Why God cannot exist!
Posted 01-14-2013 at 06:17 PM by Carneades-SkepticGriggsy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carneades-SkepticGriggsy
Nature is -place holder for what? Oh, its causes that need no supernatural boss as science indeed shows how and why. The why of the theologian is just that superfluity, that place- holder of non-explanatory power!
Keith Parsons, fellow atheologian cries out : " Occult power wielded by a transcendent being in an inscrutable manner for unfathomable purposes does not seem to be any sort of a good answer."
The scrutable paradox is that this Grand Mystery, surrounded by yet even more, ostensibly to be that ultimate answer ends up explaining nothing whatsoever!
Theists obscure the intelligible, when paradoxically claiming that without Him, why, the Cosmos would be unintelligible, but as Victor Stenger's book " The Comprehensible Universe" explains how it is indeed intelligible without out bringing in that deus ex machine!
That obscurantism called God, that useless superfluity, plays no role in the Cosmos. Why, He couldn't even be that deistic God that just started it, because no evidence at all suggests such.
How then can people have a relationship with that superfluity?
Why, theists here haven't even responded to specific arguments but just use their warn out assumption!
We wouldn't be atheists had we permitted Him that role! We beg no question in demanding evidence instead of faith or misinterpretations of evidence.
Do we, despite the notorious Alvin Plantinga, need to posit Him perhaps, to explain our errors, natural horrors or why things work as they do?
No, obfuscation also cannot instantiate Him!
By the way no rational or -moral being wants worship, that love of tyrants! We are free beings over whom He'd have no rights, none to judge nor punish us, especially with that immoral Hell!He'd face that one-way street of having has to put us into a better place in the first place as that thread Fr. Mesiier's the problem of Heaven well establishes!
Keith Parsons, fellow atheologian cries out : " Occult power wielded by a transcendent being in an inscrutable manner for unfathomable purposes does not seem to be any sort of a good answer."
The scrutable paradox is that this Grand Mystery, surrounded by yet even more, ostensibly to be that ultimate answer ends up explaining nothing whatsoever!
Theists obscure the intelligible, when paradoxically claiming that without Him, why, the Cosmos would be unintelligible, but as Victor Stenger's book " The Comprehensible Universe" explains how it is indeed intelligible without out bringing in that deus ex machine!
That obscurantism called God, that useless superfluity, plays no role in the Cosmos. Why, He couldn't even be that deistic God that just started it, because no evidence at all suggests such.
How then can people have a relationship with that superfluity?
Why, theists here haven't even responded to specific arguments but just use their warn out assumption!
We wouldn't be atheists had we permitted Him that role! We beg no question in demanding evidence instead of faith or misinterpretations of evidence.
Do we, despite the notorious Alvin Plantinga, need to posit Him perhaps, to explain our errors, natural horrors or why things work as they do?
No, obfuscation also cannot instantiate Him!
By the way no rational or -moral being wants worship, that love of tyrants! We are free beings over whom He'd have no rights, none to judge nor punish us, especially with that immoral Hell!He'd face that one-way street of having has to put us into a better place in the first place as that thread Fr. Mesiier's the problem of Heaven well establishes!
Total Comments 0
