Why does Australia have a smaller population than Canada's?

[danielsa1775]

Originally Posted by c charlie

Mate, did you INTENTIONALLY refer to yourself in the third person?

If so, that suggests that apart from being like a dog with a bone in an argument in which he is simply wrong, Troubador needs to get his hand off it and get over himself.


For those of you who don't speak Australian: Troubadour is being intransigent in an argument in which he is simply wrong. Referring to oneself in the third person is pretentious. Something Charlie would never do.

Its also readily apparent that he believes he is intelligent.

[the troubadour]

Originally Posted by c charlie

Mate, did you INTENTIONALLY refer to yourself in the third person?

If so, that suggests that apart from being like a dog with a bone in an argument in which he is simply wrong, Troubador needs to get his hand off it and get over himself.


For those of you who don't speak Australian: Troubadour is being intransigent in an argument in which he is simply wrong. Referring to oneself in the third person is pretentious. Something Charlie would never do.

What is more to the point of course is what's the biff the above poster appears to have regardless how this poster references self, which is understandable from troubadours perspective considering the sustained assault this poster is enduring.
The above poster would be better 'keeping their hands ' off interfering with others and go about own 'business' in regards to what they are referencing in above reply. Who do you think you are to suggest as much and to go on to use abusive language in the process?
For those that do have a very average comprehension of the English, never mind 'Aussie talk' which I seldom use, somewhat highly pretentious to suggest in itself to which apparently is something Charlie would certainly do, but certainly falls by the wayside with own assertion.
Charlie old bean, if it's all too much for you and you are unable to conduct a proper dialogue' along with some of the others, why not just refrain from posting and deal with your obvious issues.
You see how you may or may not go about things compared to myself may vastly differ and approaching it differently, often in jest, as hard to take this lot in general very seriously, but responding to frontal attacks and abuse in ways I see fit does not constitute being intransient in an argument. Fact being most do not like view challenged nor to explain how arrived at such a position but prefer to go on a personal attack. Fine by me

[the troubadour]

Originally Posted by danielsa1775

Its also readily apparent that he believes he is intelligent.

If you so insist. But what is more apparent is that 'he' is one of the few actually attempting a form of debate , enliven a too often dormant irrelevant thread, with questioning and at times seeking accountability to some of the weird and often uncalled out bias.