Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alaska
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-16-2012, 01:29 PM
 
Location: Anchorage
261 posts, read 505,831 times
Reputation: 123

Advertisements

In the last few years I've been going on a lot of very long hikes and am camping more. I've been thinking about carrying a firearm for protection. Any recomendations or advice people would give me would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-16-2012, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Dangling from a mooses antlers
7,308 posts, read 14,683,214 times
Reputation: 6238
I'd recommend a handgun. And the main reason is that if you have it holstered on your belt you'll always have it with you. Seen too many people that carry a shotgun or rifle and then get tired of carrying it. Usually ends up next to a tree or left in the tent. When you need it you won't have time to look for it.

I carry a Smith and Wesson model 329. It's a 44 magnum. With that said I also carry a big canister of bear spray. I'm sure others will chime in with their opinions. Figure out what will work best for you and your uses and then practice with it... Good luck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 01:38 PM
 
118 posts, read 261,367 times
Reputation: 120
12 gauge slug gun, marlin guide gun in 45-70. Any large caliber long gun should do the trick. A side arm is a good insurance policy too, just make sure to practice a lot so that when the time comes to use it you are confident in your abilities.

Your best defense is to just pay attention to your surroundings and avoid situations that will require the use of said firearm.

Last edited by NorthwestRepublic; 04-16-2012 at 01:47 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Anchorage Suburbanites and part time Willowbillies
1,708 posts, read 1,860,367 times
Reputation: 885
This was discussed in an earlier post:


An old time hiker......
….told me that the best bear defense is a .22 caliber handgun, tennis shoes, and a hiking partner.



Make sure you wear the tennis shoes and when confronted with a bear shoot your hiking partner in the knee and RUN!


https://www.city-data.com/forum/alask...e-against.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 02:16 PM
 
811 posts, read 1,316,796 times
Reputation: 317
A Ruger 4", S&W 629, 44 Mag, 45LC with a good hard cast bullet would do the job. Practice, practice is key. An a made in AK holster to top it off.

DIAMOND D CUSTOM LEATHER
Wasilla, AK
Guides Choice Chest Holster, Original Alaskan Holster
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 03:01 PM
 
Location: Palmer
2,519 posts, read 7,029,951 times
Reputation: 1395
The most important defense is the one you are able to deploy quickly when the need arises. If you use a handgun I would use as large a revolver as you can shoot. My 25 year old daughter carries a SW 629 in a chest holster as well as bear spray in a belt holster when she is in the field. She has not yet been forced to use either.

A geologist on the same project but with another firm was mauled a couple summers ago. He had a 357 but for some reason didn't use it and played dead instead. He survived but was in bad shape. He recuperated enough to go out in the field again last summer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Puna, Hawaii
4,410 posts, read 4,893,246 times
Reputation: 8038
With the exception of a very few areas I would recommend no gun at all unless you are hunting. 14 years exploring Alaska and I've never needed a gun. I've had a few close encounters over the years and used the most powerful weapon- my brain. While camping my dogs keep the bears away and alert me when they get close but while hiking dogs can make it worse if they take off after a bear, get hurt, and then run back to you (with bear in tow). Dogs seem to work best when there is a "base". I did know a guy who's dog was killed by wolves but it probably wouldn't have happened if he was around or the dog wasn't tied up. Another downside to dogs is that they always find every porcupine around (bring a leatherman). The places that are truly dangerous should probably be explored with a guide. And they will bring the gun if its needed. But if you are set on getting one, I would recommend a hand gun, and don't take it out into the woods until you are proficient at using it. And when you do have a "situation" it will probably be over before you get your gun drawn, though you may feel more confident having it available I haven't seen any statistics that a gun actually improves safety. It's just one more thing to haul around, try to protect, and be worried that the "bear" you hear in the woods is actually another hiker but you don't realize it until you're pointing a gun at them. Not a great way to meet, especially if adrenaline is pumping and your finger is on the trigger. I have guns in the house, I am pro-gun rights, but in my experience bears, wolves etc will go out of their way to avoid you and I always considered carrying a gun to be too big of a hassle to be worth it. There are a lot more stories of gun accidents than bear maulings. Again, there are some areas in Alaska where carrying a gun should be a requirement, but what is it, like 1% of the state? You could live here 100 years and still not have enough time to see the other 99%. I've only met one person who was mauled by a bear and he was carrying a gun when it happened. It wasn't strapped to his hip, it was in his hands. The event was over before he had a chance to aim, and he lost both his eyes in the mauling. Did the gun give him false confidence that led to the mauling? If you feel the need to turn around or leave an area you should do it- don't believe that a gun is going to protect you. Everybody I know who carries a gun does it out of machismo, not common sense. I used to carry pepper spray (a smaller can, not an actual "bear spray") because its light, easy to carry, not going to accidentally shoot somebody etc... but everytime I had an encounter was the only times I had forgotten to take it. Now I don't even bother with that. I'm far more likely to die or get injured on the drive to the trailhead than I am to get injured by wildlife in the woods. Heck, I'm more likely to get hurt in a fall or die of a heart attack out hiking than having a bear usher me into the afterlife. To me, the hassle isn't worth it. And if you don't already have one, is spending all that money on something you're never going to need really worth it? (or may actually make you more likely to get attacked due to mistaken sense of protection) The odds of getting mauled by a bear are 1 in 2 million (if you are in bear country). The odds of getting struck by lightening is 1 in a million (if you are in lightening country). If you don't walk around with a grounded lightening rod, why would you walk around with a gun when your odds are 2x more likely to be struck by lightening? Probably because walking around with a grounded lightening rod doesn't make your "rod" seem bigger.

"From 1980 to 2002, more than 62 million people visited Yellowstone, spending roughly 17 million camping hours in the park, according to Kerry A. Gunther of the park's Bear Management Office. Over that time, 32 were injured in encounters with bears, resulting in a ratio of 1.4 injuries per year from bear attacks.

Thus, one's chances of being hurt by a bear at Yellowstone (assuming a similar number of camping hours per year) are approximately 1 in 2 million.

By comparison, the odds of being struck by lightning in a given year are 1 in a million, according to figures provided by the National Weather Service. And the chance of being struck by lightning over the course of an 80-year lifespan is 1 in 10,000. " The chances of being affected (10 people affected for every 1 person struck) by lightening is 1 in a 1,000 over your lifetime.

I would say the Yellowstone figures are actually high- meaning more chance to get attacked there than in Alaska. The bears in Yellowstone are largely habituated to humans and have lost their natural fear of us. If you need to boost your machismo, go buy a big powerful gun that makes you feel safe. Just don't turn off your brain when you're out in the woods because of it. That rustling sound you hear in the woods as you reach for your big gun might be me. I understand I'm probably more likely to get shot in the woods than get killed by a bear- doesn't mean I want it to happen.

Last edited by terracore; 04-16-2012 at 04:05 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 03:35 PM
 
Location: Anchorage Suburbanites and part time Willowbillies
1,708 posts, read 1,860,367 times
Reputation: 885
Learn to Return has a great course "Bear Awareness and Defense Training".

LTR Training Systems (http://www.survivaltraining.com/about.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 03:51 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, AK
2,795 posts, read 5,612,445 times
Reputation: 2530
I carry a .45 semi auto in a chest hostler because it's what I have. I'd prefer a .44 . I have a .357 but it's heavier than my .45 .
I carry for moose, not bear.

But, I'd recommend being very proficient with it. I took a defensive shooting class at the gun range last year and it completely changed my outlook on carrying for protection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 04:21 PM
 
26,639 posts, read 36,686,990 times
Reputation: 29906
I sometimes carry a small pistol, although not really for bears or wolves. CC can tell you (and will, every chance he gets) that I am not a very good shot (though he just might find himself surprised one of these days...). I carry it if I'm going out alone somewhere so that if I fall and break my ankle, someone might find me if I fire a shot or two.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alaska
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top