Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-20-2013, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,851,756 times
Reputation: 4049

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SFNative87 View Post
This list isn't completely bad. The shocker is DC being #2, as has been stated several times.

Out of the cities I have been to, my list would go

1. NYC
2. Chicago
3. San Francisco
4. Philadelphia
5. San Diego
6. Boston
7. Los Angeles
8. Atlanta
9. Detroit
10. Oakland
Downtown San Diego is nice, but I think that DTLA has surpassed it in the last few years. San Diego's downtown does feel a bit more upscale than DTLA but overall "buzz" and amount of people and things to do, I think Los Angeles comes out on top.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-20-2013, 01:45 PM
 
281 posts, read 472,771 times
Reputation: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFNative87 View Post
This list isn't completely bad. The shocker is DC being #2, as has been stated several times.

Out of the cities I have been to, my list would go


1. NYC
2. Chicago
3. SF
4. Boston
5. DC
7. Philly
8. Seattle
9. LA
10. Denver
Fixed it for you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2013, 04:18 PM
 
592 posts, read 828,184 times
Reputation: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by disposable2 View Post
Fixed it for you
lol fair enough. I have actually been to DC but forgot to rank it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2013, 04:22 PM
 
592 posts, read 828,184 times
Reputation: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
Downtown San Diego is nice, but I think that DTLA has surpassed it in the last few years. San Diego's downtown does feel a bit more upscale than DTLA but overall "buzz" and amount of people and things to do, I think Los Angeles comes out on top.
Hmm, perhaps! I admit that I haven't been downtown LA in two years, and it was at night. Last time I went downtown LA during the daytime was about three years ago. I can't say it was very enjoyable, but I heard that its been making strides lately. Downtown San Diego is one of the nicest downtown's in American imo. I'll be in Orange County soon, so I'll check out downtown LA when I'm there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2013, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
2,985 posts, read 4,883,900 times
Reputation: 3419
1. NYC
2. Chicago
3. SF
4. Boston
5. DC
7. Philly
8. Seattle
9. LA
10. San Diego
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2013, 04:28 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,692,820 times
Reputation: 3668
Edit: Now that I look at it, I would probably rank San Diego above LA.

I've been to all of these cities except for Portland, San Diego, Denver and Minneapolis. Here is what I'm thinking though. I would rank it:

1. Manhattan
2. Chicago
3. San Francisco
4. Philadelphia
5. Boston
6. DC
7. Seattle
8. San Diego
9. Los Angeles
10. Portland

Probably New Orleans next.
Miami would come in after that I guess. Miami Beach is where it's at. Downtown? It's like 5 blocks by 5 blocks. Add in Brickell I guess, but it's not at all walkable. Buildings don't front the street and it severely lacks everything you look for in a vibrant urban Downtown.

Then probably Denver, Minneapolis, Atlanta, Pittsburgh.

Last edited by RightonWalnut; 11-20-2013 at 04:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2013, 04:36 PM
 
592 posts, read 828,184 times
Reputation: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
Boston, Philly, and San Francisco have NEVER seen such growth on that scale
A million more people over the course of 10 years in a metro area of 20,000,000 isn't that much. How many states form the NYC metro area again???? Funny how growth in places like New Jersey and Connecticut counts towards NYC. So a growth rate of 5% over 10 years...hmm, not that impressive.

On top of this, when you look at the actual city of New York, last year was the first time in 60 years that more people moved into the city than left it. The net influx was 12,000. Also, about half of NYC's population has moved there within the last 10 years. Half of Queens, which has also had a rather stagnant population, wasn't even born in the United States.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2013, 04:46 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,980 posts, read 32,640,365 times
Reputation: 13630
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFNative87 View Post
A million more people over the course of 10 years in a metro area of 20,000,000 isn't that much. How many states form the NYC metro area again???? Funny how growth in places like New Jersey and Connecticut counts towards NYC. So a growth rate of 5% over 10 years...hmm, not that impressive.

On top of this, when you look at the actual city of New York, last year was the first time in 60 years that more people moved into the city than left it. The net influx was 12,000. Also, about half of NYC's population has moved there within the last 10 years. Half of Queens, which has also had a rather stagnant population, wasn't even born in the United States.
Where are you getting that? Seems rather hard to believe 4 million people have moved to NYC in the last 10 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2013, 05:09 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,698,966 times
Reputation: 5872
Sorry to go off topic, but where do you guys think Denver would land? Somewhere in the 11-20 range maybe?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2013, 05:46 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,692,820 times
Reputation: 3668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Sorry to go off topic, but where do you guys think Denver would land? Somewhere in the 11-20 range maybe?
1. Manhattan
2. Chicago
3. San Francisco
4. Philadelphia
5. Boston
6. DC
7. Seattle
8. San Diego
9. Los Angeles
10. Portland
11. New Orleans
12. Las Vegas
13. Baltimore
14. Miami
15. Denver
16tie. San Antonio
16tie. Minneapolis
17. Pittsburgh
18. Austin
19. Nashville?
20. Sacramento?

I really struggle on where Dallas and Houston could fit. Their Downtowns are basically 9-5 business districts and outside of that there is not much more there..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top