Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-05-2018, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Middle America
11,243 posts, read 7,297,020 times
Reputation: 17150

Advertisements

Valuing fundamentals can basically go in two directions.

1) One is simply believing and valuing basics of a particular belief system. It is a personal matter that doesn't radiate outward into trying to affect others. It can be used to see one's own faults.

2) The second is a soapbox preachy effort that seeks to control and change others. It's a petty narrowness that uses the fundamentals to divide, judge, and antagonize others. It takes blame and fault off oneself, and puts it on others.

The first is healthy, the second is hazardous. The second drives people away from spirituality and belief systems, stirs up trouble, and creates enemies.

There's no difference between fundamentalist Christianity (the second way) and the ways of the Pharisees and Sadducees that Jesus wrangled with. Both were legalistic, antagonistic, and judgement-filled. We should call them out just as Jesus did. Angst-filled fundamentalists are a cancer to Christianity. If a person doesn't speak out against them, then he/she is partners with them and their evil.

Last edited by Thoreau424; 03-05-2018 at 10:50 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-05-2018, 10:42 AM
 
Location: Northern California
107 posts, read 86,168 times
Reputation: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by SumTingy View Post
fundamentalism definition

strict adherence to the basic principles of any subject or discipline. An unwavering attachment to a set of irreducible beliefs.

In other words, a firm belief that the Bible is the infallible, inspired Word of God. And our faith and belief in Jesus our Lord, we have hope for eternal life
So in other words, a fundy is a Christian? Never knew that.

Christian is first found in the New Testament in the Book of Acts. So if you don't believe in that definition from the Apostle Paul in the book of Acts, then you don't believe as a Christian does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,826,985 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by SumTingy View Post
fundamentalism definition

strict adherence to the basic principles of any subject or discipline. An unwavering attachment to a set of irreducible beliefs.

In other words, a firm belief that the Bible is the infallible, inspired Word of God. And our faith and belief in Jesus our Lord, we have hope for eternal life
It is used in derogatory sense around here, and Christians are routinely compared to nazis, ISIS terrorists etc. The Bible is being described as "writings of ancient savages". It is what it is.

You offered a good definition: "strict adherence to the basic principles of any subject or discipline".

Or simply: "adherence to fundamental teachings of Jesus Christ".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Northern California
107 posts, read 86,168 times
Reputation: 228
This is a secular message board so it isn't surprising unbelievers who permiate these boards would re-define the definition of Christian into being synonymous with Fundy. It only gets worse


People will re-define the definition of Christian into all types of things which adhere to their sinful lifestyles- Thieving, murder, adultery, homosexuality, fornication, drunkenness, beastality, you name it.
The world, as the truth of the gospel tells us, is only getting worse. These types need prayer as the blood covers sins yes but it doesn't EVER cover justifying and continuing in them as if they are NOT sinful. We cannot be saved if we don't first re-cognize, our sinful condition and the need to be saved from that and it's consequences
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Panama City, FL
3,536 posts, read 1,722,276 times
Reputation: 1399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
It is used in derogatory sense around here, and Christians are routinely compared to nazis, ISIS terrorists etc. The Bible is being described as "writings of ancient savages". It is what it is.

You offered a good definition: "strict adherence to the basic principles of any subject or discipline".

Or simply: "adherence to fundamental teachings of Jesus Christ".
Shall we all pull out our little violins and play for you, you poor little persecuted thing. Read the book of Revelation. Jesus said some really harsh stuff about the CHURCHES. You know why? Because they sinned against God while they should have known better than the "world".

Serious question for Finn: Have you ever wept, I mean with bowled over grief for anyone other than yourself?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,826,985 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by RainMusic View Post
Shall we all pull out our little violins and play for you
Whatever gets you through the night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 06:02 PM
 
1,183 posts, read 542,040 times
Reputation: 326
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes View Post
I've highlighted one of my problems with fundamentalism. What happens when you discover new information that goes against your beliefs?

I've had 1 person use 2 Peter 2 talking about false teachers to get around the fact that several early Christians said the NT HAD been changed (Dionysius of Corinth, Tertullian, Eusebius). they didn't like this new information.

If I'm the false teacher, I did give a reference for them to check.

If Eusebius is a false teacher, that makes most of Christianity suspect, as the writings of Eusebius account for most of what we know about the early Christian church.

And if Tertullian is a false teacher, bang goes the trinity, as he was the first person to formulate that doctrine.

Typically the person didn't respond, but then if I'd destroyed the church, I'd have to blank that out too.

But then that means you are forcing your theology onto reality instead of allowing reality to determine your theology.
Lets see. Thousands of theologians throughout the centuries devoted their life studying the ancient manuscripts ensuring accuracy of the Scripture. But wait! Here comes a 21 century nonbeliever who read a blog about early Christians.

This non believer has no formal education in ancient Greek, Aramaic, or Hebrew. And, he probably has to lookup the word “Hermeneutics” to even know what it means. But lets all follow him because he knows what he is talking about. Afterall, he read it on the Internet so it must be true,

Bonjour!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 06:38 PM
 
Location: arizona ... most of the time
11,825 posts, read 12,538,965 times
Reputation: 1321
Quote:
Originally Posted by SumTingy View Post
Well you walk, talk, and breathe. So did the Nazis. Therefore, according to your logic, you must be a Nazi!

Why is it always lust with you? Is it really worth a forever of being dead for a few moments of doing what you do? You should consider that logic before its too late. For what profits a man if he gains the whole world! But loses his own soul?
1) First paragraph:
The list wasn't "my" logic ... it's the logic that Finn has been blessed with hearing from uniquely gifted, non-judgmental, civil, God is love non-fundamental folks.

2)Second paragraph:
No idea what you're getting at with "Why is it always lust with you?"

I totally agree that you really ought to have done your homework like mensaguy said ... honestly, there is no possible reached consensus as to the definition of fundamentalism as those 14 examples recently coming from certain unexpressed views by any non-fundamentalists liberals would suggest otherwise.

Maybe Finn and ilk folks like me and others are what causing the confusion to any consensus.
If we were to go away maybe it would stop your head shaking.

Last edited by twin.spin; 03-05-2018 at 06:53 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 07:43 PM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
17,071 posts, read 10,980,785 times
Reputation: 1874
Quote:
Originally Posted by SumTingy View Post
Lets see. Thousands of theologians throughout the centuries devoted their life studying the ancient manuscripts ensuring accuracy of the Scripture. But wait! Here comes a 21 century nonbeliever who read a blog about early Christians.

This non believer has no formal education in ancient Greek, Aramaic, or Hebrew. And, he probably has to lookup the word “Hermeneutics” to even know what it means. But lets all follow him because he knows what he is talking about. Afterall, he read it on the Internet so it must be true,

Bonjour!
Seriously? Thousands of "theologians" who have been wrangling about the religion they have built on the simple Way Jesus taught because of THEIR vested interest in the various warring organizations throughout history is your REASON for accepting the particular orthodoxy YOU espouse?


What ARE you THINKING?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 07:56 PM
 
64,097 posts, read 40,395,194 times
Reputation: 7915
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticPhD View Post
It is NOT an issue of a firm belief and trust in Jesus and God. That makes sense. The issue is having a firm belief and faith in everything in the Bible written by fallible men or in your case the fallible men who wrote the apologetics you read.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift View Post
I guess that call also prevented you from answering the questions about why you propose belief in something God did not promise to the detriment of what IS promised?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top