Quote:
Originally Posted by CRSTL13
What did everybody think of the recent debate? I didn't get to see it, but have heard that it sounds like Nye posed several questions that seemed to stump Ham. Any other feedback or critique of the debate would be nice, as I mentioned I did not yet get to view it.
For example, "how if Kangaroos got off the Ark in the middle east, why are they only in Australia, and not even a fossil of one anywhere else?"
What does everybody think of the answer to this question. Being a Christian, I could care less about the fundamentals of evolution, but I'm curious to know answers like this, as I want to be able to defend my faith if I ever happen to be in a discussion with a evolutionist.
The last couple of months, I have really started diving into the bible, and my faith has been strengthened so much. Please pray for me to continue my journey.
|
The Bible teaches evolution in my good opinion. From cover to cover it is showing us and telling us that we have to overcome the nature of an animal and the sins of the whole world are put squarely on the head of an animal.
The bible doesn't have to be against evolution at all, that's just the pre conceived ideas of many, and we can KNOW BEYOND ANY DOUBT that Moses was telling a spiritual story when he spoke of the 7 days of creation, and Moses was no dummy, he didn't contradict himself on purpose.
Moses tells us that Adam was born, and 24 hours later, Eve was born, and AGAIN, Moses was no dummy. Moses tells us that in those 24 hours, Adam had named every creature living and you can't even name all the species of birds in a single decade.
But not only this, Moses tells us that Adam worked the garden tilling and sowing and reaping IN HARVESTING SO LONG, that God looked down on him and said,'' It is not good that man is alone.''
You CERTAINLY CANNOT till and sow and harvest ANYTHING in 24 hours, CERTAINLY, you can't name all the creatures in 24 hours, and you CERTAINLY CANNOT harvest something that takes months and years to do, in 24 hours.
AGAIN, Moses was no dummy, he wrote of those 7 days KNOWING that you would realize it was a spiritual story, NOT A LITERAL STORY.
Unless we are going to look at Moses like some big Dummy who does nothing but contradict himself, Moses WANTED you to know it was a spiritual story.
Zechariah 13
4And it shall come to pass in that day,
that the prophets shall be ashamed every one of his vision, when he hath prophesied; neither shall they
wear a rough garment to deceive:
Why does Elijah wear the skins of animals, and why would a person put on the skins of an animal to deceive?
By putting on the skins of an animal, you are saying THAT YOU are the hidden man within, and this HIDDEN man concept has been around a very long time before Jesus. We saw a picture of Jacob putting on the skins of an animal to deceive his father into believing that he was his brother Esau, and we have a picture of one son standing inside another son, because THERE IS a hidden man INSIDE an animal.
Wives and Husbands
(
Song of Solomon 1:1-3;
Ephesians 5:22-33)
1Likewise, ye wives,
be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives;
2While they behold your chaste conversation
coupled with fear.
3Whose adorning let it not be that outward
adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel;
4But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible,
even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price.
5For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands:
6Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement.
The bible shows humans to be animals from cover to cover where there is always an animal involved, when Adam and Eve fell, they had to be clothed in the skins of an animal, and they fell because of the voice of a beast.