City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
67.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Ozona Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Pinellas County: | 51 |
Palm Harbor: | 66 |
Ozona Elementary School: | 67 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (727) 724-1589 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 3071
School type: Elementary
District Name: PINELLAS
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 724-1591
Principal: Kerry B Apuzzo
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 45
Senate District: 11
School Web Address: http://www.ozona-es.pinellas.k12.fl.us
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 88% |
State average from 963 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 88% |
State average from 963 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 92% |
State average from 963 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 66% |
State average from 962 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 64% |
State average from 963 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 61% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 51% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 60% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 570 |
State average from 963 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 99% |
State average from 963 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 25% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 12% |
State average from 963 schools: | 47% |
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 418 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 417 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 129
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 414
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 406
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 414
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 406
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 361 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 360 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 113
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 358
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 352
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 358
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 352
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 91% |
State average from 959 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 90% |
State average from 959 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 95% |
State average from 959 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 65% |
State average from 959 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 70% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 67% |
State average from 959 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 69% |
State average from 959 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 61% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 608 |
State average from 959 schools: | 560 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 959 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 21% |
State average from 959 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 14% |
State average from 959 schools: | 46% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 350 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 350 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 115
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 332
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 332
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 302 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 302 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 105
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 296
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 287
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 296
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 287
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 91% |
State average from 954 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 89% |
State average from 954 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 96% |
State average from 954 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 57% |
State average from 954 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 66% |
State average from 954 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 72% |
State average from 954 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 53% |
State average from 954 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 75% |
State average from 954 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 599 |
State average from 954 schools: | 544 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 954 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 18% |
State average from 954 schools: | 51% |
Minority RateHere: | 13% |
State average from 954 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 349 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 349 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 112
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 338
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 337
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 313 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 313 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 97
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 310
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 308
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 310
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 307
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 86% |
State average from 862 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 78% |
State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 76% |
State average from 862 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 69% |
State average from 862 schools: | 43% |
Making Reading GainsOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 69% |
State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere: | 58% |
State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 52% |
State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 60% |
State average from 862 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 548 |
State average from 862 schools: | 539 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 862 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 42% |
State average from 865 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 25% |
State average from 865 schools: | 56% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 281 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 269
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 267
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 209 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 208 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 37% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 86% |
State average from 848 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 80% |
State average from 848 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 78% |
State average from 848 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 66% |
State average from 848 schools: | 62% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 66% |
State average from 848 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 62% |
State average from 848 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 438 |
State average from 848 schools: | 413 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 848 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 46% |
State average from 848 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 23% |
State average from 848 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 290 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 290 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 72
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 273
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 273
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 50
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 213
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 213
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 32
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 119
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 119
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 39% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 86% |
State average from 834 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 77% |
State average from 834 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 86% |
State average from 834 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 67% |
State average from 834 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 69% |
State average from 834 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 63% |
State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 448 |
State average from 834 schools: | 412 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 834 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 46% |
State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Minority RateOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 24% |
State average from 832 schools: | 54% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1554 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 342 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 28% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 44% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 88% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1729 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 345 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 31% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 36% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 20% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 86% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 21 |
State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1702 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 12% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 35% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 77% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 2 |
State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1847 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 14% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 31% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 38% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 79% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 10% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 26% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 48% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 13% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 3% |
State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 64% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1616 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 368 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 21% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 41% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 28% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 91% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1699 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 356 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 10% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 31% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 24% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 87% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1724 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 345 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 17% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 34% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 74% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1790 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 21% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 38% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 25% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 72% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1572 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 345 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1721 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 343 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 04%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1780 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1691 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 308 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1643 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 374 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 35%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1668 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 349 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1774 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 355 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1708 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 318 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 119
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1583 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 347 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1748 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1704 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 320 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1770 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1617 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 369 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1683 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 352 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1730 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1744 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 112 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 650 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 670 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 16 |
State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 124 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 680 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18)OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 9 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 686 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 112
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 330 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 79%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1527 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1504 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1531 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1355 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 176
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1627 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1626 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006OZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1538 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 88
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1770 |
State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1776 |
State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1647 |
State average: | 1592 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 129
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1578 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 360 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1487 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 307 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1500 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1467 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 33
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1633 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 325 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1631 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1510 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 120
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1714 |
State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1713 |
State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1661 |
State average: | 1620 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 52
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 69
Mean Scale ScoreOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 652 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 76
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 82
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 636 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 56
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64
Mean Scale ScoreOZONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 670 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 62
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 683 |
State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR: 75
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 69
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 649 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 82
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 644 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 71
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 658 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 62
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 678 |
State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 82
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 282 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 49%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 66%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 49%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Palm Harbor, FL
- Ozona Elementary School in Palm Harbor, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2023 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: