Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-12-2011, 07:24 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,449,435 times
Reputation: 55563

Advertisements

How could they branish rifles if they were unarmed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-12-2011, 07:29 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,204,544 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
How could they branish rifles if they were unarmed
Please reread the quoted text in the OP, time elapsed between the three brandishing rifles and when the drone spotted them
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 07:40 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,878,379 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
Please reread the quoted text in the OP, time elapsed between the three brandishing rifles and when the drone spotted them
What is the proof they brandished the rifles the first time?
Because a cop said so?

Good thing police never lie or make stuff up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 10:59 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,177,123 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
If they have a search warrant for the area they are flying over, then I don't have a problem with this. But I suspect there will be many drone flights without warrants.
The don't need a search warrant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by snofarmer View Post
So everyone that is against using the drones is also against Google earth?
Can I use drones to spy on government? Or politicians? Or corporations?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
i agree with this post. as long as the police are not using the technology to try and look into our homes, i see no problem.
They are looking into your home.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Seriously, military inventions and innovations find their way into many many applications like the heads up display in my sportscar, tons and tons of electronic innovations in phones, computers....velcro was a US govt invention...and so on and so forth.
CDMA cell-phone technology, cell-phones, iPods/MP3 Players, CD/DVD players...the list is endless.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rimmerama View Post
What's the issue? The drones have to abide by the same 4th amendment restrictions as any other form of police surveillance.

Thermal imaging of a home constitutes a Fourth Amendment "search" and may be done only with a warrant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rimmerama View Post
They could break the law, but the evidence wouldn't be admissible in court, neither would any evidence later gained from that "poisonous tree."
Man are you naive.

I used to run illegal wire-taps and then get warrants through other means to legally search.

You're limited only by your imagination, and as a last resort, I can always use the "anonymous tip" or get one of my paid informants to say whatever I tell them to say.

At 1:00 AM, the judge isn't going to be talking to my informant anyway. I'm going to call the judge and fax a copy of the warrant to his home for him to sign (or drive to his home).

The sheriff here has a helicopter with forward-looking infrared and thermal imaging. They can see "grow lights," meth labs etc. It'll be there 2-3-5 days from now. Plenty of time to get a warrant together through legal means.

I used to walk through parking lots in bars/night clubs and kick tail-lights out, then sit down the road and pull people over later because "they had a tail-light out."

Usually good for a DWI and/or drug bust.

There's always a way, it just depends on how clever you are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 11:33 PM
 
1,569 posts, read 2,044,851 times
Reputation: 621
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
Sure,police would never lie.
Why did you even start this thread, then? If cops just lie about everything, then the technology they use is irrelevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 11:34 PM
 
1,569 posts, read 2,044,851 times
Reputation: 621
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post

Man are you naive.

I used to run illegal wire-taps and then get warrants through other means to legally search.

You're limited only by your imagination, and as a last resort, I can always use the "anonymous tip" or get one of my paid informants to say whatever I tell them to say.

At 1:00 AM, the judge isn't going to be talking to my informant anyway. I'm going to call the judge and fax a copy of the warrant to his home for him to sign (or drive to his home).

The sheriff here has a helicopter with forward-looking infrared and thermal imaging. They can see "grow lights," meth labs etc. It'll be there 2-3-5 days from now. Plenty of time to get a warrant together through legal means.

I used to walk through parking lots in bars/night clubs and kick tail-lights out, then sit down the road and pull people over later because "they had a tail-light out."

Usually good for a DWI and/or drug bust.

There's always a way, it just depends on how clever you are.
Cool story, bro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 11:54 PM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,568,492 times
Reputation: 4262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
I'm waiting for one of our local constitutional experts to explain to me how getting a search warrant and then using a drone to spot the 3 guys is wrong. Please, do not embelish and alter facts by claiming that next thing you know they will just fire a hellfire missle at the guys and abolish trials.
It sounds to me like they wanted to raid the place, because they called themselves a militia. I think the cattle may have just been an excuse. He wanted to search for his cattle on their 3000 acres. When denied, supposedly at gunpoint, he brought the big guns with drones. I don't like it. It is an invasion of privacy. It is a great imbalance, and puts all the advantage with the authority. When you give the gov't this kind of power, in the name of crime prevention- we have lost. This is what they mean when they say giving up liberty in the name of safety - safety for whom, certainly not for us subjects. This subjugates the rights of the individual, on private property, to the state. It's a frightening development that must not be allowed without open public discussions and input from judiciary. Prepare for the unintended consequences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2011, 06:39 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,878,379 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by rimmerama View Post
Why did you even start this thread, then? If cops just lie about everything, then the technology they use is irrelevant.
You mustn't of had much dealing with police or known many on a personal level...
The technology matters because just it is just like the lie of police being 'outgunned' and needing automatic weapons and armored vehicles...it makes matters worse.

No knock raids using militarised police are pretty much the norm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2011, 06:45 AM
 
2,149 posts, read 1,517,299 times
Reputation: 2488
Now IF these criminals HAD been armed would the Drone then taken them out with a Hellfire missile? You betcha and that is going to start soon! It will be done to 'protect" law enforcement and for the general publics "safety" of course. And don't forget all the evile "extremists/domestic terrorists" you know who the DHS/FBI has listed - Patriots, homeschoolers, Christians, anti-NWO folk, returning Iraq/Afgan Vets ect. So get ready to start seeing Drones taking out Americans in America just like they are doing globally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2011, 06:49 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,805,597 times
Reputation: 24863
In the name of safety most of us agree that intrusive police action against criminals is needed. It makes us all safer and will never be used against us because we do not commit any crime.

People have believed crazier things. There are always people attracted to policing because they consider everyone to be a criminal. The irony is that, after enough spying and repression, everyone does become a criminal in a futile attempt to keep some control over their own lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top