Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-30-2021, 10:06 AM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,726,528 times
Reputation: 24590

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oklazona Bound View Post
But if the gas tax is repealed and a per mile tax replaces it it would have to be massive to generate trillions of dollars in taxes. I would guess at a minimum taxes would have to go up 20 times of what gas taxes collected. Gas would be at least equal to at least $10 per gallon.
why are you saying that it would need to generate trillions of dollars in taxes?

for some reason, it appears you are saying the gas tax only needs to generate about $43 billion but if switched to a mileage tax it needs to generate trillions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-30-2021, 10:08 AM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,704,357 times
Reputation: 23268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy100 View Post
There’s nothing unfair about a use tax. If somebody needs it for work, let them deduct it on their taxes. Then drop everybody’s portion of the income tax that goes to roads. You shouldn’t have to pay taxes on behalf of the guy who drives a 4000lb EV or hybrid to work 100 miles a day, or the guy who Uber Eats every meal and buys one Chinese built light bulb at a time from Amazon. It encourages local manufacturing and supply chains, and people living closer to work.
The current highway tax is unsustainable if the government wants everybody to drive fuel efficient vehicles and maintain the roads with gas taxes. Which one do they want?
Roughly 50% of my property tax is public education... I'm all for Use Tax... Many I know have no children and others home school or private schools.

I think you are on to something...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2021, 10:29 AM
 
30,189 posts, read 11,827,960 times
Reputation: 18698
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
why are you saying that it would need to generate trillions of dollars in taxes?

for some reason, it appears you are saying the gas tax only needs to generate about $43 billion but if switched to a mileage tax it needs to generate trillions.
The OP said this:

A vehicle mileage tax could be on the table in talks about how to finance the White House’s expected multi-trillion-dollar infrastructure proposal, according to Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.

I am saying the gas tax now generates $43 billion a year. If we are just replacing one tax with a new one with about the same revenue it won't create any new money for this multi billion dollar infrastructure plan. So taxes would have to go up and the effective cost per gallon would go way up. I just calculated an extreme example of raising taxes on driving.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2021, 10:35 AM
 
Location: North Texas
3,505 posts, read 2,669,010 times
Reputation: 11029
Maybe the government should follow the North Texas model, every road is a toll road.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2021, 11:00 AM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,726,528 times
Reputation: 24590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oklazona Bound View Post
The OP said this:

A vehicle mileage tax could be on the table in talks about how to finance the White House’s expected multi-trillion-dollar infrastructure proposal, according to Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.

I am saying the gas tax now generates $43 billion a year. If we are just replacing one tax with a new one with about the same revenue it won't create any new money for this multi billion dollar infrastructure plan. So taxes would have to go up and the effective cost per gallon would go way up. I just calculated an extreme example of raising taxes on driving.
gotcha. no matter what you do, it would have to go up drastically for that kind of money. of course, its completely unnecessary but the words "fix our aging infrastructure roads, bridges, waterways, etc." seems to get people excited.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2021, 11:22 AM
 
30,189 posts, read 11,827,960 times
Reputation: 18698
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
gotcha. no matter what you do, it would have to go up drastically for that kind of money. of course, its completely unnecessary but the words "fix our aging infrastructure roads, bridges, waterways, etc." seems to get people excited.

Its going to have to come from somewhere. Meaning taxes will have to go up to pay for it. And if they make driving more expensive then people will drive less and if its a per mile tax that tax revenue will be less than expected. If commercial vehicles will have to pay more in fuel and fuel related taxes then the cost of everything will go up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2021, 11:36 AM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,726,528 times
Reputation: 24590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oklazona Bound View Post
Its going to have to come from somewhere. Meaning taxes will have to go up to pay for it. And if they make driving more expensive then people will drive less and if its a per mile tax that tax revenue will be less than expected. If commercial vehicles will have to pay more in fuel and fuel related taxes then the cost of everything will go up.
it depends on what "it" is. we dont need to spend trillions of dollars fixing all this stuff. it just sounds good for political purposes, it wont happen and doesnt need to happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2021, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Maryland
3,798 posts, read 2,329,798 times
Reputation: 6650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oklazona Bound View Post
Its going to have to come from somewhere. Meaning taxes will have to go up to pay for it. And if they make driving more expensive then people will drive less and if its a per mile tax that tax revenue will be less than expected. If commercial vehicles will have to pay more in fuel and fuel related taxes then the cost of everything will go up.

It needs to happen. We've put off spending money on infrastructure far too long. So we HAVE to pay for it, regardless of political bent, or we're going to have to resign ourselves to driving on roads not fit for 3rd world countries and bridges that are ready to fall down at a moment's notice.


Notice the cars on this? People were USING this bridge when it went down.






And this one, which closed down I-5 for a long time:





Or this on on I-40:






And lets not even talk about other infrastructure like rail...





How do some of you propose to pay for this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2021, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Maryland
3,798 posts, read 2,329,798 times
Reputation: 6650
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
it depends on what "it" is. we dont need to spend trillions of dollars fixing all this stuff.

Yes, we do. We've been putting it off far too long and things have gotten dangerous out there. Doing it piecemeal and scrimping on it got us into a mess. We can't do it that way anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2021, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Born + raised SF Bay; Tyler, TX now WNY
8,509 posts, read 4,756,562 times
Reputation: 8431
Quote:
Originally Posted by vincenze View Post
That's the most fair way to tax those who pollute the most traveling long distances.

If freeways won't be "free", people may start using electric trains.
Not really, because the damage incurred by vehicles to roadways has more to do with the vehicle's weight than the miles traveled. Someone paying the same amount per mile in a Tahoe as someone in a Mitsubishi Mirage amounts to a tax break for the Tahoe. Fuel taxes solve some of that as there is often a correlation between vehicle weight and fuel consumption. Another way to do this would be to charge registration fees at least partly based on curb weight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top