Quote:
Originally Posted by DayoftheLord
Her answer was not stupid.....it may have been flubbed up a little but the point was made that she is a Christian and she believes God when He says that homosexuality is an abomination and WRONG.
Have you ever been put on the spot in front of millions of people to answer a question that you know your answer will not be well received? NO, you haven't. Give the girl a break, she was nervous just like any of us would be. I don't believe she meant to even say "in my country"....she meant to just say in my family but that's not what came out to begin with.
You know as well as I do that this Perez nutjob saying he was upset because he simply didn't like her answer (btw, his words...she's a dumb b****) is a lie. He is an out loud, in-your-face homosexual who HATES that she doesn't go along with same sex marriage. Why do you insist on arguing for someone who you KNOW is wrong, just for the sake of arguing?
|
Well considering the question had to do with states rights and not her personal religious views.. it was a stupid answer.
Its like me asking you if you if states should allow the eating of hot dogs and you reply with "I don't like mayo on my burger.. burgers are what my family raised me on.. Go burgers.."
No.. I havnen't been on the spot. In fact I said that a few posts back. Then again I don't put myself in a position to prace around half naked either.. thus she was in a pagaent.. thats what they do.. they ask you questions. If you don't answer with a coherent answer.. the judges (you know.. the ones who judge and all) get to deduct points as they see fit. She didn't have a coherent answer (though to her credit most beauty queens don't.. they are taught to dance around the subject).
Whether or not Perez is lying isn't for me to say. In fact he posted his blog right after the show (even wearing the same clothes) so in the heat of the emotion you would think he would have said "I deducted points because she hates gays"... but he didn't.. he stated how she should have answered the question (considering she didn't answer the question at all).
I'm not arguing for him. I don't like him. I'm arguing against the insane idea that this is somehow some sort of left wing conspiracy against Miss California. The very thought of that is beyond her stupid answer.
See DOTL.. I don't take sides based on whether or not I like someone. I choose a side based on how I see the situation. Its called my own personal objectivity.
Bottom line is she didn't answer the question.. she stumbled etc. Now could there be an argument that if Perez gave her zero points then she was unfairly judged. Sure. But then again.. he was the judge.. she entered the contest knowing he was a judge. She took that chance..
Good for her if she feels like she is standing by her morals. **** on her for making a big deal out of it.
edit: the *** is another word for pee. :-)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
