
Back to: Wesley Chapel, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 43.
2909 MANSFIELD BLVD
Wesley Chapel, FL 33543
Other nearby schools ratings:
Wiregrass Ranch High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Pasco County:  43  Wesley Chapel:  48  Wiregrass Ranch High School:  43 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Phone: (813) 7942000 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 51
School number: 90
School type: Senior High
District Name: PASCO
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 7942091
Principal: Ray Bonti
School Web Address: WWW.PASCO.K12.FL.US
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  87%  State average from 451 schools:  62% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  77%  State average from 451 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  83%  State average from 452 schools:  86% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  55%  State average from 451 schools:  48% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  79%  State average from 452 schools:  58% 
Making Math GainsHere:  65%  State average from 449 schools:  72% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  73%  State average from 452 schools:  52% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  73%  State average from 452 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  592  State average from 452 schools:  522 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 450 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  28%  State average from 454 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  14%  State average from 454 schools:  47% 
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 144 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  84%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 135
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  73%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 135
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 125 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 118
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 118
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 46
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 27
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  82%  State average from 443 schools:  60% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  76%  State average from 440 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  78%  State average from 443 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  65%  State average from 443 schools:  46% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  68%  State average from 441 schools:  59% 
Making Math GainsHere:  55%  State average from 442 schools:  72% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  60%  State average from 442 schools:  56% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  47%  State average from 441 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  531  State average from 441 schools:  522 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 448 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Math: NO
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  29%  State average from 446 schools:  46% 
Minority RateHere:  15%  State average from 451 schools:  45% 
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 128
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 128
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  84%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 113
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  73%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 113
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 38
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 35
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  88%  State average from 425 schools:  61% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  70%  State average from 425 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  48%  State average from 425 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  40%  State average from 425 schools:  45% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  78%  State average from 425 schools:  61% 
Making Math GainsHere:  55%  State average from 425 schools:  74% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  83%  State average from 425 schools:  55% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  67%  State average from 425 schools:  71% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  529  State average from 425 schools:  526 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 425 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  21%  State average from 425 schools:  42% 
Minority RateHere:  13%  State average from 425 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 118
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 118
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 102
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 102
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 23
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  79%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 31
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  41%  State average from 370 schools:  45% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  68%  State average from 370 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  91%  State average from 370 schools:  84% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  39%  State average from 370 schools:  41% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  47%  State average from 370 schools:  52% 
Making Math GainsHere:  70%  State average from 370 schools:  71% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  47%  State average from 370 schools:  49% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  56%  State average from 370 schools:  67% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  459  State average from 370 schools:  482 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 370 schools:  97% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  26%  State average from 372 schools:  38% 
Minority RateWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  47%  State average from 372 schools:  48% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 722 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 720 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  95%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 282
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  38%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 667
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 665
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 377 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 375 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  96%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 141
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 357
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 355
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  95%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  27%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 188 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 188 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  23%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  46%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1479  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  8%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  45%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  34%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  89%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  4  State average:  4 
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1741  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  347  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  13%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  23%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  34%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  25%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  81%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1698  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  11%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  11%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  37%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  34%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  79%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  4  State average:  3 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  11  State average:  10 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1995  State average:  1922 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  14%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  30%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  13%  State average:  12% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  56%  State average:  45% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2008  State average:  1938 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  302 
Percent PassingHere:  64%  State average:  56% 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  26%  State average:  35% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  34%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  20%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  11%  State average:  12% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  40%  State average:  37% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  19%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  30%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  41%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  51%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  22%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  35%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  44%  State average:  36% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  7  State average:  7 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1490  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  341  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  23%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  23%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  75%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1663  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  347  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  30%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  34%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  19%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  83%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1622  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  34%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  26%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  26%  State average:  28% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  53%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  1987  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  7%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  19%  State average:  22% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  29%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  74%  State average:  61% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  4  State average:  4 
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2029  State average:  1995 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  334  State average:  326 
Percent PassingHere:  87%  State average:  80% 
% in each Achievement Level 1WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  7%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  41%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  77%  State average:  69% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  1469  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1624  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  327  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1672  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1975  State average:  1907 
Mean Scale Score 100500WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  322  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  1996  State average:  1921 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  299 
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  1457  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  334  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1504  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1660  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1979  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2012  State average:  1972 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  330  State average:  321 
Percent Passing: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 44
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 80%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 461
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 82%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1372  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  312  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1671  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1767  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1951  State average:  1894 
Mean Scale Score 100500WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  317  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1968  State average:  1935 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  302 
Percent Passing: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1339  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1541  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1634  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1966  State average:  1915 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2004  State average:  1984 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  323 
Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  627  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Informational (max 18)WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  13  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  14  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  660  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Functional (max 18)WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  14  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  44  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  677  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Median NPRWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  80  State average:  71 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  10  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  430  State average:  273 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  699  State average from 2275 schools:  694 
Functional (max 18)WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  12  State average:  11 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  378  State average:  237 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  711  State average from 2096 schools:  709 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  10  State average:  10 
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 41
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  269  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 29%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 41%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 408
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  312  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 62%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  CombinedWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  4  State average:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 88%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1915  State average from 612 schools:  1849 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  298 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 78%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1929  State average:  1837 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  1882  State average:  1779 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 47
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1928  State average from 573 schools:  1879 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  300  State average:  291 
Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1967  State average:  1873 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  1973  State average:  1876 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1918  State average from 613 schools:  1884 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  300  State average:  290 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 78%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1927  State average:  1869 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1889  State average:  1821 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 37
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1974  State average from 581 schools:  1950 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  315 
Percent Passing: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007WIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  1989  State average:  1939 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1952  State average:  1901 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 37
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 386
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  704  State average from 597 schools:  696 
Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 278
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  700  State average from 575 schools:  695 
Median NPR: 58
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 386
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  713  State average from 597 schools:  708 
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 278
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  712  State average from 575 schools:  710 
Median NPR: 62
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 301
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  306  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 55%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  CombinedWIREGRASS RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:  4  State average:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 86%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 72%
