Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-28-2022, 11:09 PM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,859,567 times
Reputation: 8666

Advertisements

Gotta be an address of a real building.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-28-2022, 11:13 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,751,203 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
Gotta be an address of a real building.
Ok, please try this below if you get a chance.

1615 3rd St NW, Washington, DC 20001
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2022, 11:25 PM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,859,567 times
Reputation: 8666
They don't list that, but 1600 3rd St NW would be 90,861.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2022, 11:35 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,751,203 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
They don't list that, but 1600 3rd St NW would be 90,861.
For 2027? Ok, thanks! That makes a whole lot more sense. That side of DC has historically been way less dense than the areas you captured before (U Street, Shaw, Dupont Circle, Logan Circle) when you came up with 92,701. It is only a matter of time before the eastern side of the urban core referenced in the address you used 1600 3rd St NW crushes the western side of the urban core. I can't wait to see 2030 and 2035 numbers in the future. I'm also interested to see Navy Yard, Buzzard Point, Waterfront Station, and The Wharf numbers in the future.

Again, thanks for the data. You didn't have to compile it and I know everyone on the board appreciates it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2022, 07:29 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,629 posts, read 12,754,191 times
Reputation: 11221
Downtown Baltimore where if you’re not gettin. Hassled (or shot) by squeegee boys… video production crews are getting threatened with being shot (yes, that is what happened) and financially extorted by thugs. To the point where they shut down production and move the entire crew to a different location. This wouldn’t happen in Harbor East or Inner Harbor…

https://deadline.com/2022/08/lady-in...235101762/amp/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2022, 08:24 AM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,859,567 times
Reputation: 8666
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
They don't list that, but 1600 3rd St NW would be 90,861.

Oops, you said 2027... 98,170
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2022, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,751,203 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
Oops, you said 2027... 98,170
Now this is starting to align more with my estimates for population growth in the Mt. Vernon Triangle, Northwest One, NOMA, Union Market area. If it will reach 98,170 by the year 2027, it will be way over 100,000 by 2030 when many of the projects will be finished and leased up. These few projects are just the tip of the iceberg in that area:


Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
Also, I realized the discrepancy is the 2027 deadline. Most of the projects I'm referring to won't be fully leased by 2027. Many aren't starting till the end of 2024 and some are further than that. This is a long-term conversation anyway. Full buildout for these neighborhoods will happen after 2030 honestly.

Future NOMA/Union Market/Northwest One Pipeline

388 Unit Building

116 Unit Building

805 Unit Building

557 Unit Building

115 Unit Building

650 Unit Building

1,119 Unit Development

740 Unit Building Development (Second Phase)

577 Unit Building

715 Unit Building

379 Unit Building

1,200 Unit Development

3 Million Square Feet: New Images Show Massive Development Plans Adjacent to Union Station (1,500 Residential Units)

etc.

etc.

etc.

You get the point....
That area has a long way to go before it reaches the 150,000+ mark, but the amount of buildings in the pipeline will definitely push it beyond that mark and flirt with something between 150,000 and 200,000 potentially.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2022, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,751,203 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
This is getting further from the "Top 10 Downtowns," but might help inform that discussion.

Residents in one-mile radius, 2022:
--New York (Manhattan), 135 Crosby: 271,114
--New York (Manhattan), 102 W 116th: 225,468
--New York (Manhattan), 50 W 34th: 208,104
--New York (Manhattan), 1008 Ave of the Americas: 205,284
--New York (Manhattan), 50 Central Park S: 203,678
--New York (Brooklyn), 276 Livingston: 167,238
--San Francisco (north Tenderloin), 605 Ellis: 150,401
--Los Angeles (Koreatown), 3324 Wilshire: 147,470
--San Francisco (Civic Center, S Tenderloin), 350 Ellis: 141,826
--Chicago (River North), 222 W Erie: 134,653
--Chicago (Loop), 348 Lake, 112,275
--Boston, 100 Clarendon (Back Bay Station): 108,915
--Seattle (Downtown), 906 Pine: 108,515
--Los Angeles (Downtown), 601 S Figueroa: 101,773
--Philadelphia, 1300 Locust: 98,852 (similar a few blocks south)
--DC, 1514 15th St NW: 92,701
--Miami, 33 SW 2nd: 89,926 (dense area is relatively narrow)
--DC, 1030 15th St NW: 80,858
--Long Beach, CA, 640 Long Beach Blvd: 78,583
--Hollywood, CA, 1300 Vine: 66,189
--Honolulu, 550 S Beretania: 61,784
--Oakland, 2029 Broadway: 55,917
--Newark, 580 MLK: 55,210
--Portland, 1331 SW Washington: 54,059
--Denver, 1570 Tremont: 53,422
--Arlington, VA, 3401 Fairfax: 53,166
--San Diego, 1130 7th: 51,218
--Seattle (U District), 1300 NE 45th: 48,792
--Minneapolis, 910 Lasalle: 46,539
--San Jose, 315 E San Fernando: 45,070
--Atlanta (Midtown), 675 Peachtree: 42,176
--Baltimore, 250 N Calvert: 39,370
--Dallas, 1801 N Pearl: 35,348
--Providence, 115 W Exchange: 33,448
--Austin, 920 Colorado: 33,242
--Atlanta (CBD), 384 Peachtree: 32,678
--Milwaukee, 929 N Water: 31,831
--Sacramento, 1325 15th: 30,807
--Pittsburgh (Oakland), 3805 Forbes: 30,315
--Bellevue, WA, 550 106th Ave NE: 29,861
--Houston, 601 Jefferson: 29,101
--Charlotte, 400 E Stonewall: 27,454
--Tacoma, 615 S 9th: 25,526
--Phoenix, 702 N Central: 25,014
--Buffalo, 707 Washington: 24,579
--Cincinnati, 44 E Court: 23,583
--Kansas City (Plaza), 4312 JC Nichols: 23,405
--New Orleans, 600 Loyola Ct.: 22,615
--St. Louis (West End), 4440 Lindell: 22,560
--Tampa, 921 N Morgan: 21,880
--St. Paul, 600 N Robert: 21,818
--Columbus, 456 E Cherry: 20,722
--Pittsburgh (Downtown), 717 Grant: 19,523
--Las Vegas, 501 E 8th: 19,496
--San Antonio, 300 Convent: 17,633
--St. Louis (Downtown), 1531 Pine: 17,404
--Cleveland, 1802 Chester: 17,297
--Kansas City (Downtown), 601 E 12th: 15,880
--Jacksonville, 330 State: 15,052
--Detroit, 2301 Woodward: 14,325
--Memphis: 336 Monroe: 14,090
--Fort Worth, 501 W Lancaster: 13,462
--Oklahoma City, 701 Couch: 11,181

They have Canada but only in kilometers. A two-kilo radius would be 12.56 square kilos if I'm doing it right, or 1.54x the one-mile radius.
--Toronto, 336 Yonge: 246,014 (159,749 for the average square mile)
--Vancouver, 1088 Homer: 158,022 (102,611 for the average square mile; lots of water)
--Montreal, 475 Av du President-Kennedy: 124,713 (80,982 average; dense area is fairly narrow)

So I was playing around with the radius tool on google maps which allows you to measure distance. From what I can see, all of Greater Center City Philadelphia, Greater Downtown Boston, Greater Downtown San Francisco, and Greater Downtown Seattle would be included in their population count for the most part. I'm sure their concentrated development and skyscrapers play a role in that footprint. Do those cities have additional midtown or separate downtown areas outside of the 1-mile radius with similar current density or future 2027 density?

That data would be very interesting especially when compared to the king of density NYC which has many areas with similar density that don't overlap providing high density neighborhood options all over the city miles from each other and Chicago is probably another one. Your data has shown DC is another city with high density neighborhoods miles from each other that don't overlap, but that is a result of height limits, so it really isn't organic. Height limits create that.

My question is whether multiple neighborhoods with the highest density exist in cities outside NYC, Chicago, and DC miles from each other? I would guess San Fran does and maybe South Philly? American cities have created zoning that limits density outside downtown areas which seems to be preventing this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2022, 11:06 AM
 
Location: Germantown, Philadelphia
14,166 posts, read 9,058,487 times
Reputation: 10506
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post

My question is whether multiple neighborhoods with the highest density exist in cities outside NYC, Chicago, and DC miles from each other? I would guess San Fran does and maybe South Philly? American cities have created zoning that limits density outside downtown areas which seems to be preventing this.
Well, the intersting thing in Kansas City is, that densest one-mile radius you found is not downtown, but rather in between Westport (the city's principal entertainment district as well as the oldest part of the city, predating its settlement in 1838 and incorporation in 1850) and the Country Club Plaza, the nation's first planned shopping center (ringed by apartment buildings, more than half of them high-rises).

I believe the Plaza is classed as an "edge city."

The dense area you found in St. Louis is likewise away from downtown; I don't know if the Central West End or the adjacent commercial district to its east, which would also lie within that one-mile radius, is considered an edge city or not (I suspect not).

And part of the reason for this is, despite rapid population growth in the downtown-adjacent districts in both cities, both KC and StL still have rather small downtown residential populations.

By the way, that's 4312 Mill Creek Parkway (I think I've explained why in one thread or other here on C-D), and there's not even a building at that address: it's parkland just north of St. Luke's Hospital.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2022, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,751,203 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarketStEl View Post
Well, the intersting thing in Kansas City is, that densest one-mile radius you found is not downtown, but rather in between Westport (the city's principal entertainment district as well as the oldest part of the city, predating its settlement in 1838 and incorporation in 1850) and the Country Club Plaza, the nation's first planned shopping center (ringed by apartment buildings, more than half of them high-rises).

I believe the Plaza is classed as an "edge city."

The dense area you found in St. Louis is likewise away from downtown; I don't know if the Central West End or the adjacent commercial district to its east, which would also lie within that one-mile radius, is considered an edge city or not (I suspect not).

And part of the reason for this is, despite rapid population growth in the downtown-adjacent districts in both cities, both KC and StL still have rather small downtown residential populations.

By the way, that's 4312 Mill Creek Parkway (I think I've explained why in one thread or other here on C-D), and there's not even a building at that address: it's parkland just north of St. Luke's Hospital.
That is interesting, but it may have more to do with the depopulation of those cities? St. Louis used to have 856,796 people within 61.72 sq miles. I'm sure that downtown area would have had extreme density back then right? I know household sizes are way lower now, but there was a lot of residential density I would assume.

To your point, DC was similar until recently, nobody lived in downtown DC. Looking at the radius tool by zip code, the 20009 zip code in DC appears to have more people than anywhere in Boston and Philadelphia despite those cities being denser overall. I think DC's suburban outer neighborhoods play a role in the perception that DC has not passed those cities in peak density when the data seems to say otherwise.

Boston

DC

Philadelphia

Total Population Within 1-Mile Radius
DC = 101,885 people
Boston = 99,052 people
Philly = 94,304 people

I thought this stat was pretty interesting too:

Population Between Ages 25-34
DC = 37,758 people
Philly = 34,161 people
Boston = 26,482 people

Population Between Ages 35-44
DC = 17,925 people
Philly = 12,601 people
Boston = 10,275 people

Population Between Ages 25-44
DC = 55,683 people
Philly = 46,762 people
Boston = 36,757 people


The biggest difference in "who" lives in these areas is this below:

Population Between Ages 15-19
Boston = 10,477 people
DC = 2,126 people
Philly = 1,985 people


*** Just and FYI, Boston's population in the data collection above includes areas outside Boston city limits. Keeping the radius within Boston city limits produced far lower population counts so I wanted to show Boston and its suburbs together.***

Last edited by MDAllstar; 08-29-2022 at 12:41 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top