Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Dnick, Reading the writings of some of the early church Fathers, even if some of them agreed with your point of view, would NOT, in ANY way, prove that what some of them believed was actual TRUTH.
FYI, The early church father's have ALWAYS been divided on hundreds upon hundreds of scriptural interpretations, as the churches still are today! So, your "dare to "read the early church fathers" is quite pointless don't you think?
So You think you know the truth better than someone taught be the apostles. You must think pretty high of yourself. And the Early church fathers aren't divided on hundreds of scriptural interpretation, there wasn't even scripture yet. And They Certainly don't disagree on the communion. But since you know the truth better than the first disciples, I guess we should all go to you for answers.
they must disagree as Paul clearly indicated that you shouldn't have the Lord's Supper everytime you meet
the Lord's Supper is Passover which is done once per year
Quote:
Originally Posted by DNick
So You think you know the truth better than someone taught be the apostles. You must think pretty high of yourself. And the Early church fathers aren't divided on hundreds of scriptural interpretation, there wasn't even scripture yet. And They Certainly don't disagree on the communion. But since you know the truth better than the first disciples, I guess we should all to you for answers.
So You think you know the truth better than someone taught be the apostles. You must think pretty high of yourself. And the Early church fathers aren't divided on hundreds of scriptural interpretation, there wasn't even scripture yet. And They Certainly don't disagree on the communion. But since you know the truth better than the first disciples, I guess we should all go to you for answers.
>>> you write: And the Early church fathers aren't divided on hundreds of scriptural interpretation, there wasn't even scripture yet.
Are you SERIOUS??? This is a joke right???
LOL. So sorry to inform you DNick...but I think that you have a LOT more "homework" than you're aware of! Evidently you know NOTHING about the early church fathers, NOR what they themselves VERY clearly called SCRIPTURE! HELLO ??? The WORD OF GOD (scripture) was written down LONG before any early CHURCH! AND therefore...LONG before any church "fathers" !! Remember the OLD TESTAMENT Nick??? Or is that not considered "scriptural" to you? WHAT, pray tell, did the early church Fathers STUDY, to beCOME church Fathers, if they had no scriptures ????? This is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard!
When you have 30+ years of studying under your belt, please do come back and we'll have at least a reasonably intelligent discussion on the subject at hand. Until then...please DO go and do your much needed "homework". .
You have a good day now.
i think you are or are you telling me that Paul tells them to stay home if they're hungry when according to the catholic tradition they are having communion with a piece of cracker/wafer with a tiny cup of wine
do you really think people were that hungry to come to church for a tiny cracker and tiny cup of wine???
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oakback
I think your missing the point of 1Cor 11:20.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.