Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Protesting gay marriage is some people who understand God's take on marriage voicing their opinion.
This poll makes no sense - other than attempting to squelch viewpoints some don't want to hear.
I will say this ... I don't know what's worse - gay marriage, or the fact that judges overturn people's elected representatives in making up legal excuses to overturn state bans. The more I think about it, I think the judges actions are worse. It's one thing if the people want this - but they don't, if you go by elected representatives and how they voted on the issue. Gay marriage was banned in California... California... and that was voted on by the people. Then the judge overturned it. That alone should tell us that people are not crazy about this.
At the end of the day - people want to cheat to get pet legislation passed - fine. God watches all. He will deal with it as He sees fit.
Fortunately, DR, we are not a democracy and people who are able to distinguish civilized (constitutional) principles may often countermand mob rule and, hopefully, lead the mob out of their ignorance and prejudice.
Fortunately, DR, we are not a democracy and people who are able to distinguish civilized (constitutional) principles may often countermand mob rule and, hopefully, lead the mob out of their ignorance and prejudice.
Why vote, when the judges will accept only one outcome?
Hey, let's vote on this. If we win, then we'll say the people wanted it, and if we lose, the judges will void the vote.
What does NOT make sense to me, Finn, is formulating legislation that clearly violates constitutional principles. The only possible reason is to pander to ignorance in a procedure that is expected to maintain office at the public trough.
What does NOT make sense to me, Finn, is formulating legislation that clearly violates constitutional principles.
That is pro-gay opinion, but it does not make is fact. You did not answer my question. What is the point of arranging a vote where only one outcome is accepted? It sure seems like it is done purely for the show.
That is pro-gay opinion, but it does not make is fact. You did not answer my question. What is the point of arranging a vote where only one outcome is accepted? It sure seems like it is done purely for the show.
I think that's what I said...you seem not to be aware of who the producers are.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
