Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Whitestone Elementary School in Leander, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 68
Address
 2000 CRYSTAL FALLS PKWY
Leander, TX 78641
Telephone
(512) 570-7400
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
68
Students
733
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
53.3
Free lunch eligible students
224
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
39
School district
LEANDER ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I targeted assistance school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
WILLIAM J WINKLEY EL (0.8 miles):

80
LEANDER MIDDLE (2.0 miles):

80
FOUNDERS CLASSICAL ACADEMY OF LEANDER (1.9 miles):

79
RUNNING BRUSHY MIDDLE (1.3 miles):

76
LEANDER H S (1.3 miles):

71
Whitestone Elementary School:

68
C C MASON EL (2.0 miles):

54
CHRISTINE CAMACHO EL (1.9 miles):

52
PATRICIA KNOWLES EL (1.2 miles):

25
Whitestone Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Williamson County:

63
Leander:

65
Whitestone Elementary School:

68

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 733
Enrollment in 2015: 803
Enrollment in 2014: 831
Enrollment in 2013: 797
Enrollment in 2012: 789
Enrollment in 2011: 794
Enrollment in 2010: 774
Enrollment in 2009: 787
Enrollment in 2008: 626
Enrollment in 2007: 563
Enrollment in 2006: 515
Enrollment in 2005: 494
Enrollment in 2004: 790
Enrollment in 2003: 896
Enrollment in 2002: 751
Enrollment in 2001: 678
Enrollment in 2000: 725
Enrollment in 1999: 892

Whitestone Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students42135100118114100124733
Female students22565156544458341
Male students20794962605666392
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - - - 1 - - 1
Asian students2 - 3121211
Hispanic students28534147403846293
Black students - 22214314
White students10744965625467381
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - - 1 - - 1
Two or More Races students265373632

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 42
Kindergarten enrollment: 135
1st grade enrollment: 100
2nd grade enrollment: 118
3rd grade enrollment: 114
4th grade enrollment: 100
5th grade enrollment: 124

Whitestone Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 341 (46.5%)
Here:

46.5%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 392 (53.5%)
Whitestone Elementary School:

53.5%
Texas:

50.1%

Whitestone Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
Whitestone Elementary School:

0.1%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 11 (1.5%)
Here:

1.5%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 293 (40.0%)
School:

40.0%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 14 (1.9%)
Whitestone Elementary School:

1.9%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 381 (52.0%)
Here:

52.0%
State:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
School:

0.1%
State:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 32 (4.4%)
Whitestone Elementary School:

4.4%
State:

2.1%

Whitestone Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 263 (35.9%)
Whitestone Elementary School:

35.9%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 224 (30.6%)
Whitestone Elementary School:

30.6%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 39 (5.3%)
Here:

5.3%
Texas:

6.2%

Whitestone Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 53.3

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 1
Number of FTE psychologists: 0.5

Student/Teacher Ratio
Whitestone Elementary School:

13.7
State:

15.6

Whitestone Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,616,128
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 45.6 (Salary Expenditures: $2,264,174)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $17,884)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $192,722)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $141,348)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,618,265
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $3,347,855
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,650,248
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 11.4 (Salary Expenditures: $216,396)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6.1 (Salary Expenditures: $339,863)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $141,348)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $3,142,198

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic178
  • Asian2
  • White4
  • IDEA13
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 184 (male: 94, female: 90)
  • Hispanic: 178 (male: 92, female: 86)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 13 (male: 8, female: 5)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 58 (male: 35, female: 23)
  • Hispanic: 20 (male: 13, female: 7)
  • White: 38 (male: 22, female: 16)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 14 (male: 10, female: 4)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 38 (male: 25, female: 13)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • White: 25 (male: 17, female: 8)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

1.5%
Texas:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
School:

2.0%
State:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Whitestone Elementary School:

1.7%
Texas:

4.8%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic22
  • Asian4
  • White52
  • Multirace8
  • LEP10
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 86 (male: 36, female: 50)
  • Hispanic: 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 52 (male: 20, female: 32)
  • Two or More Races: 8 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Whitestone Elementary School:

117.3
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,485
  • Males1,503
  • Females1,465
  • Hispanic1,442
  • White1,511
  • Multirace1,540
Math Average Scale Score:

1,485
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 108
# Absent - Not Tested: 3
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 111

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

24%
29%
18%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,503, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 33%)
23%
28%
16%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,465, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 24%)
25%
30%
21%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,442, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 22%)
36%
28%
14%
22%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,511, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 31%)
18%
25%
26%
31%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,540, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
50%
17%
33%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,463
  • Males1,449
  • Females1,478
  • Hispanic1,427
  • White1,476
  • Multirace1,521
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,463
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 87
# Absent - Not Tested: 3
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 90

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

13%
42%
17%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,449, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 22%)
13%
45%
20%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,478, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 33%)
12%
40%
15%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,427, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 29%)
33%
17%
21%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,476, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 59%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 29%)
4%
59%
8%
29%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,521, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 33%)
17%
50%
33%

3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 2
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 2


    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,379
  • Males1,353
  • Females1,413
  • Hispanic1,379
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,379
State:

956
Reading students tested: 23
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 23

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.4 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.3 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

35%
35%
13%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,353, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 15%)
46%
31%
8%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,413, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
20%
40%
20%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,379, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 17%)
35%
35%
13%
17%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,547
  • Males1,551
  • Females1,544
  • Hispanic1,525
  • White1,566
Math Average Scale Score:

1,547
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 145
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 145

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.9 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

27%
33%
19%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,551, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 20%)
30%
29%
21%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,544, Tested: 74, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 22%)
24%
37%
17%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,525, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 7%)
29%
44%
20%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,566, Tested: 80, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 30%)
25%
27%
18%
30%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,549
  • Males1,553
  • Females1,546
  • Hispanic1,517
  • White1,562
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,549
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 124
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 124

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

23%
22%
27%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,553, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 32%)
22%
21%
25%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,546, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 25%)
23%
24%
28%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,517, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 14%)
23%
31%
32%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,562, Tested: 80, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 33%)
21%
21%
25%
33%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,798
  • Males3,696
  • Females3,895
  • Hispanic3,686
  • White3,841
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,798
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 121
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 121

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.5 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.8 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

34%
29%
23%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,696, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 8%)
36%
37%
19%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,895, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 19%)
32%
21%
28%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,686, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 9%)
34%
44%
13%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,841, Tested: 80, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
33%
25%
29%
14%

4th Grade (Spanish)

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,416
  • Males1,421
  • Females1,411
  • Hispanic1,416
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,416
State:

815
Reading students tested: 21
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 21

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.6 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.9 (45%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

48%
28%
19%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,421, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 9%)
45%
28%
18%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,411, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
50%
30%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,416, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 5%)
48%
28%
19%
5%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,497
  • Males3,218
  • Females3,777
  • Hispanic3,497
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,497
State:

2,017
Writing students tested: 24
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.1 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

50%
21%
25%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,218, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 0%)
67%
25%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,777, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 8%)
33%
17%
42%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,497, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 4%)
50%
21%
25%
4%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,670
  • Males1,667
  • Females1,674
  • Hispanic1,651
  • White1,668
  • Multirace1,752
Math Average Scale Score:

1,670
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 127
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 127

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.7 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 39%

10%
23%
28%
39%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,667, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 41%)
11%
25%
23%
41%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,674, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 38%)
10%
20%
32%
38%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 31%)
15%
18%
36%
31%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,668, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 41%)
10%
24%
25%
41%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,752, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 67%)
11%
22%
67%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,628
  • Males1,628
  • Females1,628
  • Hispanic1,613
  • White1,621
  • Multirace1,709
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,628
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 105
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.6 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.4 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 37%

13%
20%
30%
37%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
11%
22%
34%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 41%)
16%
17%
26%
41%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 35%)
15%
16%
34%
35%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,621, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 33%)
13%
23%
31%
33%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,709, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 67%)
33%
67%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,013
  • Males4,097
  • Females3,918
  • Hispanic3,979
  • White3,995
  • Multirace4,103
Science Average Scale Score:

4,013
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 100
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 100

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.6 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

10%
42%
22%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,097, Tested: 53, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 32%)
6%
43%
19%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,918, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 19%)
15%
40%
26%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,979, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 24%)
19%
29%
28%
24%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,995, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 23%)
7%
50%
20%
23%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,103, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
11%
22%
34%
33%

5th Grade (Spanish)

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,606
  • Males1,522
  • Females1,676
  • Hispanic1,606
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,606
Texas:

683
Reading students tested: 22
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 22

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.4 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

23%
22%
28%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,522, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 10%)
40%
20%
30%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,676, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 42%)
8%
25%
25%
42%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,606, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 27%)
23%
22%
28%
27%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,718
  • Males3,724
  • Females3,713
  • Hispanic3,718
Science Average Scale Score:

3,718
Texas:

857
Science students tested: 26
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 26

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.2 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 54%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

23%
54%
15%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,724, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 9%)
18%
55%
18%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,713, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 7%)
27%
53%
13%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,718, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 54%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 8%)
23%
54%
15%
8%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic19
  • Asian2
  • Black4
  • White22
  • Multirace4
  • LEP7
  • IDEA7
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 51 (male: 28, female: 23)
  • Hispanic: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 22 (male: 11, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Whitestone Elementary School:

69.6
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • White5
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 5 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Leander, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents