Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-26-2012, 02:53 PM
 
1,784 posts, read 3,459,561 times
Reputation: 1295

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801 View Post
Well, that's a relief to hear, because some people do not seem to be able to distinguish between God and the Bible.




OK, interesting, but I don't believe the Bible is infallible. Do not leap to the opposite conclusion, however, that I am also saying Scripture is of no value. It is very valuable. It just leaves too many ambiguities to be conclusive in an of itself; hence, the values of scholarship, tradition, and reason.



I don't appreciate being paraphrased, thank you. The "musings of men" are not my words, nor are "completely uninspired" and "absolutely nothing comparable..." I do not see the world in absolutes of black and white. Do not reword what I said to fit that view.

Your presumption that I do not read the epistles is erroneous and would be offensive were I a person who is that easily offended. I am Episcopalian. We probably read more scripture in church on any given Sunday than any other denomination, and most, if not all, services include a reading from one of the epistles.

I have difficulty having conversations in media such as this for the reason you kindly demonstrated above. If I say "I think the sky is not just blue, but has other colors in it as well," and you respond with "So what you are REALLY saying is that the sky always has pink in it" when that's not what I said at all, we cannot converse.

And now perhaps you can see why I prefer a Christian church that values the concept of Reason.
Or maybe not.
Alright then, I suppose I am responding to what I see should be the logical outcomes of what you said, not what you necessarily believe. My apologies. But at this point, I then move on to ask what makes the Bible unique once you strip away its divine inspiration? What is it that differentiates its wisdom from other sources? Or if you do hold to a view that it's inspired, just not in the sense I do (i.e. actually God-breathed), can you explain what that inspiration entails?

You stated "Trying to justify the words one prefers by claiming them to be God's words instead is vain and borders on blasphemy" so I need to understand what makes these words of men (since they're not God's) different than any others', and also how you reconcile using them when the authors would be clearly deluded about their source and nature of revelation and their own views of the Scripture.

Oh, and also, I did not say you did not read the Epistles - I encouraged you to reread them again, because I firmly believe there is an abundance of relevance between those churches in the 1st century and the churches today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-26-2012, 03:28 PM
 
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
2,309 posts, read 4,384,486 times
Reputation: 5355
The Intersexed by their very biological makeup would be able to marry whomever they wish whether that be male or female and still be " safe" in the eyes of God.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Free State of Texas
20,441 posts, read 12,788,798 times
Reputation: 2497
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801 View Post
It is based on the fact that humans make mistakes. It is based on the fact that humans frame things within the paradigm of what they know. It is based on the fact that the men writing the scriptures were not free of the cultural beliefs and knowledge they carried with them as assumptions of truth without even realizing that those truths might be assumptions.

As a Christian, you could believe this way because you know the history of who Paul was, how he came to almost single-handedly spread Christianity beyond the place of its origin, and how went from a persecutor of Christians to one of Christ's greatest champions. You know he spent the rest of his life obsessed with spreading the news of reconcilation with God for anyone who asks. And part of that work he did included some written letters to churches established around the Mediterranean that have been preserved for all time in which we find words that we can live by to be better Christians and better people. Amongst those words, however, we also find some distinct evidence of Paul's opinions and cultural influence, which have nothing to do with God at all, and we use our reason to discern them. So that's why, even though I'm a woman and Paul didn't think I should, I've cut my hair and I get up and speak in church sometimes despite the fact that Paul's writings say I shouldn't do that. Those statements are ridiculous, but by matter of the God-given ability to reason we can distinguish them from words like "If I speak in human or angelic tongues, but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. If I give all I possess to the poor and give over my body [to hardship] that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing. Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part, but when completeness comes, what is in part disappears. When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me. For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known. And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love."
Assuming you are correct about Paul's letters, where does that leave us with the topic at hand? What do we do with Romans 1? And Jesus words, 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh'? Is it reasonable for Christian churches to perform SSM now in modern times?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 03:40 PM
 
Location: Texas
1,767 posts, read 2,348,731 times
Reputation: 634
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmiej View Post


Love the sinner, hate the sin.



That is liberal propaganda. It is not found in holy scripture.

Under God's Law, the sinner who is found guilty of committing blasphemy, murder, homosexual acts, etc is executed.

Why does God command the death penalty for some sins? The Bible says it is to remove the evil from society.
There is no distinction between evil and evildoer, sinner and sin.


.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Free State of Texas
20,441 posts, read 12,788,798 times
Reputation: 2497
Quote:
Originally Posted by king's highway View Post
That is liberal propaganda. It is not found in holy scripture.

Under God's Law, the sinner who is found guilty of committing blasphemy, murder, homosexual acts, etc is executed.

Why does God command the death penalty for some sins? The Bible says it is to remove the evildoer from society.
There is no distinction between evil and evildoer, sinner and sin.


.
LOL! I've never been accused of being liberal.

You are of course, incorrect. God had mercy on us, despite our sin. Jesus gave His life as a ransom for me & you. It's our's to accept or reject.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Texas
1,767 posts, read 2,348,731 times
Reputation: 634
.


The phrase, "hate the sin, love the sinner" is found nowhere in the Bible.


But it is found in Gandhi's autobiography.

Quote Details: Mahatma Gandhi: Hate the sin, love... - The Quotations Page



It is not a Biblical concept.

Under God's Law, sinners are held accountable for their sins, some sins requiring the death penalty.



.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Texas
1,767 posts, read 2,348,731 times
Reputation: 634
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmiej View Post


LOL! I've never been accused of being liberal.


That's not a badge of honor in the current perverted world order where evil is called good and good is called evil even in most churches.


.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 04:21 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,511,041 times
Reputation: 7472
Quote:
Originally Posted by king's highway View Post
.


The phrase, "hate the sin, love the sinner" is found nowhere in the Bible.


But it is found in Gandhi's autobiography.

Quote Details: Mahatma Gandhi: Hate the sin, love... - The Quotations Page



It is not a Biblical concept.

Under God's Law, sinners are held accountable for their sins, some sins requiring the death penalty.



.
Neigher is the word Christmas or Easter or Trinity but we still believe in them. God gave man intelligence to name things that are talked about in the bible so we can understand them better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,465 posts, read 61,396,384 times
Reputation: 30414
Quote:
Originally Posted by julian17033 View Post
The Intersexed by their very biological makeup would be able to marry whomever they wish whether that be male or female and still be " safe" in the eyes of God.
I am not sure by what you mean when you say 'safe'.

They would certainly be allowed to marry in our church.

We are about as Fundamentalist and Pentecostal as you can find.

I am not aware of any doctrine that would suggest otherwise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,465 posts, read 61,396,384 times
Reputation: 30414
Quote:
Originally Posted by king's highway View Post
... Under God's Law, sinners are held accountable for their sins, some sins requiring the death penalty.
Up until the point when the sinner repents, finds forgiveness, and stops sinning.

God is love. Man is often hard hearted and refuses to love.

Don't forget sanctuary cities too
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top