magnet School:

73
Countryside Montessori Academy School (11.8 miles):

72
Ippolito Elementary School (14.4 miles):

60
Macfarlane Park Elementary Magnet School (8.8 miles):

50
Robinson Elementary School (18.2 miles):

38
Burney Elementary School (19.3 miles):

29
Riverhills Elementary School (4.5 miles):

16
Muller Elementary Magnet School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
Muller Elementary Magnet School:

73

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 558-1355 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 3181
School type: Elementary
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 558-1359
Principal: Bonnye Taylor
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 59
Senate District: 18

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 734 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 734 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 734 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

63%
State average from 733 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 734 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 733 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 734 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

42%
State average from 734 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

536
State average from 734 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 733 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Math: NO

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 734 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

77%
State average from 735 schools:

46%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

89%
State average from 735 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 734 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 734 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

68%
State average from 734 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 735 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 735 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

602
State average from 734 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 734 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 734 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

16%
State average from 734 schools:

45%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 207 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 207 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 207
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 192

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 207
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 163
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 711 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 711 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 711 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

57%
State average from 711 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 711 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 711 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 711 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 711 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

569
State average from 711 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 711 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 711 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 711 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 195 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 197 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 191
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 184
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

83%
State average from 652 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 652 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 652 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

49%
State average from 650 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 652 schools:

72%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 652 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 652 schools:

67%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 652 schools:

69%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

567
State average from 652 schools:

553
Percent Tested
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 652 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 655 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 655 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 216 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 643 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 643 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

77%
State average from 643 schools:

81%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 643 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

84%
State average from 643 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 643 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

459
State average from 643 schools:

420
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 643 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 644 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

70%
State average from 644 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 193 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 193 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 60
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 191
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 191
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 46
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 46
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 59
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 59
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 41

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 130
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 130
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 631 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

77%
State average from 631 schools:

80%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 631 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 631 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

437
State average from 631 schools:

417
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 631 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

70%
State average from 631 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

66%
State average from 631 schools:

52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1459
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

41%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1574
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1699
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

11%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1583
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

361
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

30%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

1608
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

75%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1751
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

16%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1574
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1692
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1694
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1617
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

369
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1574
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1728
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

346
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 15%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1546
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1668
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1730
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1592
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1541
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1770
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

354
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

58
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

651
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

66
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

74
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

68
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

683
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

84
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 66
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

326
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 73%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1451
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1636
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1638
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1504
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 134

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1662
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1635
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1560
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 75

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1526
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1644
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1640
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1508
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 132

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1723
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1710
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1587
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 124

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78
Mean Scale Score
Here:

642
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 68
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 67
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 70
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 77
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 67
Mean Scale Score
Here:

661
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 82
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 70
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 82
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 67
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

325
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 73%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
MULLER ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 52%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 90%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Tampa, FL
  5. Muller Elementary Magnet School in Tampa, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.