Im Bi sexual (Im a Christian) (rituals, anti-gay, holiday, Georgia)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When you can leave discussion of patently harmful behaviors out of this where they do not belong, and talk about a committed relationship between two people you could possibly have something to say. Until you stop conflating such a relationship with practices that compare to adultry, profligacy, heterosexual child abuse and such things that you also KNOW are a part of the heterosexual world and are NO reflection on a real heterosexual relationship in love you have nothing to add.
Pointing to negative extremes is the way they justify bigotry.
Originally Posted by scgrahamYou say that I'm a judge, but it is the Word that judges, and all will face It. I Corinthians 6
9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Now the original posted asked a question of which there have been several answers, while others wished to admit they have never even regretted.
That is all up to them if they do so, their rights are just as fashionable as anyone else's, as most societies have never of some actions ever accepted.
Now unto the subject of children and them being taught certain things are normal, a special function of society, what is to be the actual elaborated.
Is NAMBLA another 'normal' way to view reality speaks several languages, there is no single way that is right, just everything in a big box included.
Really, and exactly just who are you to be that judge of the most correct way to approach what has been discussed?
Exactly what qualifies you as being the arbitrator of justice when such special circumstances do not exist confused.
You subtract all the time when a Christian brings a Bible-based answer that although you do not like responses add.
The question is whether NAMBLA's normal to you, does it have a place in society to exist, is that truth and to good?
You're talking spiritual principles to people with blinders on. They can't see it's the same spirit, the flesh of the victim is merely "incidental", as is the age. Peace
The question is whether NAMBLA's normal to you, does it have a place in society to exist, is that truth and to good?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroutDude
Absolutely uncalled-for, ridiculous, and frankly-stupid insinuation.
You would be laughable if you didn't vote or breed.
Really, why can't your boyfriend answer for himself?
Which one wears the pants and which one the dress?
Quote:
Rbbi1: You're talking spiritual principles to people with blinders on. They can't see it's the same spirit, the flesh of the victim is merely "incidental", as is the age. Peace
.....
Really, and exactly just who are you to be that judge of the most correct way to approach what has been discussed?
Exactly what qualifies you as being the arbitrator of justice when such special circumstances do not exist confused.
You subtract all the time when a Christian brings a Bible-based answer that although you do not like responses add.
The question is whether NAMBLA's normal to you, does it have a place in society to exist, is that truth and to good?
I am a person who has actually been paying aattention to what the civil controversy has been about: GAY MARRIAGE. It is NOT about NAMBLA or bathhouses or gay pride parades or anything else, so if you want to make any kind of sense, address the subject. Now THIS OP was about the censure he has been subjected to concerning his feelingsm and been told that there is nothing wrong with attractions, so that it then becomes a matter of what is done with them. This led to the point of standard discussion that a committed relationship was something that he might find an appropriate response for him.
Your nonsense has NOTHING to do with this. Take it somewhere else.
You're talking spiritual principles to people with blinders on. They can't see it's the same spirit, the flesh of the victim is merely "incidental", as is the age. Peace
When you can point out actual harm you will have something worth considering.
Because it is the ONLY valid basis for making law or even advising Christians on their conduct.
So pointing out the actual harm is the only valid basis for advising Christians on their conduct, is it? And by WHOSE standards do we gauge this harm, YOURS? Because I find yours to be seriously lacking.
When you create your own man out of dust, then you can decide what actual harm to him is. Until then, you're seriously underqualified. But then you know that already, don't you? Peace
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Pointing to negative extremes is the way they justify bigotry.
