Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-06-2015, 09:55 PM
 
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
11,222 posts, read 16,458,058 times
Reputation: 13536

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
My first two cars were manuals so I will always be biased towards manual
I just bought a Ford Focus hatchback manual, it doesn't have much power but it can be fun to drive.

Aside from the fun factor, I think manual transmissions last longer and are cheaper to fix (clutch) than automatic transmissions.
And if your battery dies, you just need to get somebody to push your car to start it.
I found it's a lot easier to do by yourself if you pop the clutch pushing it in reverse.


.....just, you know, don't screw up getting in since there is an open door coming your way. lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2015, 09:57 PM
 
Location: Oceania
8,610 posts, read 7,911,322 times
Reputation: 8318
Quote:
Originally Posted by trbstang View Post
I do have to agree with you about the worn out clutch. I've replaced the clutch in my Mustang about 4-5 times or so, for an average mileage of about 60K+ per clutch. Traffic is heck on it, so I try to commute after the main rush hour. But each clutch only cost me about $200-250 since I did the work myself. It only takes me about 4-5 hours in my garage to do the complete job now!
What brand of clutches are you putting into your Stang that cost you $200-$250?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2015, 10:12 PM
 
3,963 posts, read 5,704,943 times
Reputation: 3712
Manual transmissions will give the dullest car some semblance of life. If a car has a manual gearbox then it can put a grin on my face albeit briefly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2015, 10:27 PM
 
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
11,222 posts, read 16,458,058 times
Reputation: 13536
Quote:
Originally Posted by armory View Post
What brand of clutches are you putting into your Stang that cost you $200-$250?
Probably LuK. Clutch kits can be had for under 300 bucks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2015, 10:37 PM
 
Location: H-town, TX.
3,503 posts, read 7,514,914 times
Reputation: 2232
Quote:
Originally Posted by RayinAK View Post
Yes. Automatic transmission work costs three or four times more than manual.
Not usually. I'm guessing finding a mazda 5-speed for my old Ranger might run close to a grand. The ZF stickshifters in the heavy duty trucks aren't cheap. If you're paying 4x for a run of the mill auto trans like a 4L60E ($1400 for a beefed-up rebuild on my dad's old Chevy) or 4R70, it better be made of gold. Yeah, I get the exotic stuff, but that's not everyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2015, 05:40 AM
 
Location: Lake Norman, NC
8,877 posts, read 13,939,260 times
Reputation: 35992
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSD610 View Post
Vehicles are not toys to be played with, they are equipment that is heavy and can cause injury, damage and death if one decides it is just fine to go really fast because it is fun.

You drive a vehicle to get you from point to point as safely as possible, if you want to "drive fast just for fun" move to Germany and use the Autobahn or become a professional race car driver.
I didn't realize my grandma finally got on the internet!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2015, 08:51 AM
 
5,051 posts, read 3,591,477 times
Reputation: 6512
I have been driving a Ford Fiesta for 10 months and I think it is a nice entertaining car to drive.

However the automatic in this car is really poor . The car would be so much better with a manual even with its relatively low power. If an when the automatic needs service it will cost lots more than the manual to fix.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 03:53 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
2,052 posts, read 5,883,165 times
Reputation: 1298
Quote:
Originally Posted by armory View Post
What brand of clutches are you putting into your Stang that cost you $200-$250?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnatomicflux View Post
Probably LuK. Clutch kits can be had for under 300 bucks.
Since my car is 100% stock motor wise, I used the Ford Motorsport King Cobra or Ford Racing - FRPP heavy duty clutch kits with PP, TOB, and clutch disc from Tommie Vaughn Ford. They used to be about $169 + $30 for resurfacing the flywheel, and the last one I changed was about $220 + $40 resurfacing back in 2006 or so. They look to be about $220-240 now. The car has not been mobile since 2010, but it will need a new clutch along with the new motor since it was barely slipping again before the motor blew.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,639,819 times
Reputation: 35439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
Since they took away compound low, getting a load started with a manual transmission is really hard on the clutch. Using engine compression on downgrades still saves the brakes.


What do you mean? My truck has a low gear. 1st gear is my granny. I never use it because its such low gear. 2nd gear is my " 1st gear" from a stop. The sad thing I read that Ford completely stopped offering the ZF6 speed manual on the Superduty trucks. But I think it's because the manual can't handke 800 ft/lb of torque.
I'm assuming 1/2 ton trucks with manĂ¹al is what you're talking about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 11:31 AM
 
Location: Wichita Falls Texas
1,009 posts, read 1,993,685 times
Reputation: 1008
Oh yeah. Back when my cars were made, manuals were faster and got better mileage. Case in point, my 1970 Maverick. 200 with auto's took 14.5 to 60 and got 19 mpg. Stick shift ( with a column shifter) did the same trip in 12.3 and got 22 mpg. According to Motor Trend testing at the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top