Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which cities Have The Best Architecture??
NYC 85 44.97%
Chicago 103 54.50%
Boston 47 24.87%
LA 25 13.23%
Seattle 16 8.47%
New Orleans 47 24.87%
San Francisco 60 31.75%
Miami 17 8.99%
Austin 5 2.65%
Dallas 11 5.82%
Atlanta 10 5.29%
Denver 9 4.76%
DC 48 25.40%
Phili 48 25.40%
Other, please specify 34 17.99%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 189. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2013, 01:13 AM
 
940 posts, read 2,026,302 times
Reputation: 742

Advertisements

Are we talking best ie "overall classiest/highest quality" architecture or, our favorite city for architecture?

I believe it is the first, correct? Because in that case I'm pretty sure no one can deny that NYC is number 1, with Chicago or Boston or SF as number 2.

It's like asking which city has the most beautiful women. Obviously NYC. Does that mean everyone finds NYC women the most appealing? Of course not. But c'mon. NYC has objectively the most beautiful women in the US. And it also has objectively the best architecture. (I am of course using "objectively" sarcastically here, but in every era there are aesthetic standards and in the current moment NYC has the best architecture and the most beautiful women).

As for my personal favorites for architecture, its LA, SF, Miami, NYC, and Philly, in that order, and for different reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2013, 07:25 AM
 
2,421 posts, read 4,316,379 times
Reputation: 1479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amercity View Post
Boston should be winning this poll or some other northeastern City. Chicago is nice but almost all of their archetecture was made after 1880's many of it is just 1920s after.
Sorry but that is a read dumb statement. Just because a city has more modern architecture than another does not mean it's less of quality.

Via your theory Baghdad and Cairo have much better architecture than Paris and Barcelona. Yeah ok.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 08:26 AM
 
940 posts, read 2,026,302 times
Reputation: 742
re-read my post and meant to say Miami Beach, btw...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 08:58 AM
 
Location: BMORE!
10,106 posts, read 9,954,859 times
Reputation: 5779
Boston, NYC, Philly, Baltimore, DC, Atlanta
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 09:23 AM
 
Location: back in Philadelphia!
3,264 posts, read 5,650,788 times
Reputation: 2146
LA gets such a bad rap on here, but some of THE best distinctly american early modern architecture in the USA came out of, and is found in LA.

Charles & Ray Eames, Richard Neutra, Rudolph Schindler, etc...
Nearly all of the iconic Case Study houses are there. These things heavily impacted architecture around the world to this day.

Plus there are many fine examples of Arts & Crafts architecture in LA, most famously Greene & Greene's Gamble House.

Like it or not, LA is home to a wealth of Architectural masterworks. And lots of prominent contemporary architecture, which may go down in history as being quite important, comes out of LA. eg: Frank Gehry, Morphosis/Thom Mayne, Neil Denari, etc...

Not saying its necessarily THE best place for architecture in the USA, but it's no slouch whatsoever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 10:20 AM
 
Location: On the Great South Bay
9,169 posts, read 13,239,989 times
Reputation: 10141
^ I agree, I should have voted for Los Angeles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 06:11 PM
 
Location: Richmond/Philadelphia/Brooklyn
1,264 posts, read 1,551,650 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summersm343 View Post

Also, I put San Francisco low because it doesn't have much architectural variety either. The modern buildings tend to be bland (although there are exceptions)... and the highrises are extremely uninspired. Washington D.C. on the other hand, has some of the best lowrise and midrise modern architecture in the country.

I actually agree with you on san Francisco. I think that the city does have some great Victorian stuff, but in my opinion, all of the good stuff has been gone foe 106 years now. Also, for the most part, the city is filled with these way too pale Styrofoam and plaster Spanish and modern stuff (I find Spanish colonial, and Adobe VERY boring) .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Richmond/Philadelphia/Brooklyn
1,264 posts, read 1,551,650 times
Reputation: 768
Well I might as well put my top few in order
1 NYC
2 Chicago
3 Boston
4 Cincinnati
5 DC
6 Richmond
7 Savannah
8 Denver
9 Philly
10 San Fran
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 07:26 PM
 
940 posts, read 2,026,302 times
Reputation: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by pantin23 View Post
(I find Spanish colonial, and Adobe VERY boring) .
I know plenty people find spanish colonial not to their taste... but I've never heard "boring" before. Do you just not like boring spanish colonial, or do you find it all boring? Some of the most romantic buildings I can think of are spanish colonial (the Santa Barbara courthouse comes to mind).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 07:30 PM
 
940 posts, read 2,026,302 times
Reputation: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by rotodome View Post
LA gets such a bad rap on here, but some of THE best distinctly american early modern architecture in the USA came out of, and is found in LA.
....
This brings up another interpretation of the question--which cities have had the best local architecture movements that have produced the greatest buildings?

I would think that LA, NYC, and Chicago would then easily stand out from the crowd.

In other words, are we averaging all buildings in a city (NYC, Boston, SF)? Or are we judging only based on the "important" architecture (LA, Chicago)?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top