Im Bi sexual (Im a Christian) (spiritual, Biblical, America, Corinthians)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Fundamentalists ought to hope reincarnation is not real. Can you imagine that, hating homosexuals in this life and in the next life being homosexual and wanting to be accepted and loved for what you are.
Acts 10
[38] How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him.
[39] And we are witnesses of all things which he did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on a tree:
[40] Him God raised up the third day, and shewed him openly;
[41] Not to all the people, but unto witnesses chosen before of God, even to us, who did eat and drink with him after he rose from the dead.
[42] And he commanded us to preach unto the people, and to testify that it is he which was ordained of God to be the Judge of quick [living] and dead.
[43] To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
So was Jesus telling a porkie when he dictated John 8:15 to the gospel of John ?.
I judge no man but If I did judge it would not be how you lot do. John 8:15
Fundamentalists ought to hope reincarnation is not real. Can you imagine that, hating homosexuals in this life and in the next life being homosexual and wanting to be accepted and loved for what you are.
Not likely Jimmie, I've already worn that garment. I would fancy coming back as a modern day charles spurgeon who was also a universalist, who also spoke so wonderful of God it would cause many to return to the Father.
Originally Posted by scgrahamYou say that I'm a judge, but it is the Word that judges, and all will face It.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift
If the Word had anything to say about it you might have a point, but it doesn't. You got nothing, first because you assume that society shared your prejudice about homosexuality when many considered it a natural expression of sexuality and such people were in no way "downtrodden," and second a lack of explicit approval doesn't even address the question of harm being done.
I Corinthians 6
9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Now the original posted asked a question of which there have been several answers, while others wished to admit they have never even regretted.
That is all up to them if they do so, their rights are just as fashionable as anyone else's, as most societies have never of some actions ever accepted.
Now unto the subject of children and them being taught certain things are normal, a special function of society, what is to be the actual elaborated.
Is NAMBLA another 'normal' way to view reality speaks several languages, there is no single way that is right, just everything in a big box included.
9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Now the original posted asked a question of which there have been several answers, while others wished to admit they have never even regretted.
That is all up to them if they do so, their rights are just as fashionable as anyone else's, as most societies have never of some actions ever accepted.
Now unto the subject of children and them being taught certain things are normal, a special function of society, what is to be the actual elaborated.
Is NAMBLA another 'normal' way to view reality speaks several languages, there is no single way that is right, just everything in a big box included.
When you can leave discussion of patently harmful behaviors out of this where they do not belong, and talk about a committed relationship between two people you could possibly have something to say. Until you stop conflating such a relationship with practices that compare to adultry, profligacy, heterosexual child abuse and such things that you also KNOW are a part of the heterosexual world and are NO reflection on a real heterosexual relationship in love you have nothing to add.
When you can leave discussion of patently harmful behaviors out of this where they do not belong, and talk about a committed relationship between two people you could possibly have something to say. Until you stop conflating such a relationship with practices that compare to adultry, profligacy, heterosexual child abuse and such things that you also KNOW are a part of the heterosexual world and are NO reflection on a real heterosexual relationship in love you have nothing to add.
WOW!!!
Boom, Alice!! To the moon! (If you get my reference) Too soon, but great comment.
When you can leave discussion of patently harmful behaviors out of this where they do not belong, and talk about a committed relationship between two people you could possibly have something to say. Until you stop conflating such a relationship with practices that compare to adultry, profligacy, heterosexual child abuse and such things that you also KNOW are a part of the heterosexual world and are NO reflection on a real heterosexual relationship in love you have nothing to add.
Originally Posted by scgrahamYou say that I'm a judge, but it is the Word that judges, and all will face It.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift If the Word had anything to say about it you might have a point, but it doesn't. You got nothing, first because you assume that society shared your prejudice about homosexuality when many considered it a natural expression of sexuality and such people were in no way "downtrodden," and second a lack of explicit approval doesn't even address the question of harm being done.
I Corinthians 6
9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Now the original posted asked a question of which there have been several answers, while others wished to admit they have never even regretted.
That is all up to them if they do so, their rights are just as fashionable as anyone else's, as most societies have never of some actions ever accepted.
Now unto the subject of children and them being taught certain things are normal, a special function of society, what is to be the actual elaborated.
Is NAMBLA another 'normal' way to view reality speaks several languages, there is no single way that is right, just everything in a big box included.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift
When you can leave discussion of patently harmful behaviors out of this where they do not belong, and talk about a committed relationship between two people you could possibly have something to say. Until you stop conflating such a relationship with practices that compare to adultry, profligacy, heterosexual child abuse and such things that you also KNOW are a part of the heterosexual world and are NO reflection on a real heterosexual relationship in love you have nothing to add.
Really, and exactly just who are you to be that judge of the most correct way to approach what has been discussed?
Exactly what qualifies you as being the arbitrator of justice when such special circumstances do not exist confused.
You subtract all the time when a Christian brings a Bible-based answer that although you do not like responses add.
The question is whether NAMBLA's normal to you, does it have a place in society to exist, is that truth and to good?
The question is whether NAMBLA's normal to you, does it have a place in society to exist, is that truth and to good?
Absolutely uncalled-for, ridiculous, and frankly-stupid insinuation.
You would be laughable if you didn't vote or breed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Too soon, but great comment.